Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That's a valuable point of view, Anders (frubals to you, even though I partly disagree with you), but solely for the purposes of this poll, let's consider the word "insurgent" to mean the armed opposition to the current (American led) occupation.anders said:Insurgent: "rising against established authority". So, the insurgents are the invaders. And they will lose and will have to get out, like from Vietnam. I agree that the US insurgence "prevents a stable government from being installed in Iraq", but I haven't voted.
For how long?Sunstone said:winning means that the insurgency prevents a stable government from being installed in Iraq.
Long enough to destroy the political will of the Americans to wage war to establish a stable government. In other words, long enough that the Americans leave without a stable government in place.Mr_Spinkles said:For how long?
I was going to say...it seems unlikely that the insurgents will keep Iraq unstable forever. Good question.Sunstone said:Long enough to destroy the political will of the Americans to wage war to establish a stable government. In other words, long enough that the Americans leave without a stable government in place.
I hate that we went in there, but now that we're there, I think it would be worse if we left the country to a civil war. The situation sucks.Mr_Spinkles said:I've already misjudged a lot of things regarding the issue of Iraq, and a lot of things remain to be seen.
truthseekingsoul said:What will insurgents win when destabilising Iraq exactly?
No*s said:Like any other political group, they want power. If they can do that, they can institute their own political system in place of the one we're building. It's an old song and dance that.
truthseekingsoul said:And their political system will be centered around instability?
Imagine, their own political system in THEIR country. I'm glad us Scots were eventually blackmailed into union, I don't think I could tolerate a free, independant republic.
Independence. Independence from the rule of foreign occupiers and infidels. That's the word on the street anyway.truthseekingsoul said:What will insurgents win when destabilising Iraq exactly?
I don't think that's their goal. I think their goal is to prevent a government from being installed by a foreign power in Iraq. Most of the insurgents want a stable government in Iraq, they just want it installed by Iraqis and not the US. I also suspect there are several differnt insurgent groups with very different ideas about what kind of government they want.Sunstone said:For the purposes of this poll, winning means that the insurgency prevents a stable government from being installed in Iraq. What do you think are their chances of winning?
Now why would they think that? Just because that's what the British and Turks did in Iraq, and just because that's what we did in Iran, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, they assume that's what we and the British want to do now in Iraq. I guess they hate freedom!</sarcasm and lots of it>Faminedynasty said:Independence. Independence from the rule of foreign occupiers and infidels. That's the word on the street anyway.
They view whatever government we install as an extension of our rule over them, and therefore as illegitamate.