How can god not be bound by the sacraments he instituted?
It's a stretch to assume that Christ, at the Last Supper, in the context of a Jewish liturgy, instituted the sacraments for a future 'church'.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
How can god not be bound by the sacraments he instituted?
You're talking about the only church with a seat at the UN. It used to have its own country. It's political by nature.
What he has repeatedly stated, and not just in the quote I posted, that even though the ideal is to belong to the CC, "Jesus' sacrifice" allows those even outside of the faith, including no faith (atheists), may well be "saved". What I posted was by no means the only time he has talked about this.That speech was misrepresented in the media. If you see his full remarks, you'll see that his message is more like "even atheists can go to Heaven... by getting baptized and accepting Christ."
Generally speaking, you will find "pagan" beliefs in probably most, if not all, religious institutions because they tend to have copied elements from other faiths and secular traditions over the decades and centuries. And I would assume that you will find much the same within the Baha'i faith,I can document, as I have previously, concerning the argument that there is definite pagan beliefs in not only the Roman Church, but persists in most Protestant divisions of Christianity.
It isn't actually. The Holy See has a seat at the UN... though the Red Cross also has a seat at the UN, so that's not saying much.It is its own country, the Vatican is an independent State, the reason it is seated at the UN.
No, that's not what I said.The way youre saying is like I can make an investment in the Church and earn interest off my Mass attendences. If there is a grievance, I can file a complaint. Dont worry about management, we trust they will define us as consumers since we paid for our membership in the organization.
I can see why she cried.
No, that's not what I said.
Maybe she cried because she realized that her tithes were helping to pay for Church lawyers trying to stop victims of abuse from getting compensation.
A big part of the problems you are having with Penguin and Shun is that the RCC teaches differently from you.Youre confusing The Church with an organization. Catholicism is a religion. It involves a mass of people dedicated in faith.
A big part of the problems you are having with Penguin and Shun is that the RCC teaches differently from you.
The Church not only bills itself as an organization, but as The Organization. The True Church founded by Jesus Himself, the official spokes-organization for Almighty God on earth. Entrusted with the keys to Heaven and such.
Not all Catholics buy this, of course. But is there. And it has been used and misused for centuries.
Tom
You and I and most other Catholics understand this.You're talking about politics and organization. The Church all Catholics I know
You and I and most other Catholics understand this.
Do you understand why Shun and Penguin don't?
The fact that Pope Francis is taking on this issue, but with carefully measured steps, is my favorite thing about him.
Tom
Why do you think that the young gravitate toward tradition. It seems, from my experience, that the opposite is true, but I'm interested to hear why you believe that.You're in for a big surprise, I imagine. The revitalisation of the Catholic faith is coming about through the young, who gravitate heavily towards tradition.
Of course there's hope.Yeah. It saddens me that some don't understand it. I try not to get blue in the face but if a Jew can understand it @metis I can see some hope at least. Right?
Of course there's hope.
Metis is a culturally Christian dude married to a Catholic. Not really normal.
I have more hope in Pope Francis though. One of my least favorite things about Benedict was his stated goal of returning the Church to traditional teachings, even if that meant it shrunk in size and influence. Now he's gone and I suspect that is partially due to that attitude.
Tom
This is why no modern pope can rule by fiat the way medieval popes did. There's around a billion Catholics, keeping them onboard(if not on the same page), when they are a dizzying array of ages and cultures and education levels and needs, is a gargantuan task.A lot of Catholics aren't really liking Francis too much because of something he said about the GLBTQ community.
The Catholic Church is both a religion (or more accurately, a religious denomination) and an organization.Youre confusing The Church with an organization. Catholicism is a religion. It involves a mass of people dedicated in faith.
Could be. I never claimed that the Catholic Church isn't hypocritical.The church "covering things up" are
Going against their own teachings.
The Catholic Church has most definitely has its share of scandals.Scandles are not in their CCC and not in scripture.
I haven't said anything at all about a Catholic's relationship with anything.You are defining a catholics relationship with christ by blaming the church/body/people.
Yes: for instance, the Christian Brothers at the Mount Cashel orphanage beat children in the name of their religion. The religious orders who ran the Magdalene Laundries enslaved women in the name of their religion.People do things in the name of their religion.
... but yet it happens.Believe me, you wont see "promoting child molestation" in scripture and in the catechism of the catholic church.
If I found out that a church I belonged to had hurt people the way the Catholic Church has hurt people, I might cry, too.That is why she cried. It affects individual people. Organization members depending on their level may not "feel" the effects of organizational crisis. In a religion, people feel it right away.
The Catholic Church is both a religion (or more accurately, a religious denomination) and an organization.
Could be. I never claimed that the Catholic Church isn't hypocritical.
The Catholic Church has most definitely has its share of scandals.
I haven't said anything at all about a Catholic's relationship with anything.
Yes: for instance, the Christian Brothers at the Mount Cashel orphanage beat children in the name of their religion. The religious orders who ran the Magdalene Laundries enslaved women in the name of their religion.
... but yet it happens.
If I found out that a church I belonged to had hurt people the way the Catholic Church has hurt people, I might cry, too.
I can't help it if people like you misunderstand what I've said clearly.You are wrong about why she cried. Dont change my words. You may not agree but I live with and work for the residents here and when an elder whose known only christ in the church hears her Church (christ body) compared to molestation
To her, that is like saying christ aproves molestation of little boys.
No, I'm not.That, and please reread my post. All churches, temples, and mosque is an "religious organization" for business purposes. You are literally comparing the body of christ to how the church makes its money.
No, I'm not.You are saying christ is a scandal.
It seems to me that your point is to jump to absurd conclusions in order to deflect legitimate criticism. "Criticising the Church means criticizing every single Catholic and Jesus"? Give me a break.I dont know if you understand but thats my poing.
Not to excuse the scandals in any way, we do have to remember that the RCC, because if its size and scope, attracts more attention for when things go right or when they do something wrong.The Catholic Church has most definitely has its share of scandals.
I can't help it if people like you misunderstand what I've said clearly.
No, I'm not.
No, I'm not.
It seems to me that your point is to jump to absurd conclusions in order to deflect legitimate criticism. "Criticising the Church means criticizing every single Catholic and Jesus"? Give me a break.