What do you think

[Riders]

about this link?

Gay couple cited by Christian web designer who won Supreme Court case may not exist

A report in the New Republic raised questions about a 2016 inquiry that the plaintiff in a major Supreme Court case said she received for a same-sex wedding website.

www.yahoo.com

 

[fantome profane]

about this link?

Gay couple cited by Christian web designer who won Supreme Court case may not exist

A report in the New Republic raised questions about a 2016 inquiry that the plaintiff in a major Supreme Court case said she received for a same-sex wedding website.

www.yahoo.com

The lawyer who filed the case should be disbarred for presenting false information to the court.

 

[SalixIncendium]

about this link?

Gay couple cited by Christian web designer who won Supreme Court case may not exist

A report in the New Republic raised questions about a 2016 inquiry that the plaintiff in a major Supreme Court case said she received for a same-sex wedding website.

www.yahoo.com

It's a nice looking link. Seems to work well, too.

 

[Guitar's Cry]

The lawyer who filed the case should be disbarred for presenting false information to the court.

Absolutely! I can kind of see how an argument could be made that the legal theory would still stand given that it's likely that a gay couple may go to a Christian web designer for services at some point, but I see legislation like this, when fraudulently done, a specific attack on LGBTQ folks. Even if the argument over artists' free speech rights makes sense, faking an incident just to bring this to legislation is a low blow.

 

[fantome profane]

Even if the argument over artists' free speech

Do you know what the call people who work at Subway?

They call them sandwich artists.

Is my veggie wrap considered speech?

 

[Guitar's Cry]

Do you know what the call people who work at Subway?

They call them sandwich artists.

Is my veggie wrap considered speech?

Only if you don't put any sauces on it.

(Note I am not specifically making that argument.)

 

[We Never Know]

about this link?

Gay couple cited by Christian web designer who won Supreme Court case may not exist

A report in the New Republic raised questions about a 2016 inquiry that the plaintiff in a major Supreme Court case said she received for a same-sex wedding website.

www.yahoo.com

Who knows. It could be true. She wanted to start up a website business but didn't want to do anything for gay couples.

Now if in her business had she turned down a gay couple, backlash would have broke loose and she probably would have been sued. This way she now knows she can turn them down.

She did it the wrong way if she lied, "put the cart before the horse" so to speak but now she knows.

 

[Copernicus]

about this link?

Gay couple cited by Christian web designer who won Supreme Court case may not exist

A report in the New Republic raised questions about a 2016 inquiry that the plaintiff in a major Supreme Court case said she received for a same-sex wedding website.

www.yahoo.com

I think that you should change your thread title to indicate what this thread is about. It's an important story.