Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
IMOP Evil=remoteness from divinity.It is a word that is used very often but what exactly is evil?
Evil is a man-made concept to describe something that causes harm, misfortune, discomfort, repulsive, etc.
Evil is cruelty, rooted in unaddressed and/or misdirected sense of suffering/ pain/ hatred.It is a word that is used very often but what exactly is evil?
Ignorance of what?Evil is "Avidya", mental and behavioural poisons that work against well-being, sustenable existence and growth.
Nearly all of it are variations on ignorance, mythification and superstition.
Mainly of the circunstances under which we exist and act; of the full extent of the consequences of what we do and fail to do; and of the intrincate rhizome of causes, consequences and duties that originates and is fed by us all.Ignorance of what?
Do you feel that other animals (non-human) are subject to this same ignorance? Or is this avidya (evil) exclusive to the human condition?Mainly of the circunstances under which we exist and act; of the full extent of the consequences of what we do and fail to do; and of the intrincate rhizome of causes, consequences and duties that originates and is fed by us all.
Morality is a property or ability that arises from the symultaneous coexistence of discernment (a form of rationality) with empathy.Do you feel that other animals (non-human) are subject to this same ignorance? Or is this avidya (evil) exclusive to the human condition?
I suppose evil is choosing to think and act deliberately contrary to the general good. The general good being that which conserves, protects and promotes the well-being of humanity.
That which does the most good for the most humans. It's really not that tough when we understand that we are a collective/cooperative species, first, and selfish individuals, second.Who decides what constitutes well-being for humanity as a whole? For example, some may say everyone living like the Amish would achieve the greatest amount of well-being for all of humanity and that technology harms humanity.
Or perhaps it is that which "conserves, protects, and promotes" each individuals personal sense of well-being. In that case, how are conflicts to be resolved if one persons pursuit of personal well-being impinges on another's?
That which does the most good for the most humans. It's really not that tough when we understand that we are a collective/cooperative species, first, and selfish individuals, second.
Seems about right.Evil is a man-made concept to describe something that causes harm, misfortune, discomfort, repulsive, etc.
It's whatever you want it to be PLUS what everyone else wants it to be.Not that tough? What constitutes good?
The collective decides based on how it effects the collective. You are part of that collective, so you get to decide based on how it effects the collective as well. If you can't or won't do that, you are a traitor to the collective that you gain your subsistence from. You are a toxic parasite.Who decides?
How does it effect the collective from which you gain and maintain your very existence? You decide this, but so will your fellow citizens. So beware of that selfishness.Does using cocaine and heroin constitute a good? Why or why not? How about sex? Is there such a thing as too much? If sex that constitutes "the most good" requires interaction with another person, who is required to meet the sexual needs of any one person? What if some people are better at it than others? Who gets to have sex with "the ones good at sex" and why?
Alright, you can have your kale on bread instead of in a dish.Also, the unnecessary addition of kale to a dish.