No*s
Captain Obvious
In this thread, I propose the following game. Take the person who posted before you, and explain what historical person they remind you of. The rules go:
First that the person must be historical, or at least someone you believe to be historical.
Second, we need to know something about them.
Third, it must be a positive comparison or a compliment, no insulting comparisons .
Fourth, the person you are likening a historical person to is the poster immediately before you in the thread.
Since I'm first, I'm going to arbitrarily pick me a victem *spins wheel*.
I think that I'll pick on *strains brow* angellous_evangellous . He reminds me in many ways of A.T. Robertson. Nate has decided upon a field of study, and he has thrown himself upon it with force and passion. Like Robertson, this is principally an academically-oriented religious study with the aim of helping people better understand things as he sees them. As a result, he pours most all of his time into that, though I have corrupted him into getting onto this site .
First that the person must be historical, or at least someone you believe to be historical.
Second, we need to know something about them.
Third, it must be a positive comparison or a compliment, no insulting comparisons .
Fourth, the person you are likening a historical person to is the poster immediately before you in the thread.
Since I'm first, I'm going to arbitrarily pick me a victem *spins wheel*.
I think that I'll pick on *strains brow* angellous_evangellous . He reminds me in many ways of A.T. Robertson. Nate has decided upon a field of study, and he has thrown himself upon it with force and passion. Like Robertson, this is principally an academically-oriented religious study with the aim of helping people better understand things as he sees them. As a result, he pours most all of his time into that, though I have corrupted him into getting onto this site .