• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

What if Einstein wrong? Without Quantum Gravity it is Tragedy?

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
Is perfectly known, that the Einstein has disapproved the Black Hole (BH) solutions. It was horrible to have an divergence, the infinities (BH, Big Bang) in the equations? The Einstein has assumed Matter conservation during the derivation of General Relativity, but it is violated in the consequences: BH, BB. Thus, the GR is wrong. Recall, the Nikola Tesla (who was blessed by his father, Eastern Orthodox Christian) that Nikola was in disagreement with Einstein. You might argue, that singular areas of divergences can be replaced by hypothetical Quantum Gravity, however to preserve the analytical solutions, all derivatives must be continuous, so the Quantum Gravity must cover all area of spacetime. Thus, in any point of spacetime the current General Relativity has trouble (with conservation laws of matter).


The facts are:
1. the space and time can be curved. Special curviness accounts for observable effects. But I argue in the researchgate.net files, that curved spacetime pays no regard to energy-momentum conservation.
2. the Einstein and us have added many ad-hoc hypothesises into the original GR. First ad-hoc was the cosmological constant Lambda. Now it seems necessary to add Dark Matter tensor as well.
Please read the COPYRIGHTED files attached in https://www.researchgate.net/post/Black_Holes_Big_Bang_Quantum_Mechanics_Dark_Matter_How_long_does_it_take_to_reject_Einstein. Can you help to publish them?


What does the energy-momentum conservation law mean? Energy means the body itself, and the impulse arises every time we run to this body: the body itself "runs" to us. So this law means the indestructibility of matter (within methodological naturalism). However, in Einstein's Gravity Theory, there are singularities, and the Big Bang, and time machines. All of them do not treat with due respect the invincibility of the material world.
“The collapse of physics as we know it”
“Science v s God Its The Collapse Of Physics As We Know it”
Science v s God Its The Collapse Of Physics As We Know it - Video Dailymotion

Monstrous Black Hole eats people in the clip: “Black Hole Sun”

For certain, therefore, it is impossible to marry the Quantum Theory (latter respects the indestructibility of matter, because quantum scientists talk about "preserving information" even in the very epicenter of a thermonuclear explosion!) and Einstein's Theory.
“What Is the Black Hole Information Paradox?”
So, we found out that the LAW OF ENERGY SAVING IS NOT IMPLEMENTED in the consequences of Einstein's Theory. However, in the article of the Russian Wikipedia "General Theory of Relativity" it is reported that
"In the general theory of relativity, the energy-momentum conservation law is used as a heuristic principle in deriving the equations of the gravitational field [Einstein A. Foundations of the General Theory of Relativity. M. Nauka, 1965, vol. 1, p. 490.] ".
We make a logical conclusion: Einstein's Theory of Gravity is refuted. Maybe from here spooks us the Dark Matter and Dark Energy: “What is Dark Matter and Dark Energy?”
Date: 1.03.2018

 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
Is perfectly known, that the Einstein has disapproved the Black Hole (BH) solutions. It was horrible to have an divergence, the infinities (BH, Big Bang) in the equations? The Einstein has assumed Matter conservation during the derivation of General Relativity, but it is violated in the consequences: BH, BB. Thus, the GR is wrong. Recall, the Nikola Tesla (who was blessed by his father, Eastern Orthodox Christian) that Nikola was in disagreement with Einstein. You might argue, that singular areas of divergences can be replaced by hypothetical Quantum Gravity, however to preserve the analytical solutions, all derivatives must be continuous, so the Quantum Gravity must cover all area of spacetime. Thus, in any point of spacetime the current General Relativity has trouble (with conservation laws of matter).


The facts are:
1. the space and time can be curved. Special curviness accounts for observable effects. But I argue in the researchgate.net files, that curved spacetime pays no regard to energy-momentum conservation.
2. the Einstein and us have added many ad-hoc hypothesises into the original GR. First ad-hoc was the cosmological constant Lambda. Now it seems necessary to add Dark Matter tensor as well.
Please read the COPYRIGHTED files attached in https://www.researchgate.net/post/Black_Holes_Big_Bang_Quantum_Mechanics_Dark_Matter_How_long_does_it_take_to_reject_Einstein. Can you help to publish them?


What does the energy-momentum conservation law mean? Energy means the body itself, and the impulse arises every time we run to this body: the body itself "runs" to us. So this law means the indestructibility of matter (within methodological naturalism). However, in Einstein's Gravity Theory, there are singularities, and the Big Bang, and time machines. All of them do not treat with due respect the invincibility of the material world.
“The collapse of physics as we know it”
“Science v s God Its The Collapse Of Physics As We Know it”
Science v s God Its The Collapse Of Physics As We Know it - Video Dailymotion

Monstrous Black Hole eats people in the clip: “Black Hole Sun”

For certain, therefore, it is impossible to marry the Quantum Theory (latter respects the indestructibility of matter, because quantum scientists talk about "preserving information" even in the very epicenter of a thermonuclear explosion!) and Einstein's Theory.
“What Is the Black Hole Information Paradox?”
So, we found out that the LAW OF ENERGY SAVING IS NOT IMPLEMENTED in the consequences of Einstein's Theory. However, in the article of the Russian Wikipedia "General Theory of Relativity" it is reported that
"In the general theory of relativity, the energy-momentum conservation law is used as a heuristic principle in deriving the equations of the gravitational field [Einstein A. Foundations of the General Theory of Relativity. M. Nauka, 1965, vol. 1, p. 490.] ".
We make a logical conclusion: Einstein's Theory of Gravity is refuted. Maybe from here spooks us the Dark Matter and Dark Energy: “What is Dark Matter and Dark Energy?”
Date: 1.03.2018


General relativity (theory of gravitation) is not valid for quantum effects at singularity.
This is acknowledged but is not wrong for the domain it was written for.
 
Top