Whateverist
Active Member
I can but I thought colorful language was popular here. No?
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What is "Bad" Science?
- Thread starter dybmh
- Start date
I can but I thought colorful language was popular here. No?
Kathryn
It was on fire when I laid down on it.
Thanks for the clarification.
dybmh
ויהי מבדיל בין מים למים
( Shhhhhhhhh. Don't spoil the illusion. )
dybmh
ויהי מבדיל בין מים למים
This case of institutional failure makes me wonder how well peer review can play its vaunted role in the practice of science. All quotes below come from this article: "Get Me Off Your ****ing Mailing List" is an actual science paper accepted by a journal
The paper .. titled "Get me off your ****ing mailing list," was accepted by the International Journal of Advanced Computer Technology.
The journal, despite its distinguished name, is a predatory open-access journal, as noted by io9. These sorts of low-quality journals spam thousands of scientists, offering to publish their work for a fee.
In 2005, computer scientists David Mazières and Eddie Kohler created this highly profane ten-page paper as a joke, to send in replying to unwanted conference invitations. It literally just contains that seven-word phrase over and over, along with a nice flow chart and scatter-plot graph:
According to the blog Scholarly Open Access, this PDF made the rounds, and an Australian computer scientist named Peter Vamplew sent it to the International Journal of Advanced Computer Technology in response to spam from the journal. Apparently, he thought the editors might simply open and read it.
Instead, they automatically accepted the paper — with an anonymous reviewer rating it as "excellent" — and requested a fee of $150.
Spoiler please, good sir. Spoilers are your friend.
dybmh
ויהי מבדיל בין מים למים
Sorry, Bro. The data is against you. At this point, you have demonstrated an extremely low standard when it comes to facts and figures.
This is discussion is going nowhere.
dybmh
ויהי מבדיל בין מים למים
The data you posted was not about Temple Tel Arad.
You're in hardcore denial mode.
Simple questions:
1) Have you read the excavation report from Tel Arad? Yes or No?
2) You are assuming that the Temple was Canaanite but you have NO DATA AT ALL about the excavation site? Yes or No?
dybmh
ויהי מבדיל בין מים למים
Where does that date come from? Do you know? Why 600 BCE? What's significant about that date?
Argentbear
Well-Known Member
Talk about bad science.No, he wasn't.
Data compiled by the Office of National Statistics (ONS) in the U.K. had shown that children who received the Covid vaccine were 4,423 percent (over 44 times) more likely to die than children who did not get the shot.
COVID Vaccinated Kids 4,423% More Likely to Die Than ‘Pureblood’ Kids
The shocking figures were revealed in a UK government report.vigilantnews.com
During the six month time frame looked at the Covid Vaccine was only given to children and adolescents who were "clinically vulnerable" such as immune suppressed youths and those with severe neuro-disability, severe or profound and multiple learning disabilities and children with significant comorbid diagnoses such as cancer. This means mortality rates were deceptively high for triple-vaccinated children because clinically vulnerable children were vastly overrepresented
Ebionite
Well-Known Member
You can't cope with the truth.
Ebionite
Well-Known Member
No, it isn't. I have the New Zealand data that was leaked by Barry Young. It's clear that there is a correlation between getting the shot and dying.
Don't know how you attributed that to me -- it wasn't. It was @shunyadragon.
Ebionite
Well-Known Member
The original deception here is that the mRNA shots were sold as being safe and effective when they were neither of those things.
Ebionite
Well-Known Member
Yes, I started replying to you and diverted to him. Getting back to your argument:
The origin story is verified by it's prophetic nature. The Isrealites did adopt some Canaanite practices, but this resulted in many of them losing their identity in the diaspora.
Ebionite
Well-Known Member
****ing awesome.This case of institutional failure makes me wonder how well peer review can play its vaunted role in the practice of science. All quotes below come from this article: "Get Me Off Your ****ing Mailing List" is an actual science paper accepted by a journal
The paper .. titled "Get me off your ****ing mailing list," was accepted by the International Journal of Advanced Computer Technology.
The journal, despite its distinguished name, is a predatory open-access journal, as noted by io9. These sorts of low-quality journals spam thousands of scientists, offering to publish their work for a fee.
In 2005, computer scientists David Mazières and Eddie Kohler created this highly profane ten-page paper as a joke, to send in replying to unwanted conference invitations. It literally just contains that seven-word phrase over and over, along with a nice flow chart and scatter-plot graph:
According to the blog Scholarly Open Access, this PDF made the rounds, and an Australian computer scientist named Peter Vamplew sent it to the International Journal of Advanced Computer Technology in response to spam from the journal. Apparently, he thought the editors might simply open and read it.
Instead, they automatically accepted the paper — with an anonymous reviewer rating it as "excellent" — and requested a fee of $150.
If you are really interested in the truth, you should perhaps read The Bible Unearthed: Archaeology's New Vision of Ancient Israel and the Origin of Its Sacred Texts, a book by Israel Finkelstein, Professor of Archaeology at Tel Aviv University, and Neil Asher Silberman, an archaeologist, historian and contributing editor to Archaeology Magazine.
Finkelstein and Silberman argue that instead of the Israelites conquering Canaan after the Exodus (as suggested by the book of Joshua), most of them had in fact always been there; the Israelites were simply Canaanites who developed into a distinct culture.
Whateverist
Active Member
Not sure what you mean. I did include bits from the article.
Whateverist
Active Member
I failed to read the fine print again. What I answered was in the service of knocking science down a peg to prevent it attaining sacred cow status. Of course fundamentalists will welcome a chance to bash science in defense of their literal Bible interpretations, but attacking them is like shooting fish in a barrel. Not worth the time.
Science is actually the gold standard for answering empirical questions and Im a big fan - where it applies, is done well and reported fairly. When it isn’t I will call it out in the defense of science.
Last edited:
Argentbear
Well-Known Member
they were actually both safe and effective and junk science can't show it to be otherwise
Ebionite
Well-Known Member
Keep believing that and get all your boosters.
Astrazeneca withdrawn from market:
Last edited:
Ebionite
Well-Known Member
Proof of the truth of the divine would naturally be found in phenomena that can't reasonably be explained by mundane causes. Archaeology is the wrong discipline for that and history, while useful, is not a great fit.