Kilk1
Member
That quote did use some strong language to describe it. I would just say paedobaptism is unscriptural. As I argue in the debate, the word baptize in the first century literally meant "immerse." Therefore, everything the Bible says about being "baptized," by definition, is talking about being immersed. Sprinkling or pouring water wouldn't count any more than would drinking it.I'm curious what would, to a reformist of early Christian, make paedobaptism evil. I don't buy consent as that's an enlightenment principle. The bible didn't establish paedobaptism to promote equality of age.
In other words, paedobaptism isn't even baptism to begin with, at least not the way the Bible uses the term.