I get the feeling you're speaking to those whose minds are fixated on something else. If they begin to understand what you're saying, they'll immediately pretend they never saw your post.Perhaps you missed the context. As a potential
SCOTUS justice, any definition she'd give would
have to be legally sound. She could easily know
she's female, without knowing a definition that
would apply generally in a court of law.
And I mean that....I'm seeing it over and over and over and over again.