I'm mostly a reductionist so truth is mostly redundant.
For example, "It's true that this chair is red." is the same as "This char is red."
Truth, essentially, is a truism. Truth is that which is true. Truth is is that which is correct (which is nothing more than "true"). Nothing more, nothing less.
The real debate IMO should be about how to determine what's true, not what truth is of in itself. In science they have the pragmatist view that it's 'true because it works'; they can't know for sure what's true but they know for sure what isn't. At least according to Feynman.