Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Beats me? "God" is the whole enchilada, imo. What part of "All That Is" don't people get? For the record that includes "All that is not" and all probable permutations thereof. Though, in light of this, I am perplexed why people think "god" is a singular entity that is self aware. That, imo, is pushing things a tad.What isn't God? Why or why not?
There isn't anything that isn't. All is. Call "is" any which way - call it God. What isn't God?
When we call everything, or all there is 'God', did we redefine it or breath a new meaning into it? and if so, what is it?What isn't God? Why or why not?
What Isn't God?
What isn't God? Why or why not?
What isn't God? Why or why not?
And, since it's not easy, ... ?This would be easier to answer if, for once, someone could answer what god is.
And, since it's not easy, ... ?
Sorry. I must have been in a hurry.Why is this in political debates?
Just so....what isn't god is directly dependent on what god is.
Oddly, I thought I had covered that as well as is possible.This would be easier to answer if, for once, someone could answer what god is.
Actually, that is both logically and semantically inaccurate.It's difficult, or even impossible, to answer, since what isn't god is directly dependent on what god is.
Oddly, I thought I had covered that as well as is possible.