Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
A fair question. The foundation of my belief in God - any God - is an intense and transformative theophany I had at a very young age, which left me obsessed with the question "What the bleep was THAT?!" In my search for the answer, I have drawn upon science, philosophy, ethics, mythology, and further personal experiences. The particulars of my theology are my current best guess, no more. Now that I seem to have settled on a concept, I find supporting evidence everywhere I look, but I'm afraid that's completely subjective. I have no evidence that is exclusive to my concept of God, and I don't claim to.What makes a God?
Short answer: A man.
As for your "Godivers", I think it is a unique view of our existence. I can see how you would hold this as a "God", but I would put it to the same test that I would the Abrahamic God.
What do you see as evidence of the existence of God, within the disparate pieces of the universe?
I don't see that it is possible for another person to invalidate your concept a God. I mean that quite literally..... Would you consider my concept a God?
Well, of course not, silly! Nor can anyone validate it. I'm just looking for conversation.I don't see that it is possible for another person to invalidate your concept a God. I mean that quite literally.
If you embrace a "Godiverse", it is not for anyone else to refute.
Well, of course not, silly! Nor can anyone validate it. I'm just looking for conversation.
Let me try another angle: Pretend for the sake of discussion that my beliefs were proven factual. Scientists manage to contact the Godiverse that Created ours (which I quite irreverently call Big Mama) and She lays it all out for us. Would you consider our universe God? Or just another organism? Why? What about Big Mama? Would you consider Her God? She is our Creator, after all.
C'mon, just play!
So you would consider Big Mama God, or both Big Mama and our Godiverse?Okay - I'm game.
If science could provide evidence of the existence of Big Mama, I would have to say that I would be an instant convert. Heck, I'd probably ask if there were any openings in the administrative branch.
I'd probably have to have some personal experience that supported the scientific findings, but you know that I would be the first to support the high priestess (Storm).
What do you see as evidence of the existence of God, within the disparate pieces of the universe?
You and I have quite different opinions about what's fair, Storm.A fair question.
You and I have quite different opinions about what's fair, Storm.
So, since I do not worship my Godiverse (or Big Mama), it is not a God?doppelgänger;1180064 said:Worship defines a "god." It could be ideas purportedly extracted from the Bible, a golden statue, a crystal phallus or a trash can lid. Worshiping it makes it a god.
If you call it a "god" then you worship it. If you don't call it a "god," then it's not a god. The point is, something is a "god" solely by virtue of grammatical association, which will necessarily vary from person to person.So, since I do not worship my Godiverse (or Big Mama), it is not a God?
Howso? I do not pray to it, submit to it (I wouldn't know how if I were willing), or consider it perfect. I merely acknowledge it. If that's worship to you... well, ok, but I don't get it.doppelgänger;1180072 said:If you call it a "god" then you worship it. If you don't call it a "god," then it's not a god. The point is, something is a "god" solely by virtue of grammatical association, which will necessarily vary from person to person.
Transcendence and Benevolence.So, what are your standards for Godhood?
What does Transcendance mean to you?Transcendence and Benevolence.
As the dictionary says, "above and beyond this physical universe."What does Transcendance mean to you?
My question to you would be when you use this shorthand term God does it serve your purpose? Does it convey your intended meaning to whoever you are communicating with, or does it confuse the issue? I suspect in your case the results are mixed, but if you find the term communicates more often than it confuses then that is the word you should use.Howso? I do not pray to it, submit to it (I wouldn't know how if I were willing), or consider it perfect. I merely acknowledge it. If that's worship to you... well, ok, but I don't get it.
As a matter of fact, "God" isn't even my preferred term, "roth" is. "God" is just a shorthand.