Especially if it's in a common area of the house. For example, I have no choice but to have mine in a corner of the dining room. The house is pitifully small with two bedrooms. The living room and dining room are what's called a "great room", with a cathedral ceiling (goes from 8' at one end to almost 16' at the other). Total waste of space. It was a popular architectural design several decades ago. Personally I think it sucks.
Given this abomination of architecture, there's no privacy for the deities or privacy to do puja undistracted. We don't very often have company, nor do we eat in the dining room, but given that the house is non-veg, on the odd times we do use the dining room, I feel creepy about the shrine being in a room with non-veg. food. Oriental screens don't work... trust me, I have them. Moreover, when someone does come to the house, they usually comment on how pretty the shrine is. I say thank you, but it makes me somewhat uncomfortable. I don't think it's supposed to be viewed as a display. The table top is a reasonable 21" deep x 24" wide, 30" height. I have scaled down considerably (it makes me feel creepy to have packed away some statues.. sort of like uninviting wedding guests).
Anyway...
I have another small table that displays some of the colorful resin statues I've collected over the years. But I don't consider it a shrine. I consider it display of objets d'art. Now here's the part that blurs the lines for me, and prompts the thread question. Given that the shrine table/altar has statues in the same style as the display table, as well as my brass ones, what makes the two any different? What makes the table I call the altar, and the corner it's in a shrine, compared to the other small display table? What makes a shrine a shrine and a display of objets d'art a display of objets d'art? It's further blurred by the fact that if and when I can ever have a proper shrine room, what are now the objets d'art will be added to the kolu I'd like to make as the shrine. I know a kolu is a Navaratri display, but I like the concept of it as a shrine. Like this (see how pretty the colors are? ):
If and when my niece moves out, and I get the 2nd bedroom back in my possession (I'm not hanging by the neck waiting, though) that room will be a den, computer room, book room, and puja room where I can use the folding screens to further remove the shrine from the house. I've seriously considered dismantling it until such time as I can set it up properly.
Apart from those lucky-duckies who have a separate room for shrine and puja, how do you differentiate between the sacred and mundane if your shrine has to be in a common or public area of the house or apartment?
Given this abomination of architecture, there's no privacy for the deities or privacy to do puja undistracted. We don't very often have company, nor do we eat in the dining room, but given that the house is non-veg, on the odd times we do use the dining room, I feel creepy about the shrine being in a room with non-veg. food. Oriental screens don't work... trust me, I have them. Moreover, when someone does come to the house, they usually comment on how pretty the shrine is. I say thank you, but it makes me somewhat uncomfortable. I don't think it's supposed to be viewed as a display. The table top is a reasonable 21" deep x 24" wide, 30" height. I have scaled down considerably (it makes me feel creepy to have packed away some statues.. sort of like uninviting wedding guests).
Anyway...
I have another small table that displays some of the colorful resin statues I've collected over the years. But I don't consider it a shrine. I consider it display of objets d'art. Now here's the part that blurs the lines for me, and prompts the thread question. Given that the shrine table/altar has statues in the same style as the display table, as well as my brass ones, what makes the two any different? What makes the table I call the altar, and the corner it's in a shrine, compared to the other small display table? What makes a shrine a shrine and a display of objets d'art a display of objets d'art? It's further blurred by the fact that if and when I can ever have a proper shrine room, what are now the objets d'art will be added to the kolu I'd like to make as the shrine. I know a kolu is a Navaratri display, but I like the concept of it as a shrine. Like this (see how pretty the colors are? ):
If and when my niece moves out, and I get the 2nd bedroom back in my possession (I'm not hanging by the neck waiting, though) that room will be a den, computer room, book room, and puja room where I can use the folding screens to further remove the shrine from the house. I've seriously considered dismantling it until such time as I can set it up properly.
Apart from those lucky-duckies who have a separate room for shrine and puja, how do you differentiate between the sacred and mundane if your shrine has to be in a common or public area of the house or apartment?