What is approximately the best number of sex partners for people to have had in their lives?
Is there some reason or reasons you picked that number? If so what are the reason(s)?
Is the optimal number different for men and women? If so, why?
I have noticed that some people -- for instance, James Dobson -- have all but made careers out of advising people to have as few sex partners in their lives as possible. They argue such things as "the more partners you have, the less you will properly bond with someone -- and therefore the greater the chance you will divorce."
But what do you think might be the optimal number of sex partners for someone?
As for myself, I've been happily and voluntarily celibate for about two decades now: I don't think ones happiness in any way depends on how many partners one has had. But before I decided to become celibate, I was perhaps a bit more active than most of the people I've known, and I suspect that in many cases -- maybe even in most cases -- if you've had 12 or so partners, and you've been reasonably active with most of them -- then you probably have about as much experience and knowledge of sex as you would have with three or four times that number of partners. So if I were forced to come up with an ideal number of partners for anyone to have had during their lives, I would most likely lean towards a dozen. HOWEVER.....
HOWEVER, unlike James Dobson and some other folks, I don't think there is any rational reason to universally prefer one number over another. For instance, a single great partner is better than a dozen mediocre partners in my opinion. And a number that works for me might not work for you. So I personally believe it's kind of hokey to think that a single number -- whether that number be none, one, or one hundred -- is optimal for everyone. Besides, quality trumps quantity in sex. So long as my partners are into high quality Balinese donkey porn, I'm happy.
Is there some reason or reasons you picked that number? If so what are the reason(s)?
Is the optimal number different for men and women? If so, why?
I have noticed that some people -- for instance, James Dobson -- have all but made careers out of advising people to have as few sex partners in their lives as possible. They argue such things as "the more partners you have, the less you will properly bond with someone -- and therefore the greater the chance you will divorce."
But what do you think might be the optimal number of sex partners for someone?
As for myself, I've been happily and voluntarily celibate for about two decades now: I don't think ones happiness in any way depends on how many partners one has had. But before I decided to become celibate, I was perhaps a bit more active than most of the people I've known, and I suspect that in many cases -- maybe even in most cases -- if you've had 12 or so partners, and you've been reasonably active with most of them -- then you probably have about as much experience and knowledge of sex as you would have with three or four times that number of partners. So if I were forced to come up with an ideal number of partners for anyone to have had during their lives, I would most likely lean towards a dozen. HOWEVER.....
HOWEVER, unlike James Dobson and some other folks, I don't think there is any rational reason to universally prefer one number over another. For instance, a single great partner is better than a dozen mediocre partners in my opinion. And a number that works for me might not work for you. So I personally believe it's kind of hokey to think that a single number -- whether that number be none, one, or one hundred -- is optimal for everyone. Besides, quality trumps quantity in sex. So long as my partners are into high quality Balinese donkey porn, I'm happy.