CG Didymus
Veteran Member
Of course it is. Why would you, a possessor of the truth, care what I think?more erroneous than helpful.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Of course it is. Why would you, a possessor of the truth, care what I think?more erroneous than helpful.
It is not my problem either.What are you apologising to me for? It's not my problem.
I guess I am different from you because I do not think it is good if their hearts are opened by someone who is teaching falsities.But you've said that no one can close your heart to the message of Baha'u'llah, and I know some who will never allow their heart to be closed to the message of Paul, on behalf of the teachings of Jesus. As long as those hearts are open by someone's words so the Spirit can work, all's good. Yes?
Because a less than stellar voice opens the heart, does not mean the Spirit cannot work with what is there. Sometimes, the heart is opened from disappointment, anger, frustration once that voice is received and dissected. Think of all the post-Christians who have found their fit. Christianity opened their heart for the exploration, and they found better.I guess I am different from you because I do not think it is good if their hearts are opened by someone who is teaching falsities.
I think it is the understanding of the message that is false, although I also think that some messages such as from Paul are false.So what's false? The message or the understanding of the message?
The exact questions we need to clarify for our own selves CG.Or... it's making a person a believer in what their religion actually tells them to do.
Did Jesus fulfill the Bible prophecies about the Messiah? I think Jews have some good reasons to believe he didn't.
Is Jesus the only way. Is it only through him we can be saved? I think that's exactly what the NT is saying.
Are all religions one? Yeah, if a person wants to believe in how the Baha'i Faith interprets things.
Yeah, IMO Paul took things a bit wack-a-doodle, but without his participation it's rather doubtful we would have ever heard Jesus's message. Hillel taught much the same, but how vastly has his work been known?I think it is the understanding of the message that is false, although I also think that some messages such as from Paul are false.
I'm afraid you're not reading it properly. Notice the last line please.You can continue to wait with the other Christians, nobody is going to stop you.
I thank God that I have nothing to wait for.
No, the Bible does not say that God will ruin those who are ruining the earth.
That is only your personal interpretation regarding what certain verses mean.
This is what I found for the NWT translation of Rev 11:18I'm afraid you're not reading it properly. Notice the last line please.
Revelation 11
We give thanks to You, O Lord God Almighty,
the One who is and who was,
because You have taken Your great power
and have begun to reign
18The nations were enraged,
and Your wrath has come.
The time has come to judge the dead
and to reward Your servants the prophets,
as well as the saints and those who fear Your name,
both small and great—
and to destroy those who destroy the earth.”
Yes, we are overstepping our given Authority in faith, we have no Authority of interpretation and that is what a Baha'i will share quotes. wPerhaps I've misunderstood your intended view with your words as follows:
"We can open our hearts to God, yet in the process make ourselves God by our self induced understandings of that Word."
From this, I take it that you believe we are overstepping our abilities as humans, when we think for ourselves when reading the words of those who speak on behalf of God. Is this correct?
Consider if all Messengers are from God, our choice of excluding a majority for only One is highly erroneous. It is us making our own self an interpreter of the Word."
Here, again, I understand you saying that if we self-interpret, we will be just as wrong as if we didn't listen to all. Is that correct?
The time for the destruction of the world is prevalent in the Writings.This is what I found for the NWT translation of Rev 11:18
18 But the nations became wrathful, and your own wrath came, and the appointed time came for the dead to be judged and to reward your slaves the prophets and the holy ones and those fearing your name, the small and the great, and to bring to ruin those ruining the earth.”
I see a pretty big difference between "destroying" and "ruining" so I checked a good many translations, and indeed "destroying" is the most prominent.
I'm not big on Rev, so thanks for the incentive to pull it up.
CG, sorry, that was not supposes to be a personal remark, I have little time to post amd did not check the reply, it should have been I do not know if we can, and posting this stuff seems more erroneous than helpful.Of course it is. Why would you, a possessor of the truth, care what I think?
This is awful. I hope you are able to recover from this. God bless younever felt God in prayers, either. Some say they do, and I don't get it. The one time I know I put my whole heart in prayer was when I began saying the Lord's Prayer aloud while being raped. It got me a beating. Probably not God's answer, huh?
Yes, I notice a difference of wording. I haven't checked the Greek texts but the point I was bringing out is that God will bring to ruin/destruction (an end) all those ruining/destroying the earth. God will do it. Mankind cannot. That's what the Bible says.This is what I found for the NWT translation of Rev 11:18
18 But the nations became wrathful, and your own wrath came, and the appointed time came for the dead to be judged and to reward your slaves the prophets and the holy ones and those fearing your name, the small and the great, and to bring to ruin those ruining the earth.”
I see a pretty big difference between "destroying" and "ruining" so I checked a good many translations, and indeed "destroying" is the most prominent.
I'm not big on Rev, so thanks for the incentive to pull it up.
"and to destroy those who destroy the earth.”I'm afraid you're not reading it properly. Notice the last line please.
Revelation 11
We give thanks to You, O Lord God Almighty,
the One who is and who was,
because You have taken Your great power
and have begun to reign
18The nations were enraged,
and Your wrath has come.
The time has come to judge the dead
and to reward Your servants the prophets,
as well as the saints and those who fear Your name,
both small and great—
and to destroy those who destroy the earth.”
Yes, according to what I read of many translations is that the word "destroy" is used there. But when I checked the Interlinear and explanations for that Greek word I see various words used. Basically they mean ruin/utter and complete destruction -- you may find this at bible.cc.This is what I found for the NWT translation of Rev 11:18
18 But the nations became wrathful, and your own wrath came, and the appointed time came for the dead to be judged and to reward your slaves the prophets and the holy ones and those fearing your name, the small and the great, and to bring to ruin those ruining the earth.”
I see a pretty big difference between "destroying" and "ruining" so I checked a good many translations, and indeed "destroying" is the most prominent.
I'm not big on Rev, so thanks for the incentive to pull it up.
It does?"and to destroy those who destroy the earth.”
...
Destroy has the idea of punish, not annihilate.
God will not destroy this earth. He will do away with/destroy/bring to ruin those who ARE unrepentantly destroying the earth."and to destroy those who destroy the earth.”
To destroy those who destroy the earth means God will destroy the unbelievers who have no connection to God and are thereby destroying the earth by their disbelief. It has nothing to do with destroying the physical earth.
Destroy has the idea of punish, not annihilate.
That is what I believe.It does?