That's a heresy, modalism.Can you say what you think of this
What do you mean by modern? It was first used in the early 200s.Trinity is a modern word for the Biblical word Godhead
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That's a heresy, modalism.Can you say what you think of this
What do you mean by modern? It was first used in the early 200s.Trinity is a modern word for the Biblical word Godhead
Good try - but it won’t make any difference to his belief - HIS belief … only very little to do with a trinity belief as every trinitarian creates their own version of what they BELIEVE trinity is about.If we are not told we must be able to understand it, then why are people who don't believe in the Trinity Doctrine often labeled as a "heretic"?
Actually, both usages of distinct are adjectives - one meaning apparent, obvious (syn: definite, noticeable, recognizable, specific, unmistakable)
and the other meaning different, unconnected (syn: discrete, disparate, dissimilar, distinctive, divergent, diverse, offbeat, particular, peculiar, separate, special, specific, unique, various)
You are using the meaning of #1 in connection with the word distinct and yet #2 has as a synonym "distinctive" so when speaking of distinct wouldn't it also mean distinctive?
And when you say "3 different persons", what exactly do you mean because that seems to contradict how you are implying the word "distinct"?
#1 different (adj) dissimilar, unlike (syn: disparate, distinct, divergent, unalike, unlike, unsimilar)
#2 different (adj) various (assorted, diverse, various, varying)
#3 different (adj) not identical, other or distinct (another, distinct, other, discrete, separate)
#4 different (adj) unusual (bizarre, distinctive, extraordinary, offbeat, peculiar, rare, special, strange, unconventional, unique, unusual)
I don’t know what you are referring to. Please add some context.That's a heresy, modalism.
He’s making that up … ‘Godhead’ is not what the writer meant. The verse says that The Father was pleased that the Son should be filled with the fullness of Him. This is the occasion of Jesus being baptised (Anointed) with the SPIRIT OF GOD at the river Jordan. God spoke saying:What do you mean by modern? It was first used in the early 200s.
Exactly. I'm sure of it now, you are definitely smarter than I thought.... every trinitarian creates their own version of what they BELIEVE trinity is about.
I’m only speaking the truth. Praise God for His truth - Worship the Father, and to Him only, show reverential service!!Exactly. I'm sure of it now, you are definitely smarter than I thought.
Modalism, aka Sabellianism, is the idea that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are one person or hypostasis who presents in different modes to humanity. It was condemned at the Third Council of Constantinople.I don’t know what you are referring to. Please add some context.
Well, when compared to the 'ignore it when you can't understand it' of non-Trinitarians, I prefer the humbling experience of trying to move closer to the God who is greater than human comprehension.The ‘make it up when you can’t show it’ is what Trinitarians do to try to keep truth believers off balance.
Being a non-trinitarian myself, I honestly don't think most non-Trinitarians fall into a category of "ignore it when you can't understand it." I believe it is God's will for us to know Him and his Son Jesus Christ - that's not saying that we truly understand everything but we must know them in order to have fellowship with them.(snip)
Well, when compared to the 'ignore it when you can't understand it' of non-Trinitarians, I prefer the humbling experience of trying to move closer to the God who is greater than human comprehension.
Do you mean that you prefer a God that you cannot understand and can never know?Modalism, aka Sabellianism, is the idea that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are one person or hypostasis who presents in different modes to humanity. It was condemned at the Third Council of Constantinople.
Well, when compared to the 'ignore it when you can't understand it' of non-Trinitarians, I prefer the humbling experience of trying to move closer to the God who is greater than human comprehension.
Being a non-trinitarian myself, I honestly don't think most non-Trinitarians fall into a category of "ignore it when you can't understand it." I believe it is God's will for us to know Him and his Son Jesus Christ - that's not saying that we truly understand everything but we must know them in order to have fellowship with them.
"Simon Peter, a servant and apostle of Jesus Christ, to those who have obtained a faith of equal standing with ours by the righteousness of God and Savior Jesus Christ: May grace and peace be multiplied to you in the knowledge of God and of Jesus our Lord. His divine power has granted to us all things that pertain to life and godliness, through the knowledge of him who has called us to his own glory and excellence, 2 Peter 1:1-3
I believe our fellowship with God and our Lord Jesus Christ is enhanced when we truly recgonize who they each individually.
JMHO
You’ve only resolved part of it. You haven’t resolved the part about them talking to each other, and about each other. Body, mind and spirit of one person doesn’t resolve that.I believe our fellowship with God and our Lord Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit is enhanced when we truly recognize who they each are individually and who they are collectively. I'm aware that this is not an easy concept to understand as it is unlike anything else. However, when you think of a person as being composed of body, mind, and spirit -- three parts in one person -- it makes understanding the concept much easier.
To me the most difficult parts to understand are that a) God is Spirit (John 4:24, "God is spirit, and the people who worship him must worship in spirit and truth") and b) that Jesus created the world (John 1:1-3, "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was fully God. The Word was with God in the beginning. All things were created by him, and apart from him not one thing was created that has been created."
This is how I have resolved the difficult problem of the Trinity.
We know God as much as we can through our limited minds; but because of the nature of the infinite, we are necessarily infinitely away from understanding God in truth. I don't find the problem that God is infinitely greater than our ability to comprehend and it makes sense that there is true mystery within God's revelation to us.I believe it is God's will for us to know Him and his Son Jesus Christ - that's not saying that we truly understand everything but we must know them in order to have fellowship with them.
My body speaks to my mind and my spirit speaks to my mind and may spirit may talk to my body through my mind. Sometimes my flesh is weak even when my spirit is willing and telling it to do something different.You’ve only resolved part of it. You haven’t resolved the part about them talking to each other, and about each other. Body, mind and spirit of one person doesn’t resolve that.
I try to make truth my only preference with God.Do you mean that you prefer a God that you cannot understand and can never know?
How does a child know their father loves them?How do you then know that this God that you can never understand and never know carries any truth or reality in holiness and righteousness?
My experience with and my trust and faith in Him.Where do you start in the understanding of your God?
Maybe like One Family is comprised of distinct persons. Or One Human race is comprised of distinct people, all being unique, yet all human. I see the scriptures present ONE GOD comprised of Three Persons; Father, Son and Holy Spirit.We all know that the Father and the Son are not the same person. But here's the thing - How can they NOT be the same person if each is God and God is ONE?
Distinct NOT separate - "There is a distinction between those two words, in the theology of the Trinity." In the English language, distinct is a synonym for separate and separate is a synonym for distinct - a synonym is a word or phrase that means exactly or nearly the same as another word or phrase in the same language.
I don't object to people thinking about God any way they want to, if they think it helps them. My only objection is to people thinking that they know what or who God is and that any other way of thinking is wrong.Thank you… yes, there is a distinction.
I always use mankind who is made in God’s image as the example to help understand. Man is a tri-une being - spirit, soul and body (1 Thes 5:23) - each is distinct and yet one.
I understand that man is comprised of spirit and soul and body as it says in 2 Thess. 2:12 - Now may the God of peace himself sanctify you completely, and may your whole spirit and soul and body be kept blameless at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. Those components are what make a human being a human being! Those components are not three individual distinct persons making one complete person.I believe our fellowship with God and our Lord Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit is enhanced when we truly recognize who they each are individually and who they are collectively. I'm aware that this is not an easy concept to understand as it is unlike anything else. However, when you think of a person as being composed of body, mind, and spirit -- three parts in one person -- it makes understanding the concept much easier.
I understand the prologue of John from a different perspective.To me the most difficult parts to understand are that a) God is Spirit (John 4:24, "God is spirit, and the people who worship him must worship in spirit and truth") and b) that Jesus created the world (John 1:1-3, "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was fully God. The Word was with God in the beginning. All things were created by him, and apart from him not one thing was created that has been created."
This is how I have resolved the difficult problem of the Trinity.
My body is animated by my mind and spirit - my body is active because I have a mind and spirit. None of these components that a person is comprised of can live independently of one another.My body speaks to my mind and my spirit speaks to my mind and may spirit may talk to my body through my mind. Sometimes my flesh is weak even when my spirit is willing and telling it to do something different.
It is a given that not only the different religions, but many of the churches consider their belief the only true belief and reject the others,I don't object to people thinking about God any way they want to, if they think it helps them. My only objection is to people thinking that they know what or who God is and that any other way of thinking is wrong.
The Scriptures tells all about the nature of God, who God is… The problem is about people who have an agenda to destroy it and put their own ‘God’ on the throne….It is a given that not only the different religions, but many of the churches consider their belief the only true belief and reject the others,
I am not sure what you object or not object to has any traction in "What is the subjective nature of God or Gods?'.