Brian2
Veteran Member
More ingratitude -- which leads to a multitude of related "sins."
Should we be grateful to the serpent? Is ingratitude to the serpent what has led to the evil we have in the world?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
More ingratitude -- which leads to a multitude of related "sins."
Why did the god create serpents?
And some have read the scripture. According to that, Lucifer had a problem with authority, he refused to serve. "Non serviam" is his sin, i.e. disobedience. Other realm, same story.There are countless different thoughts, theories, opinions, etc. concerning Lucifer.
Most of which is pure guess work by filling in the blanks left by the Bible.
So depending on which one(s) you adhere to...
Some say Lucifer wanted to be Gods equal, some say he wanted to rule heaven, some say it was not actually God Lucifer had the problem with but Jesus.
See post #51Should we be grateful to the serpent? Is ingratitude to the serpent what has led to the evil we have in the world?
What is the Biblical definition? Where is the source?
Nope, not an assumption, but a conclusion.No one?
This is your assumption
It is. If there was a coherent concept, it would have spread.Better to say "I don't know about God"
Generalizing here is not correct
Only if you believe God created evil. I believe everything God created was very good, but humankind's perception is too worldly and immature to see so correctly.... Thus comes the story of Lucifer as being evil, rather than merely temptation which we are meant to learn to overcome.
I haven’t heard that Lucifer and Jesus had a beef I thought it was because God told Lucifer to kneel before man, His new creation or something to that effect.Seems it would depend upon when exactly he rebelled.
It seems likely that because his main objection was Jesus being sent to Earth as a human, that Lucifers rebellion was not until the New Testament.
Meaning that humans were around for a bit before the rebellion...
IF this is the case, then Lucifers rebellion would not have been the first sin.
Here is one source for the Lucifer/Jesus "beef"..I haven’t heard that Lucifer and Jesus had a beef I thought it was because God told Lucifer to kneel before man, His new creation or something to that effect.
You are free to believe thatNope, not an assumption, but a conclusion.
notIt is.
You seem to believe that internet is God or ...If there was a coherent concept, it would have spread.
And that proves? NadaWhat we can observe, is that people don't agree on a concept of god(s)
Yes, so whateven those in the same religion or denomination.
Not at allThat makes it an objective evaluation.
People have believed in gods for at least 5,000 years. And whenever they encountered someone else with a different god concept, they have killed each other. They had 5000 years without internet to settle their differences in a debate - but they didn't, because they couldn't.You seem to believe that internet is God or ...
OK, so we do agree on the data, at least something. What is your hypothesis that explains the facts? That only your god concept is right and everybody else got it wrong? Why isn't your god concept convincing?And that proves? Nada
Where exactly does the bible say that?I believe the poster who said pride, committed by Lucifer as the first sin was correct.
"Experiencing God" is not the same thing as God appearing, or acting. All the purported incidences of people experiencing God are references to purely mental events of theirs. When I say 'appear' I mean appear in public, in front of the cameras, as a real entity instead of an idea or notion generated internally by someone's brain.Again not correct; better avoid claims you can't prove, and stick to what you know, and stay away from generalizations when it comes to God
You better phrase it differently:
"I have never experienced God"
It isn't as if at different times in the past I haven't tried with complete honesty and openness.If you have never experienced God (the notion of God, you have), you come to that conclusion, this I totally understand, as I try to get first hand experiences myself; I don't see the use in "blind belief (without actual personal first hand experiences)".
I have no intention of making this any sort of personal attack on you. But this is a debate forum, where one can make one's point plainly and defend it if necessary.What more do I need? What is more rewarding than that? Know Thy Self!
Ok, I think that is a good point. Although I think sin is to reject God, or to be without God. And I think that was also the sin of Lucifer, and pride was just one sign of that.I believe the poster who said pride, committed by Lucifer as the first sin was correct.
Seems it would depend upon when exactly he rebelled.
It seems likely that because his main objection was Jesus being sent to Earth as a human, that Lucifers rebellion was not until the New Testament.
Meaning that humans were around for a bit before the rebellion...
IF this is the case, then Lucifers rebellion would not have been the first sin.
Thanks ... love the picture of the apple.From this site: What Is Sin? Definition and Bible Understanding).
I've seen better....love the picture of the apple.
But Satan, like Jesus, can do nothing without the Father. See the book of Job.We are told by Jesus whom the serpent is.
Sure we are to overcome temptation but the one who brought the flood of temptations onto humanity is satan, the serpent. Adam and Eve were not ready to know about good and evil and be tempted by it on every side and neither are we.