Shushersbedamned
Well-Known Member
We have a lot about glory so tell me, what does Trump need to do for it to be called a disgrace? Those who think he's not a disgrace already.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What would be a Trumpian disgrace?
- Thread starter Shushersbedamned
- Start date
He already is.
Shushersbedamned
Well-Known Member
I agree but those who say he isn't, I would honesty like them to think about it and say it - that thing he might do that would be disgraceful.
Audie
Veteran Member
Come on, Trump is anything but special.
The same sort of things that would disgrace anyone
apply to him. There is a long list.
How about if he meets Queen E and says
"How's ya doin';, Queenie?" and slaps her on the
back.
Last edited:
Audie
Veteran Member
Lets not be in a hurry to find out.
A year ago, I would have said that if Trump paid one of his affair partners to have an abortion, that would have done it.
... but that suggestion did come up a few months ago about Trump and Stormy Daniels and it didn't even raise an eyebrow, so now I'm not sure.
I think the story was a ridiculous, unreasonable conclusion not supported by the facts (it was some wild inference about the word "paternity" in an agreement between Trump and Daniels), but I didn't even see Trumpists dismissing it as false. The reaction was more "meh."
Shushersbedamned
Well-Known Member
Yes - Putin has been using that tactic of manipulation for many many years; push the limit just a little bit farther all the time until the people forget there ever was a limit.
Cacotopia
Let's go full Trottle
I imagine his trade war might break a few of these camel's backs, when the price of beer shoots up(and it will), they gone be pissed
Doubt they would blink an uncultured eye, But would like to see the Queen's guard clothesline him for it.
What if he spoke in glowing terms of admiration for a mass murdering tyrant? Would that be disgraceful?
stvdv
Veteran Member
14 jun 2018 stvdv 011 34
Or put it different. How much do Americans can take before they say "enough is enough". It is a democracy in US or not. They choose Trump.
Or put it different. How much do Americans can take before they say "enough is enough". It is a democracy in US or not. They choose Trump.
Last edited:
WalterTrull
Godfella
Don't leave out the Trumpettes! They're the ones who'll likely bring down the walls.
Starting a war under a false or fraudulent pretext might qualify.
Engineering the overthrow of a sovereign government or otherwise interfering in the internal politics of a sovereign nation.
Using the government's intelligence apparatus to spy on Americans or other world leaders without cause.
These are a few I can think of off the top of my head. Do you have any thoughts on this topic?
As I understood the OP, the question here is slightly but still significantly different from your interpretation of it. Out of curiosity, are you yourself able to discern that difference?
Kangaroo Feathers
Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
For some of them, I suspect the answer is "nothing". They're very good at rationalising by now.
I can't think of anything that would change the mind of the true believers in the Trump cult (to use a Republican's characterization of him).
Kangaroo Feathers
Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
"But we elected him as President, not saint". Seriously, they've already rationalised him having an affair with a literal porn star literal weeks after his wife delivered a child, and then literally paid her off. No, it's not the theoretical worst thing possible, but as far as scandalous behaviour goes, it's gotta be right up there
Authoritarian followers tend to be submissive and uncritical of accepted leaders.