What would falsify the theory of evolution?

[SkepticThinker]

I believe the Bible when it says that it is spherical in shape, anyway photographs and life experiences tell me so, and by that I mean real life experiences, or reports from people that can be believed as far as I am concerned. But thanks anyway. Isaiah 40:22 speaks of a spherical or round earth, and yes -- decent minds and observation tell us so as well. But regardless of imprints ascribed by scientists to dinosaurs that must have in their minds evolved to be flying creatures, I believe they made it up. Who knows? (Do you?) Maybe some dinosaurs did have feathers. That doesn't mean they eventually evolved to fly, does it? (No, it doesn't. But obviously in some minds it does.)

22 It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in:

Hmm, circles aren't spheres. Circles are two-dimensional shapes. Spheres are 3-dimensional shapes.

You believe scientists "made it up?" Seriously, you think that's what scientists do? You think that's what they're doing in those science journals and field work? Really?
And you say this while quoting an old book of unverifiable mythical tales that you accept at face value. Just wow.

 

[SkepticThinker]

YOU believe they are fictional. I no longer do. But again -- I thank you for expressing your opinion, I'm sure many even here would agree with you. I no longer do.
So you think you were a little cell. Just wondering. Did that little cell think? Once again, maybe that little cell that became YOU evolved to think during the time you were in your mother's womb? I do agree that a cell can grow (not evolve unless that's how you look at it) to become a human.

What are you even trying to say here?

 

[Polymath257]

So you think you were a little cell. Just wondering. Did that little cell think?

No. Single cells don't have the capacity to think.

Once again, maybe that little cell that became YOU evolved to think during the time you were in your mother's womb?

No. Development is not the same as evolution. Evolution happens between generations, development happens in a single individual.

I do agree that a cell can grow (not evolve unless that's how you look at it) to become a human.

Good. So you believe in cell-to-person development.

 

[YoursTrue]

No. Single cells don't have the capacity to think.


No. Development is not the same as evolution. Evolution happens between generations, development happens in a single individual.



Good. So you believe in cell-to-person development.

Yes, but! the process is too incredible to think/believe it came about by -- evolution. (Kind of by itself. although I think someone will say, "Oh, no, it's not 'by itself.'" -- whatever --) Sorry. You all can say whatever you want per scientists' theories about dinosaurs becoming birds, but again -- like the cell developing into you or someone else, it doesn't add up to evolution. Because that's how "you" say you got here, more or less. Now why? Because it doesn't make sense and no scientist can show it does make sense. Even if they publish tomes of literature with examination saying it DOES make sense. So -- with all that being said -- have it as you will -- I'm leaving it there.

 

[rational experiences]

In simple theories for a lack of human intelligence.

Did you science man invent the presence of a gas?

No.

Why do you lie?

I invented the presence of a gas myself as a man out of mass.

The very reason.

Scientists are liars are the first ever cult group against family. Theist designer first...natural human.

Theist designer built owned cities of his God of man...designer bad evil cult behaviours. Became science technology inventor.

Theist man versus family man.

The destroyer warning writing his new third bible.

Claiming new is old new.

 

[rational experiences]

One word one meaning only first.

Diction ary...one word by Conning co contriving sophists used one word Multi times to con by word meaning.

To contrive. By M removed...ary.

Man who destroyed his own holy ancient science themes.

 

[rational experiences]

Yes, but! the process is too incredible to think/believe it came about by -- evolution. (Kind of by itself. although I think someone will say, "Oh, no, it's not 'by itself.'" -- whatever --) Sorry. You all can say whatever you want per scientists' theories about dinosaurs becoming birds, but again -- like the cell developing into you or someone else, it doesn't add up to evolution. Because that's how "you" say you got here, more or less. Now why? Because it doesn't make sense and no scientist can show it does make sense. Even if they publish tomes of literature with examination saying it DOES make sense. So -- with all that being said -- have it as you will -- I'm leaving it there.

Is no different than claiming a dead dinosaur from a man's themed act of God star rock collision ...then a dead dinosaur returned a living man. Your human theists warning about human theists is exact. Evil thinking.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Yes, but! the process is too incredible to think/believe it came about by -- evolution. (Kind of by itself. although I think someone will say, "Oh, no, it's not 'by itself.'" -- whatever --) Sorry. You all can say whatever you want per scientists' theories about dinosaurs becoming birds, but again -- like the cell developing into you or someone else, it doesn't add up to evolution. Because that's how "you" say you got here, more or less. Now why? Because it doesn't make sense and no scientist can show it does make sense. Even if they publish tomes of literature with examination saying it DOES make sense. So -- with all that being said -- have it as you will -- I'm leaving it there.

What it incredible about it?

Here is the process in a nutshell:

Small changes add up over the years.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

Yes, but! the process is too incredible to think/believe it came about by -- evolution. (Kind of by itself. although I think someone will say, "Oh, no, it's not 'by itself.'" -- whatever --) Sorry. You all can say whatever you want per scientists' theories about dinosaurs becoming birds, but again -- like the cell developing into you or someone else, it doesn't add up to evolution. Because that's how "you" say you got here, more or less. Now why? Because it doesn't make sense and no scientist can show it does make sense. Even if they publish tomes of literature with examination saying it DOES make sense. So -- with all that being said -- have it as you will -- I'm leaving it there.

There you go again. You find it incredible. But your finding it incredible is not evidence against a scientific theory. I find it incredible too and I accept the science.

Cells developing into a person illustrates change over time very nicely in a package we can all see take place. And then watch an infant gradually grow older and change with time.

Again, there you go. Just because it doesn't make sense to you or you don't want to find any sense in it isn't evidence to falsify the theory.

Think of the billions of people that find what you believe to be incredible and that it doesn't make sense to them. What do you think that means for what you believe? Now apply that to something like evolution that actually has ever-growing piles of evidence.

 

[Subduction Zone]

There you go again. You find it incredible. But your finding it incredible is not evidence against a scientific theory. I find it incredible too and I accept the science.

Cells developing into a person illustrates change over time very nicely in a package we can all see take place. And then watch an infant gradually grow older and change with time.

Again, there you go. Just because it doesn't make sense to you or you don't want to find any sense in it isn't evidence to falsify the theory.

Think of the billions of people that find what you believe to be incredible and that it doesn't make sense to them. What do you think that means for what you believe? Now apply that to something like evolution that actually has ever-growing piles of evidence.

I have a huge problem with the "grow older" part. If I do not believe in that will it stop it from happening? Someone needs to answer soon

 

[Dan From Smithville]

I have a huge problem with the "grow older" part. If I do not believe in that will it stop it from happening? Someone needs to answer soon

There are a couple of documentaries on the subject from the 60's. In one, this brother and sister dive into a pool and come out in a pond in a land where they never grow old. It was on TV, so it must be true. Here it is on the internet, so it is even truer.

 

[YoursTrue]

There you go again. You find it incredible. But your finding it incredible is not evidence against a scientific theory. I find it incredible too and I accept the science.

Cells developing into a person illustrates change over time very nicely in a package we can all see take place. And then watch an infant gradually grow older and change with time.

Again, there you go. Just because it doesn't make sense to you or you don't want to find any sense in it isn't evidence to falsify the theory.

Think of the billions of people that find what you believe to be incredible and that it doesn't make sense to them. What do you think that means for what you believe? Now apply that to something like evolution that actually has ever-growing piles of evidence.

The science is not convincing. It is not only abstruse but conjectural. And that insofar as dinosaurs becoming ("evolving") to be birds, large or small. As far as putting on scientific lenses, yes, I can understand their line of reasoning. But that doesn't mean it's true. And if a person cannot admit that -- it's just something that is as it is right now.

 

[YoursTrue]

There are a couple of documentaries on the subject from the 60's. In one, this brother and sister dive into a pool and come out in a pond in a land where they never grow old. It was on TV, so it must be true. Here it is on the internet, so it is even truer.

Look, let's be honest. Instead of joking about it, why worry? Why even think about it, IF evolution is true, and if there is no intelligent force involved with life. And death.

 

[YoursTrue]

I have a huge problem with the "grow older" part. If I do not believe in that will it stop it from happening? Someone needs to answer soon

As it was told to Adam, from dust you are, and regardless of one cell being in your mother's womb, to dust you will return.

 

[YoursTrue]

There you go again. You find it incredible. But your finding it incredible is not evidence against a scientific theory. I find it incredible too and I accept the science.

Cells developing into a person illustrates change over time very nicely in a package we can all see take place. And then watch an infant gradually grow older and change with time.

Again, there you go. Just because it doesn't make sense to you or you don't want to find any sense in it isn't evidence to falsify the theory.

Think of the billions of people that find what you believe to be incredible and that it doesn't make sense to them. What do you think that means for what you believe? Now apply that to something like evolution that actually has ever-growing piles of evidence.

lol, I don't see the "piles of evidence," even though dinosaur fossils and that called humanoid fossils are said to have evolved.

 

[Subduction Zone]

The science is not convincing. It is not only abstruse but conjectural. And that insofar as dinosaurs becoming ("evolving") to be birds, large or small. As far as putting on scientific lenses, yes, I can understand their line of reasoning. But that doesn't mean it's true. And if a person cannot admit that -- it's just something that is as it is right now.

The science is not convincing only to the scientifically illiterate.

 

[Subduction Zone]

lol, I don't see the "piles of evidence," even though dinosaur fossils and that called humanoid fossils are said to have evolved.

And once again you admit that you do not understand the concept of evidence.

 

[F1fan]

The science is not convincing.

It does to experts. It is convincing to well-educated people.

And you show us consistently how poor your level of education is about science. And you are a creationist which is a religious view that includes contempt for science. So of course you aren't convinced.

It is not only abstruse but conjectural. And that insofar as dinosaurs becoming ("evolving") to be birds, large or small. As far as putting on scientific lenses, yes, I can understand their line of reasoning. But that doesn't mean it's true. And if a person cannot admit that -- it's just something that is as it is right now.

Yet the evidence in all the sciences are consistent with each other. There is no evidence or data that supports your kind of doubt. Experts in all the sciences keep doing their work, and what the results show is that the model of evolution is more and more verified as true. There are details here and there that are adjusted as more data is discovered, but the overall model remains conclusive. The only reason to doubt the science is due to bad influence by toxic creationism.

 

[rational experiences]

A man human is theist. Then designer. Scientist by understanding our earths mass to then machine man most evilest thinker man. Conversion.

Human man evil by want. Lack of reason as no reason is no excuse. Says my mother.

No reason for evil as no reason present mind changed. No excuse to believe man evil as it was burning spirit gas that hurt you.

Out of space mass is no UFO it was asteroid star mass only.

UFO earth machine ^ mountain tip O is your machine leaving earth by your terms. Converted earth. By men.

Man's maths says I use it calculate...react it...removed. Maths not mass.

Mass.
Ma Th s.

Man said TH numbers TH O TH God.

I used numbers to destroy mass.

God is mass holding.

You begin again in science only as mass what you changed is still present.

Same in the code maths evolution.

Your claim I letter code all things God is hence the code lying.

You use I meaning self a human man then symbolise I as intensity of magnetism.

I isn't magnetism.
I isn't intensity your letter what you say is the code that infers it for your identification babble science incoherent falseness. Just men.

So medical science exists because occult science caused its presence hurt humanity... both an evil history.

Healer medical natural human.

You say Gate opened power of heavens.

Bill..meaning I pass...I charge you is used by men in power. Names.

Yet you aren't power.

Gates in technology shifts to gates in medical. Both money makers...men in power.

Technology man using biology themes only means humans own its terms in machine technology thesis. By choice want. Isn't reality law.

If he was just machine theorising evolution it isnt even involved.

Machines history ^ mountain tip mass converted. First position a machine.

So earths machine is now leaving as man before as man now also forced human genetics to leave. He relates both to the same incident.

Yet he was only ever bio human. Not machine mass.

As O volcano open is gods law direct to heavens gas...is your advice.

So when you code as a human to place understanding occult science cult behaviours to preach teach evil...it's science only.

Natural law doesn't own codes.

You choose the topic. You choose the subject. You link any idea you want by a mans human choice.

My human mother can say hence men humans are evil as humans in human life. How many of you agree with a holy equal mutual man to woman's family life?

Not many in psyche of man's behaviours. Against natural woman.

Hence by your code and your review science the cult you man human must nearly be extinct. As human is one species human by body a human. Said a science destroyed body mind Stephen haw king. Science man leaving life.

Baby man science warning the theist.

Ask science a mutated bone human life biology sick is still quantified a human.

Is how a man is eradicating his presence out of human life as more and more men become homosexual man with woman. Man's genetalia.

So you ask men haven't you seen your penis image emerge in clouds also?

Yes.

But you don't talk about it.

 

[YoursTrue]

And once again you admit that you do not understand the concept of evidence.

Juries receive evidence. Sometimes the juries are prejudiced, sometimes the lawyers lie, sometimes the accused lies, and sometimes the jury makes the wrong decision, based on -- you guessed it --