What would falsify the theory of evolution?

[SkepticThinker]

Ah but we both have a clue--FACT, most of what you're claiming as proof of evolution is reduction of information, not addition of new information, FACT, most genetic mutations are harmful, not helpful.

That's just another outdated and debunked PRATT. It's like you're just going down the list of silly creationist claims from 30 years ago or something.
CB101: Most mutations harmful?
An Index to Creationist Claims

By the way, most genetic mutations are actually neutral.

 

[SkepticThinker]

I'm a prophet.
The other day I predicted that the waiter at the restaurant would bring me a steak.
Sure enough, 15 minutes later, there he was - with a steak!

Much better than the so-called prophecy under discussion because your prophecy actually occurred in a timely manner, rather then centuries later.

 

[SkepticThinker]

I have no need to do so, we both know there are millions of genetic differences between chimpanzees and people.

And you're not genetically identical to your parents, grandparents, siblings, cousins, even though you're related.
So what?

 

[Dan From Smithville]

I share features with apes, and features with some marsupials, and some bacteria. I am also a sentient person.

I am cognizant of the biology and already showed you, quote, "[Other apes of your choice, say, chimpanzees] and people have millions of genetic differences, which speaks against the given numbers for genetic mutations being favorable, genetic drift and etc."

What you say here doesn't make sense and doesn't show cognizance of biology, word use or sentence structure.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

I have no need to do so, we both know there are millions of genetic differences between chimpanzees and people.

So what.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

Can you explain why you believe this?

I don't think it says anything.

 

[rational experiences]

Birds ARE dinausours.
Just like humans ARE mammals.

Birds are birds warm blood...dinosaurs weren't. Cold blood.

Equals equals equals law.

Humans are humans. No I'm not the animal you look at. Exact advice a human sees an animal compares...human not the animal. Your information is fake.

In life human biology existed first.

In science man puts machine first his first ever earth mass thesis. Out of dusts came gods machine.

Humans owned spirit heavens first.

Man says now I'll give it to body machine.

Thesis no reaction. Mans god mind says machine body presence now equal in heavens laws to human body.

Fake comparison always is fake a con by humans.

Neither body human or machine reactive.

Human alive.

Machine dead. Machine already arose by alight gases Alchemy. Transcended space laws in Alchemy dark space cold mass no time.

Human hadn't evolved was highest term a human one presence with all ones...animal nature species two by two. All one each.

Humans use numbers. Humans count. Humans look to count.

Healthy one human the only type of human as " the " human.

As no man is God a human digging up dead things didn't bring me back from those bodies... the dead bodies.

Get the real teaching message warning yet...human to human equal equal is no theist no science no machine. Legal.

Ohhhh says I want to be the power in person human a God. Meaning I'm human only but want to inherit energy power. By science.

Compare. Dead decomposed not any human just a dead thing.

Digs huge ditches or mounds or holes to find it. A dead body out of holes.

Scientist theist. What causes a dead human now?

Huge ditches mounds holes in earth.

Why?

I pretended as just a human I owned the power of God.

How,?

By technology theism.

Oh a non reactive machine gives you gods evolution answers from dusts in your reaction?

Yes. Biology genesis of all things sacrificed removed. Not evolution. Huge earth holes mounds caused in earth body.

Humans. Not from dust above.
Humans not from dust below.

Hurt human from man's gods dust conversion. I want energy gods power to own.

His machine god first.

Ownership man in heavens is first only. I want gods reactive powers from above.

Okay. How did old bones be in earths ground no longer biological living.

Giant dinosaurs on earth in earths nature garden,? Were living.

Equals equals equals.
Living dinosaur garden nature living human garden nature living.

Not equals nor mutual. Fake thesis.

Dinosaurs just dead bones with huge earth indented mounds holes why.

Men comparing living Dino to living human claiming evolution from the dead.

Huge sun star mass hit...holes mounds and ditches opened...the dead is second. First is living only.

Not evolution. Dinosaurs are all just today dead bones too equalling holes earth ditches.

A living lizard cold blood is a miniature dinosaur.

A summation AI humans warning. Alien image owns new warnings said psychic human listen to advice...

Don't let lizard human government scientists kill us off. Theists of technology evolution from dusts. Humans con.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

What?!

That verse LITERALLY uses the word EVIDENCE:

Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not [yet] seen.

It can use the words, but that doesn't mean a thing.
It is talking about hope and unseen things.

That's literally wishful thinking.

 

[BilliardsBall]

That sounds exactly like blind faith to me.

If I study for a test I've not yet seen, I have more evidence I'll do better on the test that if I don't study.

Biblical faith is trust based on current evidence for something not yet seen/future. Just like studying for a test.

In this case, there is no curve on the test! Pass/fail, Heaven/Hell.

 

[SkepticThinker]

I don't think it says anything.

I don't either.

 

[BilliardsBall]

It can use the words, but that doesn't mean a thing.
It is talking about hope and unseen things.

That's literally wishful thinking.

No, wishful thinking is blind faith.

Biblical faith is trust based on evidence.

I study for an yet unseen test, you don't, we both think we'll do well, you have wishful thinking, I have evidence that indicates I'll perform well on the test.

 

[BilliardsBall]

And you're not genetically identical to your parents, grandparents, siblings, cousins, even though you're related.
So what?

But if we mapped my gene's and my dad's, we'd see direct, immediate descent. Not with chimpanzees!

 

[BilliardsBall]

So what.

The math on how biological mechanisms would evolve people from other apes is not in any way convincing--because besides the odds of genes passed by birth, countless biological and environmental factors have to be overcome.

 

[BilliardsBall]

What you say here doesn't make sense and doesn't show cognizance of biology, word use or sentence structure.

The math on how biological mechanisms would evolve people from other apes is not in any way convincing--because besides the odds of genes passed by birth, countless biological and environmental factors have to be overcome.

 

[SkepticThinker]

If I study for a test I've not yet seen, I have more evidence I'll do better on the test that if I don't study.

Well, that depends. If the test is on your knowledge of biology, and you studied for auto mechanics, you're probably not going to do better than if you didn't study at all.

Biblical faith is trust based on current evidence for something not yet seen/future. Just like studying for a test.

And when asked for evidence of God, you tell us you have faith and then give a definition that is basically just wishful thinking.

In this case, there is no curve on the test! Pass/fail, Heaven/Hell.

Oh no, this is Pascal's Wager. And it's bogus. It's not pass/fail, heaven/hell, 50/50 at all.

It assumes the choices are either "no god" or "the specific God I believe in and worship" which, of course, ignores the hundreds and thousands of other God(s) people have believed in throughout history (and currently), plus ones we haven't even thought up yet. It's not the 50/50 probability you've presented here. You could be worshiping the wrong God and doing the wrong things to get into heaven/hell. And since this is all based on “the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not [yet] seen,” we don't even have any evidence to determine anything.

 

[Subduction Zone]

The math on how biological mechanisms would evolve people from other apes is not in any way convincing--because besides the odds of genes passed by birth, countless biological and environmental factors have to be overcome.

It doesn't matter if you are convinced or not. Since when did you become an expert in the field?

In a case like this who do you think people should believe: A rank amateur that cannot do the math that he is disparaging or an expert that can convince other experts.

 

[Subduction Zone]

But if we mapped my gene's and my dad's, we'd see direct, immediate descent. Not with chimpanzees!

Of course we don't see that with chimpanzees. We are not descended from them, or vice versa. What we do see. Is clear evidence of relation.

 

[Subduction Zone]

The math on how biological mechanisms would evolve people from other apes is not in any way convincing--because besides the odds of genes passed by birth, countless biological and environmental factors have to be overcome.

Wow! An argument so bad that you had to make it twice.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

The math on how biological mechanisms would evolve people from other apes is not in any way convincing--because besides the odds of genes passed by birth, countless biological and environmental factors have to be overcome.

Can you explain that math and show me where you think it goes wrong?

How are you calculating the odds of the heritability of particular genes. Can you show me?

What biological and environmental factors have you found limit a conclusion of common descent?

 

[SkepticThinker]

The math on how biological mechanisms would evolve people from other apes is not in any way convincing

What math?

--because besides the odds of genes passed by birth

What do you mean?

Offspring inherit 50% of their DNA from each parent.
On average, children have about 70 new genetic mutations, compared with their parents.

So ... what do you mean?

, countless biological and environmental factors have to be overcome.

Like what?