Massimo2002
Active Member
Like let's say that everyone became board of sex would love still exist ?
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What would happen if every human being didn't have sexual feelings for other humans ?
- Thread starter Massimo2002
- Start date
-
- Tags
- sex
PoetPhilosopher
Veteran Member
Yes, love would still exist. One person can love another and not have sex with them or want to have sex with them. You love your children and your parents, yes?
I would imagine if people didn't have sexual feelings for one another, they would stop having sex, which would ultimately lead to extinction of our species.
Love would still exist as Humans love things, pets and family just fine without sex being an issue. As to sex because of Human intelligence we would make procreation a Job. Humans would understand that to survive replacements would be needed. Society would definitely be different though.
If we didn't have any sexual attraction I suspect we would be forced by the state to have sex - so as for the society to survive - can't wait for that to happen, but too late for me. 
I love a number of people for whom I have no sexual feelings.
Obviously.
Step 1 - stop conflating lust with love
Step 2 - stop conflating lust with love
Step 1 - stop conflating lust with love
Step 2 - stop conflating lust with love
Secret Chief
Degrow!
Rather handmaid's tale then.If we didn't have any sexual attraction I suspect we would be forced by the state to have sex - so as for the society to survive - can't wait for that to happen, but too late for me.
Why the hell would they force us to rape each other? How bizarre. You can just use sperm donation to reproduce.If we didn't have any sexual attraction I suspect we would be forced by the state to have sex - so as for the society to survive - can't wait for that to happen, but too late for me.
The Kilted Heathen
Crow FreyjasmaðR
Came here to add this part specifically as well.
Why do people immediately leap to "No sex? EXTINCTION!"? We have the technology, and in vitro fertilization is even able to break past issues with infertility and sterility. Without the physical act of intercourse we'd likely turn to that as a species to continue propagation.
I think your humour detector failed.
PureX
Veteran Member
Yes, it would.
PureX
Veteran Member
I think they would have sex for the sake of procreating. But not otherwise.
ChieftheCef
Active Member
Love is really broad, could we define it?
But that would never happen, that hasn't happened in the backwatrdist of times. People in monasteries screw.
But that would never happen, that hasn't happened in the backwatrdist of times. People in monasteries screw.
ChieftheCef
Active Member
We would die. We only have children because we feel things for those things we can't mention.
If it were a chirstrian utopia eventually the populace would give out from sheer fact of being a monkey, with toes and fingers, hands, feet, torsos, legs arms and a face and head to match and not being able to ****. That's why all of you are so pissed at everything.
People aren't really comfortable with having children without love.
idealist society 0
Reality 1
If it were a chirstrian utopia eventually the populace would give out from sheer fact of being a monkey, with toes and fingers, hands, feet, torsos, legs arms and a face and head to match and not being able to ****. That's why all of you are so pissed at everything.
People aren't really comfortable with having children without love.
idealist society 0
Reality 1
Sure, I believe it would. Love and sex are not the same things. People love one another now without having sex.
Of course, if we give up sex, the species would end when the most recent generation of babies age and die off.
Ok. Then the population would be greatly reduced, since we do not have a mass production means of artificial reproduction. I suppose that being bored with sex, the female population isn't also bored with pregnancy.
I love all of you guys. Don't get any ideas now.
The Kilted Heathen
Crow FreyjasmaðR
If things remained exactly as they are right now, maybe. But we're talking about hypotheticals here, not the current state of affairs.