Wildswanderer
Veteran Member
I kill and eat squirrels.I'm not so sure, Mestemia. He could be some sort of vegetable.
He might want to avoid wooded ares -- a squirrel might tuck him away for the Winter.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I kill and eat squirrels.I'm not so sure, Mestemia. He could be some sort of vegetable.
He might want to avoid wooded ares -- a squirrel might tuck him away for the Winter.
Well anyone that would listen to Nietzsche isn't too bright ...Faith: not wanting to know what is true." --Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche
Lol, naturalism has no explanation.You're seriously positing magic as an "explanation," and find that more reasonable than natural mechanism?
FalseHere you go, take your pick:
"Faith is the effort to believe what your common sense tells you is not true."[
--Elbert Hubbard
Ignorance"Faith - the ability to believe the ridiculous for the sublime."
--Rich Bennett
Again ignorance of what faith is.Faith is to the human what sand is to the ostrich
Speaking of which.... Speaking of areas you have poor or limited ideas of, and proclaiming with confidence, is ignorance as a flag of pride."Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel."
--Ambrose Bierce
And calling all faith one thing by the antics of children, is laziness too. Pot calling the kettle black, in other words."Faith is often the boast of the man who is too lazy to investigate."
--F.M. Knowles
Intellectual laziness."Faith is a cop-out. It is intellectual bankruptcy. If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits."
--Dan Barker
It may be defined that way, by those who are too lazy to investigate it properly. I hear no clear and realistic thought in this statement of ignorance."Faith may be defined briefly as an illogical belief in the occurrence of the improbable. A man full of faith is simply one who has lost (or never had) the capacity for clear and realistic thought. He is not a mere ***; he is actually ill."
--H.L. Mencken
False. It is wanting to know what is true, but beyond the human mind to grasp."Faith: not wanting to know what is true."
--Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche
But his beliefs and explanations are reasonable and logical. Your alternative religious beliefs are not.Richard Dawkins views on religion and faith, is hardly a voice of authority on the subject of religion! I place his opinions as not any better than just some armchair philosopher opining his views about God on any Internet forum full of neo atheists out there, not having any idea what he is really talking about. I heard a modern NT scholar refer to him as the "Village Atheist", who's "Not talking about any God I believe in". Dawkins is a biologist, not a philosopher.
Evolution is not a threat to faith. Ignorance is.
Now that is a whole lot of faith you got going on there.....False
Ignorance
Again ignorance of what faith is.
Speaking of which.... Speaking of areas you have poor or limited ideas of, and proclaiming with confidence, is ignorance as a flag of pride.
And calling all faith one thing by the antics of children, is laziness too. Pot calling the kettle black, in other words.
Intellectual laziness.
It may be defined that way, by those who are too lazy to investigate it properly. I hear no clear and realistic thought in this statement of ignorance.
False. It is wanting to know what is true, but beyond the human mind to grasp.
You really should quote the WHOLE paragraph:Quote time for me. What really is faith? What is behind it all?
“The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true art and science. He to whom the emotion is a stranger, who can no longer pause to wonder and stand wrapped in awe, is as good as dead —his eyes are closed. The insight into the mystery of life, coupled though it be with fear, has also given rise to religion. To know what is impenetrable to us really exists, manifesting itself as the highest wisdom and the most radiant beauty, which our dull faculties can comprehend only in their most primitive forms—this knowledge, this feeling is at the center of true religiousness.”
- Albert Einstein, Living Philosophies
That's faith, not this low hanging fruit definitions you quoted.
Define "naturalism."Lol, naturalism has no explanation.
And that’s not correct for this believer: I used to accept Darwin’s view on evolution before I met Jesus Christ, after that I rejected it not only that but apparently evolutionist view has changed from 30 years ago. What I’ve experienced since then is a relationship with God through Jesus Christ which changed the way I view life. As for me, there is Truth and Error, God has proven the Bible to be the Truth, He gave me His Spirit and opened my understanding to the Scriptures. It isn’t a matter of being threatened or my relationship to God changing or any of that. God tells me through His Word that there will be a deception in the last days to deceive people and it comes through Satan and demonic spiritual forces. So as for myself, I’m going to take those thoughts that are contrary to God’s Word captive and make them obedient to Christ.Evolution threatens their faith. They confuse how they read scripture as the same thing as belief in God. They can't tell the difference, and so if you question their interpretations of scripture, you question the existence of God in their minds. It's really not any more complex than that, IMO.
You yourself said we are spiritual. Are you New Age? I'm not.We aren't spiritual animals. That's new age nonsense.
I sense it bothers you to consider that other animal life forms outside ourselves, are actually cousins to us? Why?? I don't understand that. What bothers you about this? Does it make you feel smaller or something?And it leads to the Peter Singer type nonsense of making some chimps equal to humans. It's an animal rightests dream, and I know because I've had these conversations with them.
Oh, I see. It's the whole politiciation thing about "animal rights" that you are reacting against. No, this is not a philosophical or political thing.The whole animal rights agenda is rooted in a Darwinian evolutionary worldview.
Okay, yes. I understand this as a basis to resist this knowledge. It is a very anthropocentric view of ourselves and the world and our foundational relationship with it, that is at risk. This is very common. I think all of us experience that at first, to some degree or another.If all creatures and plants are merely evolved species, then one is not “superior” to another—just different.... a rose and a scorpion are as valuable and worthy of care as a human baby or a bull.
Ultimately, if you can not explain why you and the universe exist, you have really explained nothing.[
Define "naturalism."
Are you saying nothing can be explained, then?
Only he isn't. He's no relation at all because God created him to be a squirrel and then go back to the dirt, but you are made in the image of Yahweh and made to live forever in God's presence.He'd be like a 2 millionth cousin, instead of someone whos is a like closer on the evolutionary tree.
Do you trust what you find on Ancestry.com if you do a DNA test and it tells you and other people 2nd cousins, or 5th cousins, etc.? If not, why not? If so, then yes we are related to all animals on this planet.Only he isn't. He's no relation at all because God created him to be a squirrel and then go back to the dirt, but you are made in the image of Yahweh and made to live forever in God's presence.
Um yeah, because that DNA is all from humans.Do you trust what you find on Ancestry.com if you do a DNA test and it tells you and other people 2nd cousins, or 5th cousins, etc.? If not, why not? If so, then yes we are related to all animals on this planet.
The DNA difference is 98.2% the same, 1.8% different. Why do you say that is broad? Now, between a human and a squirrel, at this stage in evolution might be further down the ancestry tree with only like 50% the same, as we find in chickens.Um yeah, because that DNA is all from humans.
Even the difference between human and ape DNA is broad.
"Nothing" covers a lot of ground. So If I can't explain why the universe exists I can't explain how a four-stroke engine works?Ultimately, if you can not explain why you and the universe exist, you have really explained nothing.
And this is entirely based on folklore, with no actual supporting evidence at all -- except your faith, of course.Only he isn't. He's no relation at all because God created him to be a squirrel and then go back to the dirt, but you are made in the image of Yahweh and made to live forever in God's presence.
LOL! -- Human DNA is ape DNA.Um yeah, because that DNA is all from humans.
Even the difference between human and ape DNA is broad.
Ultimately, if you can not explain why you and the universe exist, you have really explained nothing.
I wonder how they would react when they find out that we are still apes.That may be the key point, the idea that their ancestors might have been apes seems to horrify some people to no end.
They'd probably fling poo at us.I wonder how they would react when they find out that we are still apees?
But because we have modern technologies, we fling poo at each other using our keyboards on the Internet instead.They'd probably fling poo at us.