corythesuit
Cory the suit
As a beginning historian I'm curious where people agree "history" actually began. Do we operate around written history or do we take into account the hearsay of the past?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The occurrence of written materials (and so the beginning of local "historic times") varies generally to cultures classified within either the late Bronze Age or within the Iron Age.
what about the Inca it did not have what most of the rest of the world would recognize as a writing system. No carved stone, no papyrus, no wedges pressed into clay, no lines painted on potsherds. but we can determine a certain amout of the "history" of the Inca with archeaology.would we discount Quechua legends and folklore in any serious investigation of Inca civilisation . of course theres Spanish written history.
In that case, we are writing the history.
It's just a line in the sand that doesn't mean much.
As a beginning historian I'm curious where people agree "history" actually began. Do we operate around written history or do we take into account the hearsay of the past?