stvdv
Veteran Member
Thank youHappy birthday - hope it was a good one.
The first 9 hours were good
Wish you also a happy day
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Thank youHappy birthday - hope it was a good one.
I have seen lo and many a creationist claim that
they are called "stupid",but, I have never seen
it actually happen.
Nor can any of them produce an example. Was that
a deluded statement on your part? I think it was.
Now, as for deluded-well, let us see what the word means.
: deceived by false beliefs
: having or characterized by delusional ideas
-deluded thinking
yep, that all fits, in varying degrees.
Among the serious ones, we count one who claims
the excess water from Noahs thing was wafted
to Neptune, where it shines to this day as a warning
beacon against incoming rogue angels.
Deluded?
Now, if you or any of your fundy friends can actually
demonstrate delusion, self deception, delusional
thinking on the part of an atheist here, by all means
do so!
Otherwise, sure,go ahead and say "delusional"
if it suits you. Without a reason, though, it would be
nothing but low name calling that says only
something about you.
Give it a try! If atheists are deluded, show us where
we are deceived by false beliefs.
Any time will be fine. How about now?
I think I understand. I'm not stupid in your eyes, merely delusional.
Do you frequently ask delusional people to deconstruct your belief systems for you? Do you find this practice productive somehow?
When Will Anti-Atheism Be Viewed as Bigotry?
Well written article on anti-atheism as "acceptable" bigotry.
Comments?
Maybe just factual.If you are trying to be sarcastic or otherwise clever,
you are going to have to try harder, the above is
just jabbering.
Maybe just factual.
A delusion is a persistent belief held without compelling evidence and despite countervailing evidence. If you stubbornly hold a conviction without empirical evidence and despite evidence to the contrary, aren't you delusional, by definition?
If you are trying to be sarcastic or otherwise clever,
you are going to have to try harder, the above is
just jabbering.
Audie, be accountable. You dared me to explain the problems in your worldview--just after calling me delusional.
Do you frequently ask delusional people to deconstruct your belief systems for you? Do you find this practice productive?
I did nothing of the sort. You are merely giving
redundant examples of your delisions.
As for your "question", that was addressed.
Asking again is jabber x 2, giving what,
Jabberwocky, perhaps.
Let's review:
Atheists have called people on this forum every kind of ad hom and stupid--before you disagree, you have accused me of jabbering even on this most recent ad hom post.
You disagreed stridently, saying atheists don't call Christians stupid but deluded, then dared me to show you where you are wrong.
So, do you often ask delusional people to deconstruct your worldview? Or is this limited solely to "being real" on the Internet?
Lets review;
Deluded does not mean stupid. Not
does the word "jabber".
Nobody has called you stupid, though of course
you can take any word you like, and
rearrange the letters, drop others and add some,
so that it says "stupid".
The question you keep asking is nonsensical.
Fits the definition of jabber.
As for "ad hom" I see a lot of people claiming
it, thereby demonstrating that they do not
understand the term.
"Jabber" and "delusional" do not mean
stupid; you are completely misusing
the words "ad hom" and "strident"
neither of which apply.
Is this simple ignorance, you just dont care,
or what?
delusion-
an idiosyncratic belief or impression that is firmly maintained despite being contradicted by what is generally accepted as reality or rational argument,
You might want to go back through your recent posts.
You never called me stupid, indeed, you wrote you never call Christians stupid, merely delusional. I pointed to the folly of your challenging me to redress your views when I'm delusional. You tacitly admitted I'm of sound mind with your challenges and all your posts, including this last one. Why tell me the difference between "jabber" and other words if I'm delusional?
Do you find it helpful to teach vocabulary words to define terms when debating delusional people?
Why would clarifying terms in a debate not be helpful? A delusional person isn't necessarily stupid.Do you find it helpful to teach vocabulary words to define terms when debating delusional people?
Why would clarifying terms in a debate not be helpful? A delusional person isn't necessarily stupid.
Perhaps a particular disagreement hinges on different interpretations of some particular term.
I think it's a waste of time to debate the delusional. When I witness outside the forums, I go to open-minded persons, not asylums.