What do you consider sin?
Sin is simply doing something that God does not agree with. He doesn't agree with it because it is always harmful to us or others in some way.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What do you consider sin?
I agree and disagree. I agree that most gods are out there, in some form for the various faiths, particularly in the case of Hinduism. I disagree that sin is associated with pleasure. Almost all sins are designed to promote one to NOT have pleasure. I know some Christians who firmly believe that the only position for sex is the missionary and strongly argue against oral sex in any form. Sin is something I strongly believe was conceived by these faiths to keep people in line with whatever rules the faith may have or have had. As for God and creation, I believe in evolution. There is just too much evidence that we evolved. The newest being that cave in South Africa which I find totally fascinating. A third evolutionary link as it were. And why can't God be big enough to have stirred the pot of evolution but still be big enough to have many faces?Christian sin is strongly associated with pleasure. especially sexual or against the possessions of others.
I can not imagine that there can be more than one creator God....When Creation was done it was done.
However this does not limit the possibility of other gods. The Jews and early Christians were certainly open to the Idea. that other people had other gods.
The distinction between Joy and pleasure is difficult to express but I am sure there is one. I do not believe that pleasure is necessarily selfish and that both pleasure and Joy can be shared. However Joy is an inner emotion that is mostly inward and personal and it is in response to something else. Whilst pleasure in momentary and is usually active.
How do you know for a fact that God doesn't agree with something? And what is wrong with stealing from a garden when one's children are starving? What is harmful about that? Or harmful about white lies that keep a person's confidence up and not delving into depression?Sin is simply doing something that God does not agree with. He doesn't agree with it because it is always harmful to us or others in some way.
<<<<<<<<<EXCERPTJoStories said: ↑
I find that the concept of sin is one of the most useless concepts ever to have come from the Christian or Jewish faiths. What do you consider sin?
How do you know for a fact that God doesn't agree with something? And what is wrong with stealing from a garden when one's children are starving? What is harmful about that? Or harmful about white lies that keep a person's confidence up and not delving into depression?
Buddhism is terribly joyless! We are obsessed with suffering and we spend all day staring into the void, we have no sense of humour at all..
Life is pain eh? Been there done that...
And what is wrong with stealing from a garden when one's children are starving?
God might well question the actions of the man that did not give to the starving poor, so that stealing was not necessary.The law found in the Bible for us to follow is there for our own wellbeing... If a person steals due to starvation I don't think God will judge them harshly
not quite as simple as that. Most sins have been put into God's mouth by men., for their own benefit.Sin is simply doing something that God does not agree with. He doesn't agree with it because it is always harmful to us or others in some way.
God might well question the actions of the man that did not give to the starving poor, so that steeling was not necessary
they do no harm they are not sins.
This basket full of bliss feels your pain. It's a dirty job, but someone has to do it, eh?Buddhism is terribly joyless! We are obsessed with suffering and we spend all day staring into the void, we have no sense of humour at all..
I really like this idea, Terry. Why is it that people feel we are just not good enough as we are? The idea being that most people are simply "good" people. I don't understand the need or twisted desire to micromanage the behavior of the ordinary person. Is orthodoxy the bane of joy? @Terrywoodenpicnot quite as simple as that. Most sins have been put into God's mouth by men., for their own benefit.
It is perhaps better to think of sins as those actions that harm other people or God's creation.
If they do no harm they are not sins.
ya gotta have humor.....
This basket full of bliss feels your pain. It's a dirty job, but someone has to do it, eh?
I really like this idea, Terry. Why is it that people feel we are just not good enough as we are? The idea being that most people are simply "good" people. I don't understand the need or twisted desire to micromanage the behavior of the ordinary person. Is orthodoxy the bane of joy? @Terrywoodenpic
To drawn an analogy, I appreciate a need for structure or rules and they are necessary to a degree, but one must also appreciate when the rules are no longer necessary. For example, when building a chair or a table, you MUST follow certain basic rules. You need to start off with a simple drawing with the measurements required. Double check to make sure it all works. Then you get your wood or whatever material and measure it 3 times first and then make your cuts once. After mock up, to ensure the pieces all fit together, one makes tiny adjustments and proceeds to the sanding stage. It's at this stage that one can toss aside the construction rules.
From this point you still need to follow surfacing rules, and finishing rules, but that is very much a mood thing or a creative thing. You need to follow the proper procedures for any given finish, but again you have a huge amount of leeway on how you want to finish, how smooth you want the surfaces to be, what stain or no stain, glue or nails, glue and nails, etc...
What I trying to say is that one needs to understand why the rules exist and from there one has considerable leeway on how to apply or ignore given rules. The rules are important, but understanding is the key. Am I babbling or does that make sense? I'm thinking of one carpenter from yesteryear who might like the analogy.
You know that reminds me of something I've said a number of times over the years. Laws aren't made for people like me. Here I mean the "Laws of the land", as it were. The point is that, by my very nature, I don't "break" those laws, as a rule (pun intended). The laws are in place to curb the behaviors of those who cannot exercise good personal judgment for whatever reason. In some ways, if people could embrace their natural joy, their natural grace, they would move more effortlessly through life because they would not need to pay attention to what they are doing that might be wrong. If they are in tune with their natural grace/joy they would not be doing anything wrong to begin with... well, not too much that really matters.Rules are for the ignorant And thoughtless. When you truly understand the implications they are no longer necessary. But will probably still be followed.
I'm unsure if that's more a matter with the modern Western difficulty with facing the reality of death rather than an issue of Christianity itself. My mom was Catholic and she passed away in a hospice this January, and she signed a DNR order. My sister, who lives on the other side of the country and who didn't have to deal with it in a direct way, was more upset about that than I was. I just wanted her suffering to end. I mentioned to a nurse at the hospice that what my mom was going through makes me wish that euthanasia was legal in those contexts.I would agree with you. I find that most Christian faiths, particularly the fundamentalists, are very without joy. As a Buddhist, I find life to be full of both joy and sorrow but that is the path of a Buddhist, to learn from our lessons in this life to be ready for the next. Having worked in nursing my entire career, I know firsthand that the people who are dying who are Christian are the most likely to be unable to let their loved ones go on. DNR or DNI is often rare among this group. Doctors have often told us nurses to enact a "slow code" with someone in their later years, such as over 90 and who are suffering horribly. A slow code means we walk VERY slowly to the patient and just really let them go. I can say with no difficulty that I have coded elders whose ribs I have broken with the compressions, and I mean that literally. I just wish Christians would let them go.