• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Which?

Poeticus

| abhyAvartin |
Namaste De Li,

Dear all,
During my study of Hinduism I have read “explanations” saying that if a child is abused, then this is because this child was “bad” in a previous life, God is punishing this child via Karma, and the perpetrator is merely God's tool, executing God's punishment. This to me is not the description of 'God who is without hate'! Also, when has it ever worked to use cruelty and pain as an educational means to turn someone into a better person?! On the contrary many abusers have been abused themselves!

Pray, do tell: which school (and which sect of that school) of Hinduism preaches the above?

M.V.

ps - I couldn't reply to this in the SikhDIR where it was posted (http://www.religiousforums.com/forum/3418332-post302.html), thus I posted it here, where it belongs, to develop and commence a conversation regarding this topic.
 
Last edited:

Fireside_Hindu

Jai Lakshmi Maa
As extreme as it may sound I bet this is a very common conclusion to come to if you are looking at Hindu Theology for the first time and don't quite get it. It's very hard for people to conceive of a universal law that doesn't involve punishment. Many people believe there should be "justice" even though it's impossible to come to a concrete definition of what that means.

I think it's a question worth addressing, if only to dispel the misconception out right.

:camp:
 

Vinayaka

devotee
Premium Member
Whoever wrote those 'explanations' didn't get it. Karma is a law, not a thing. One does not have karma, they have action, and because of karma, that action is returned in some way. Any person witnessing child abuse should understand that it is his or her duty to do something about it, and never stand idly by.
 

Fireside_Hindu

Jai Lakshmi Maa
Whoever wrote those 'explanations' didn't get it. Karma is a law, not a thing. One does not have karma, they have action, and because of karma, that action is returned in some way. Any person witnessing child abuse should understand that it is his or her duty to do something about it, and never stand idly by.


Agreed.

It always bothered me when people would overlook the poor with the logic that "It's their karma to be poor." That's an excuse to maintain apathy. I have a duty to my fellow man to help lift him up regardless of what actions are being revisited upon him. It could (and most likely will) be me in his position one day and I will need compassionate souls to treat me with dignity.

A child stricken with cancer isn't being punished for past actions she can't remember. Natural cause and effect has brought her to this point. As people on the outside our only duty is to care for her and love her as much as we can. Past deeds don't (shouldn't) enter the equation when we decide how to conduct ourselves with others.

As to why God would allow such things to happen...

If we believe that one day we will achieve unity with God and that at the most basic level we are in fact God, the only one doing anything is ourselves. We do this to ourselves, individually and collectively. We can change the course of our fortune by altering our behaviors and thoughts. That is my understanding anyway - please correct me if I don't quite have it.

:camp:
 

Vinayaka

devotee
Premium Member
Natural cause and effect has brought her to this point.

Which is karma, but that's about where it ends. The idea of Karma should be applied when viewing bad things happening to yourself, not to others. It really helps to understand it so you don't whine like a baby, "Why me? Why me?"

But it doesn't apply to everything at all. If you run your car into the ground, or some law doesn't go in your favour, it's not karma. In the first case its your own stupidity for not getting it fixed, and in the second place it's just the law.
 

Poeticus

| abhyAvartin |
Namaste,

Thank you FS-ji and Vinayaka-ji for your awesome comments. The only buzzkill is that the person this thread was for is offline. I have sent him a PM inviting him to partake in this conversation if he would like when he gets online again.

M.V.
 
Last edited:

bp789

Member
मैत्रावरुणिः;3418361 said:
Namaste De Li,



Pray, do tell: which school (and which sect of that school) of Hinduism preaches the above?

M.V.

ps - I couldn't reply to this in the SikhDIR where it was posted, thus I posted it here, where it belongs, to develop and commence a conversation regarding this topic

I don't know if any Hindu sects actually preach this, but I know among some Indians, karma is viewed as punishment for things you did in your past lives. In my experience, I know of many Indian mothers that have said stuff like "What sins have I committed in my past life that I had to see this day??!!" whenever their kids do something they don't like :p
 

Vinayaka

devotee
Premium Member
Lots of Hindus have varying understandings on many of our concepts. Karma, sin, myth or history, etc. This does not mean that all or even any of of them are right.
 

Poeticus

| abhyAvartin |
Lots of Hindus have varying understandings on many of our concepts. Karma, sin, myth or history, etc. This does not mean that all of them are right.

Namaste,

...exactly....thus, I don't understand the rudimentary approach when people conclude that hearing "explanations" means all Hindus believe in those "explanations"....

I wonder from where (and whom/what) those "explanations" were received. This would be something that I would inquire about first.

M.V.
 

Jainarayan

ॐ नमो भगवते वासुदेवाय
Staff member
Premium Member
मैत्रावरुणिः;3418361 ps - I couldn't reply to this in the SikhDIR where it was posted ([URL="http://www.religiousforums.com/forum/3418332-post302.html" said:
http://www.religiousforums.com/forum/3418332-post302.html[/URL]), thus I posted it here, where it belongs, to develop and commence a conversation regarding this topic.

Actually you could. In any green DIR if you have something pertinent to contribute, you can post as long as it's not debating. The blue and purple forums are restricted. The green DIRs are a lot more open.
 

Jainarayan

ॐ नमो भगवते वासुदेवाय
Staff member
Premium Member
Now, as for my .02 on the matter, to stand by and do nothing makes the bystander guilty of a heinously adharmic act. It's not for us to adjudicate karma. It may be that person's prarabdha karma to be saved by one of us, and our dharma to save the person. To stand by is as heinous as standing by watching an old person or animal being beaten or abused. I could dig up a thousand verses from the Bhagavad Gita supporting what may be our duty (well, not a thousand since there are only 700 to begin with :p).
 
Last edited:

Poeticus

| abhyAvartin |
Actually you could. In any green DIR if you have something pertinent to contribute, you can post as long as it's not debating. The blue and purple forums are restricted. The green DIRs are a lot more open.

Namaste JN-ji,

Ah! Thank you for the clear-up! I wish I had consulted you earlier before making a thread on the matter.

I just didn't want to get too Hindu-like in a Sikh thread, where the conversation would most certainly have led to a debate.

The last thing I want is to be a nuisance to my Sikh brothers and sisters.

M.V.
 
Last edited:

Jainarayan

ॐ नमो भगवते वासुदेवाय
Staff member
Premium Member
I know of many Jewish mothers that have said stuff like "Oy! What sins have I committed in my life that I had to see this day??!!" whenever their kids don't make it through medical school :p

Fixed. :D
 

Jainarayan

ॐ नमो भगवते वासुदेवाय
Staff member
Premium Member
मैत्रावरुणिः;3418634 said:
where the conversation would most certainly have led to a debate.

That's when you have to know when to hold 'em and when to fold 'em. :D
 

De Li

New Member
Namaste,
apologies for the late reply, I was indeed offline until now.
I can only respond quickly now too. This is a quote from 'Living with Siva' - from the Himalayan Academy a Shaiva school:
quote
"Whenever we are injured or hurt, we understand that our suffering is but the fulfillment of a karma we once initiated, for which our injurer is but the instrument who, when his karma cycles around, will be the injured."
quote end.

and this quote is from realsikhism.com - the actual quote that upset me so much in my queries into Sikhism:
quote:
"If God creates new souls, then why are children born with disabilities? Souls are born with disabilities because of the bad deeds they committed in their previous life. It is up to God if he sends the soul to hell to make it realize the consequences of its actions or be born and make it realize in its next life."
quote end.


Just to quickly explain where I'm coming from: I totally understand that the above view of Karma etc. is one way to look at it; and it is one theory amongst others I came across during my more extensive studies of Hinduism.
However, when I started learning about Sikhism recently - and because I have studied religions quite a bit, I directly look for how key concepts are conceived, I came across above quote on a Sikh site.
So my worries were / are if Sikhism holds to this particular [bad] view of Karma and suffering.

I'm sorry for this short and rambling reply, I'll revisit later.

Best regards,

De Li

PS this forum does not allow me to link the websites I have found the quotes on, which I would provide otherwise.
 

Vinayaka

devotee
Premium Member
I agree with the explanation from Living with Siva. Perhaps it did go into further detail as well. The idea of punishment is one area where ideas vary on it. Who is the punisher, and what is punishment? It seems that in the second one, God is perceived as an outside force punishing for misdeeds, similar to an Abrahamic concept, "God will get you for that."
Whereas, in my view, it is a result of your own action similar to having a broken arm if I get angry, and hit the wall, or if I just to stupid things like daredevil acts. It's a result of stupidity ... mine, or a result of anava.
As for the handicapped child, yes, that is karma. Not punishment from an external source. There is also karma being accrued every minute of every day. Every action has a reaction. The child in the wheelchair is much different that the child who is starving, because there is something we can do about the second situation. We can fix it - completely, and then that too will return to us. Perhaps in some future life, our needs will be met more easily that ever. But for the child in the wheelchair, other than compassion, or buying a new wheelchair, or offering to pay for health care, there really is very little we can do as to action.
But as for some external God punishing ... no. That's like saying it's the policeman's fault for the criminal being in jail.
 

ratikala

Istha gosthi
namaskaram :namaste

Namaste,

This is a quote from 'Living with Siva' - from the Himalayan Academy a Shaiva school:
quote
"Whenever we are injured or hurt, we understand that our suffering is but the fulfillment of a karma we once initiated, for which our injurer is but the instrument who, when his karma cycles around, will be the injured."
quote end.
and this quote is from realsikhism.com - the actual quote that upset me so much in my queries into Sikhism:
quote:
"If God creates new souls, then why are children born with disabilities? Souls are born with disabilities because of the bad deeds they committed in their previous life. It is up to God if he sends the soul to hell to make it realize the consequences of its actions or be born and make it realize in its next life."
quote end.
Just to quickly explain where I'm coming from: I totally understand that the above view of Karma etc. is one way to look at it; and it is one theory amongst others I came across during my more extensive studies of Hinduism.
However, when I started learning about Sikhism recently - and because I have studied religions quite a bit, I directly look for how key concepts are conceived, I came across above quote on a Sikh site.
So my worries were / are if Sikhism holds to this particular [bad] view of Karma and suffering.

I'm sorry for this short and rambling reply, I'll revisit later.

Best regards,

De Li
may I sidetrack a little and give lord buddhas take on this , .....

he explains very carefully that in the embodied realm , everything is basicaly suffering , ' Dukka ' ...sure this world has its benifits but it also has its detrements .
some will be fortunate enough to be born into a good family , but might lack the motivation or the inteligence to use the benifits of his life wisely , another may be born poor or dissabled yet be blessed with wisdom and inteligence with which he will realise the true purpose of life .

in this case we might experience suffering in many ways in this life , but what might at first seem to be a blessing turns out to be a curse , such as wealth and beauty , as beauty fades and wealth all to often buys us only false freindships and brings about its own troubles.

and of suffering ? .... allthough we would not wish suffering of any kind upon any one , ...what purpose might it serve ? suffering is the one thing we canot escape in this human realm , birth , old age sickness and death come to us all , and were life to be without suffering we would not question what this life is , and for what purpose we are granted life if it wernt for the realisation of the truth , .....were life perfect and without fault or failing would we strive for libberation? .... would we desire to be born in the heavenly realms and to be free from human ignorance ?

when a hindu says ....
"Whenever we are injured or hurt, we understand that our suffering is but the fulfillment of a karma we once initiated, for which our injurer is but the instrument who, when his karma cycles around, will be the injured."
he is acknowledging the cycle of birth , deathand rebirth , and that during any embodied life we commit action ; Karma , these actions must have reactions ,..therefore we have in previous lives comitted so many actions which if not purified by renunciation , must have implications which will be played out in subsequent lives , we will have mixed reactions some good some bad , but most of all having this store of karmic reactions propells us in to another life into which we could be the injured or the injurer , neither of these are desirable situations , it is not some god given punishment it is simply a concequence of embodied birth , we canot go through life without being either the injurer or the injured , therefore we cause more of the same . even when we are mindfull not to injure still we might injure by acident or be forced to injuer as a part of our duty . the only way to escape this is to refrain from taking another human birth , and to do this we must be free from human desire .


the next quote raises the question ...[/QUOTE]"If God creates new souls, then why are children born with disabilities?''
,............and answers it a litle unskillfully by saying ....
'' Souls are born with disabilities because of the bad deeds they committed in their previous life.''
.........when ever we are born in embodied form we posess some kind of dissability , some visable some hidden , ...we might be aware of physical dissabilities as they are visable to the eye but some perfectly formed beings lack other important atributes which may be more of an impediment to our spiritual growth and consiousness , in truth nothing is as it appears to our conception as our conception is coloured by dellusions as to what is benificial and what is not .
''It is up to God if he sends the soul to hell to make it realize the consequences of its actions or be born and make it realize in its next life."
the buddhist in me would say that hell is very much with us here in this life time , those that are born with strong attatchments and cravings are in a hellish state of mind at all times and are perminantly tortured by their own desires as they can never be fulfilled , but those that rejoice in the realisation of the truth and who seek higher understanding are facing the heavens and are blessed with happiness and are perfectly sattisfied , these are the extremes of human understanding and between then lay many permutations of human experience . if the tortured man were able to renounce his attatchment to worldly desires he would be able to experience the bliss of heaven and trancend physical form and future suffering .

in ways it is difficult to translate an understanding of karma and fruits of karma without taking it too literaly ...and for a westerner difficult not to impute heaven or hell as places into which we are flung by a judgemental god , the dharmic veiw is very different .
 
Top