Nimos
Well-Known Member
This is a bit of a weird question
But as most people know, when you do the math there are certain rules. But who decided that?
A quick example is:
1 + 2 * 2 = 5
But if we don't respect the rules of math it would be:
1 + 2 * 2 = 6
and obviously, if we wanted to get 6 while respecting the rules, we would use ( ):
(1 + 2) * 2 = 6
A quick google on this says this:
- Because multiplication is more powerful than addition. We always do what is more powerful first. Any other ideas to add to that? - It's repeated addition so we can break down to an easier way to understand.
But is there any specific reason for it being or ending up like that and who decided that this is how it should be? Because one could imagine that the first people doing/inventing math could have disagreed on what should be done first, we are humans after all
But as most people know, when you do the math there are certain rules. But who decided that?
A quick example is:
1 + 2 * 2 = 5
But if we don't respect the rules of math it would be:
1 + 2 * 2 = 6
and obviously, if we wanted to get 6 while respecting the rules, we would use ( ):
(1 + 2) * 2 = 6
A quick google on this says this:
- Because multiplication is more powerful than addition. We always do what is more powerful first. Any other ideas to add to that? - It's repeated addition so we can break down to an easier way to understand.
But is there any specific reason for it being or ending up like that and who decided that this is how it should be? Because one could imagine that the first people doing/inventing math could have disagreed on what should be done first, we are humans after all