SSDSSDSSD3
The Great Sea Under!
Subjective experience always fails in logic. I'm also a theist, (monotheistic), but if you're mentioning personal experience it really means emotion over logic.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Who do you think will prove or disprove gods?
- Thread starter Taylor Seraphim
- Start date
That may make sense in some contexts, but those will be unavoidably very restrictive ones.
I don't see how they could be reconciled with the implicit universality present in the OP.
Taylor Seraphim
Angel of Reason
Look just because John thinks santa is real and Lilly does not think santa is real does not make them both right.
True. How do you propose to deal with that with your concept of subjective, true proof?
Taylor Seraphim
Angel of Reason
I do not believe in subjective true proof!
I have stated many times that anything "proof" that is subjective cannot be true!
Please try to read what I say before responding
SSDSSDSSD3
The Great Sea Under!
opinions can be a form of subjective proof.I do not believe in subjective true proof!
I have stated many times that anything "proof" that is subjective cannot be true!
Please try to read what I say before responding
outhouse
Atheistically
They are both wrong. The real Santa is dead and no longer exist, yet Santa exist as parents still fill that role.
He existed historically and mythology developed.
So maybe what you are looking for is an unbiased truth about the whole situation surrounding the mythology of the god concepts.
Taylor Seraphim
Angel of Reason
An opinion is not proof.
Can I say that I have proven a unicorn exist by saying I have the opinion that unicorns exist?
Taylor Seraphim
Angel of Reason
The parents and the historical figure of St. Nicolas are not Santa as they meant by the word however so this point is null.
Sorry. Somehow I saw a comma in #21 despite it not being there. My bad.I do not believe in subjective true proof!
I have stated many times that anything "proof" that is subjective cannot be true!
Please try to read what I say before responding
Taylor Seraphim
Angel of Reason
Sorry, but I felt really insulted to be accused of thinking that.
No insult meant, and it was my mistake. No ifs, ands or buts about it. So don't be sorry.
Taylor Seraphim
Angel of Reason
I am sorry for letting myself becoming emotional back there.
Gee, it is not like it never happens with anyone else. Forget it.
outhouse
Atheistically
Taylor Seraphim
Angel of Reason
What I was saying is that santa as in a parent providing toys is not the same as the santa they where thinking of, thefore the santa they where thinking off does not exist.
thevoiceofgod
Active Member
I can see you didn't read my whole post or didn't understand it.
thevoiceofgod
Active Member
It can't be proven that we're living in a computer generated simulation either.
outhouse
Atheistically
Taylor Seraphim
Angel of Reason
Never been to the mall at xmas ?
Because he totally flies in a sleigh.