Unveiled Artist
Veteran Member
God is not three separate [persons].
God is One, i.e. undivided, insurmountable.
The ancients, prophets notwithstanding, all had the same problem with dividing God into personages. Compare Deuteronomy 32:39 with Isaiah 37:20, for example. The author of Deuteronomy was momentarily able to acknowledge God as God, in that His control of Heaven and Earth are absolute, in His hand. Isaiah backpedals in that regard, relegating earthly control to that of a nationalist adversary. The same stumbling block exists in the "god of this World" idea (which also accompanied Zeroatrianism.)
They tried to combat this by reiterating that "God is One", even reinforcing with the idea that all things in Heaven and Earth are in "His hand", but also constantly receded into the natural delusion which says that "Ye are gods, sons of the Most High."
If you recall, Jesus brought this to the attention of the Pharisees and others of his time. It is true that we perceive ourselves as sons of God, and by relation, gods and judges ourselves. But, we are not gods. Instead, it was revealed: "Judge not, lest you be judged," and "The Father Himself judges no one..." God knows all things, and therefore judgement can only be considered an obvious redundancy to the Creation narrative. The Father does not judge the Son; He knows him.
Not only Jesus, but the Son of Man, is the manifestation of the Father; the Father's Holy Spirit; the Father's Word in flesh and blood.
Once you make the Father flesh, he is no longer the Father. His identity may mirror or represent the father but he is no longer his father for the reason the father has no flesh. There is no manefestation (according to scripture) of the father. Jesus is the "representation" of his father.
When you represent or be in the image of someone, you do not become that person regardless if it is "called" a manefestation or a literal person. The fact is representation and image of keeps the source separate from what the representative or image is the representative or image of.
Jesus can be the manfestation of his father.
He can have the spirit of his father
He could have the same nature of his father
Of-being a key term.
But the fact that of is used, it automatically one separates Jesus from his father because he is flesh
Another reason it separtes Jesus as a separate person (again lack of a better word) than his father is the use of the word "image of"'
It is English grammar not metaphysics. Unless there is another definition trinitarians use outside the bibe, the prepositions will always separate the Father from Jesus.
When you make Jesus a manefestiation of the Father (sounds sci-fi imo) you make it more pagan. A spirit becoming a person.
That's not scripture. It's pretty blunt. Maybe the Church put the metayphysics in, as so I hear and read.
If they did and you are right that it is in the Bible, remember the Church put the Bible together. But they didnt define Jesus as the Father. Unless Christianity is Romanized?
I say that because the Jews definitely dont see Jesus as god and knew this in the NT. Unless Christians are calling Jews liers? That would mean most of the OT would contradict what Jesus referred to himself and his father in the new.
Last edited: