Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
OK, God exists, but he (she or it) clearly hates amputees, a prayer that is never answered.
Really? Because it sounds exactly the same to me. Can you provide me with a clear example of the above happening.No individual is capable of supernaturally healing anything at will. Such a power does not exist. What we believe is that every once in a while those of exceptional holiness (and humility) just may have their petitionary prayers answered in a much more direct way than what is usual. And no, I'm not talking about those dubious, televangelist con men.
Please demonstrate that this has ever actually happened.Again, the priest has no power whatsoever, he can only ask God to intervene which can only happen as God, not the priest, wills.
Then please provide the evidence of them so that I can give them an honest look. A single, grainy YouTube video of unknown origin is not sufficient.There are thousands of cases such as this. Cancers being cured, hosts turning into real human tissue, stigmata, apparitions and possessions and so on. These phenomena are worth at least an honest look, but we live in an age where the dominant framework considers it all impossible.
And you're beyond naive if you seriously believe that the existence of supernatural healing abilities will be "ignored" by people for no good reason whatsoever. I'd love for their to be a cure for cancer or blindness, and for this cure to simply require deference to some form of higher being. I'd be overjoyed if such a thing exists - as would millions of people around the world, not to mention the millions of scientists and doctors who have devoted their lives to developing a cure for cancer or blindness. To suggest that all of these people just "ignore" such supposed miracles is not only naive, but an insult to the intelligent, honest and dedicated people of this world who work tirelessly and selflessly to help those in need - as well as the people who suffer from cancer or sight loss.You're naive if you think any of it will generate real attention by those determined to ignore it.
Really? Sorry about this Talog, but I could not help myself.
Please demonstrate that this has ever actually happened.
Even Jesus had to ask God, the eternal father, for permission to use his omnipotence to raise Lazarus.
John 11
41 Then they took away the stone from the place where the dead was laid. And Jesus lifted up his eyes, and said, Father, I thank thee that thou hast heard me.
42 And I knew that thou hearest me always: but because of the people which stand by I said it, that they may believe that thou hast sent me.
43 And when he thus had spoken, he cried with a loud voice, Lazarus, come forth.
44 And he that was dead came forth, bound hand and foot with graveclothes: and his face was bound about with a napkin. Jesus saith unto them, Loose him, and let him go.
There are thousands of cases such as this. Cancers being cured, hosts turning into real human tissue, stigmata, apparitions and possessions and so on. These phenomena are worth at least an honest look, but we live in an age where the dominant framework considers it all impossible.
Then please provide the evidence of them so that I can give them an honest look. A single, grainy YouTube video of unknown origin is not sufficient.
by John and Anne Spencer
There have been many reports of stigmata over the years but few have been closely studied. John and Anne Spencer were given a rare opportunity to do so, with the help of the late Mrs Heather Woods.
Over the past 770 years around 300 to 350 people have reported an extraordinary phenomenon. They have displayed, for all to see, wounds on their bodies - and particularly their hands and feet - that they believe represent the crucifixion wounds of Jesus Christ. Research shows that within religious circles there may have been many more stigmatics; many believe that their suffering is a private experience not to be made public. Certainly one recent case, Mrs Heather Woods of Lincoln, only made her marks public when she was 'told' in a message from the Lord that they could be.
http://www.assap.ac.uk/newsite/articles/Stigmata.html
And you're beyond naive if you seriously believe that the existence of supernatural healing abilities will be "ignored" by people for no good reason whatsoever. I'd love for their to be a cure for cancer or blindness, and for this cure to simply require deference to some form of higher being. I'd be overjoyed if such a thing exists - as would millions of people around the world, not to mention the millions of scientists and doctors who have devoted their lives to developing a cure for cancer or blindness. To suggest that all of these people just "ignore" such supposed miracles is not only naive, but an insult to the intelligent, honest and dedicated people of this world who work tirelessly and selflessly to help those in need - as well as the people who suffer from cancer or sight loss
Not everyone in the pharmaceutical industry what's to see cancer cure all the time the a making billions on chemotherapy drugs.
Not everyone in the pharmaceutical industry wants to see cancer cure, all the time they are making billions on chemotherapy drugs. The FDA went all out to stop this guy just to protect the pharmaceutical industries profits and their back hander.
ABOUT BURZYNSKI, THE MOVIE (PART I):
Burzynski, the Movie is an internationally award-winning documentary originally released in 2010 (with an Extended Edition released in 2011) that tells the true story of a medical doctor and Ph.D biochemist named Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski who won the largest, and possibly the most convoluted and intriguing legal battle against the Food & Drug Administration in American history.
His victorious battles with the United States government were centered around Dr. Burzynski's gene-targeted cancer medicines he discovered in the 1970's called Antineoplastons, which have currently completed Phase II FDA-supervised clinical trials in 2009 and has been given permission by the FDA to begin the final phase of FDA testing–randomized controlled clinical trials.
When Antineoplastons are approved, it will mark the first time in history a single scientist, not a pharmaceutical company, will hold the exclusive patent and distribution rights on a paradigm-shifting medical breakthrough.
Antineoplastons are responsible for curing some of the most incurable forms of terminal cancer. Various cancer survivors are presented in the film who chose these medicines instead of surgery, chemotherapy or radiation - with full disclosure of medical records to support their diagnosis and recovery - as well as systematic (non-anecdotal) FDA-supervised clinical trial data comparing Antineoplastons to other available treatments—which is published within the peer-reviewed medical literature.
One form of cancer - diffuse, intrinsic, childhood brainstem glioma has never before been cured in any scientifically controlled clinical trial in the history of medicine. Antineoplastons hold the first cures in history - dozens of them.
Give me one good reason why these abilities (either Gods or an individuals) have not or cannot be demonstrated under reasonable scientific conditions.
Because it would expose God to the world taking away the mission of all that believe in his name. Faith will merge into fact and our trial will be made impossible to conduct.
OK, God exists, but he (she or it) clearly hates amputees, a prayer that is never answered.
And yet, according to Tlalog, there are people today who are able to miraculously heal blindness on video. Maybe not at will, but if they're still able to do it - even only on rare occasions, this should absolutely be global news.Even Jesus had to ask God, the eternal father, for permission to use his omnipotence to raise Lazarus.
Your source is a "Paranormal Education and Research Charity". I'm not very likely to take their articles seriously.by John and Anne Spencer
There have been many reports of stigmata over the years but few have been closely studied. John and Anne Spencer were given a rare opportunity to do so, with the help of the late Mrs Heather Woods.
Over the past 770 years around 300 to 350 people have reported an extraordinary phenomenon. They have displayed, for all to see, wounds on their bodies - and particularly their hands and feet - that they believe represent the crucifixion wounds of Jesus Christ. Research shows that within religious circles there may have been many more stigmatics; many believe that their suffering is a private experience not to be made public. Certainly one recent case, Mrs Heather Woods of Lincoln, only made her marks public when she was 'told' in a message from the Lord that they could be.
Stigmata ASSAP
The fact that you're willing to believe that an entire industry of people would be so utterly evil as to hold back a cancer cure (despite the fact that many of them and their families would be affected by cancer at some point in their lives) calls into question just how cynically you view humanity.Not everyone in the pharmaceutical industry wants to see cancer cure, all the time they are making billions on chemotherapy drugs.
Firstly, do you have a source for this extract?The FDA went all out to stop this guy just to protect the pharmaceutical industries profits and their back hander.
ABOUT BURZYNSKI, THE MOVIE (PART I):
Burzynski, the Movie is an internationally award-winning documentary originally released in 2010 (with an Extended Edition released in 2011) that tells the true story of a medical doctor and Ph.D biochemist named Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski who won the largest, and possibly the most convoluted and intriguing legal battle against the Food & Drug Administration in American history.
His victorious battles with the United States government were centered around Dr. Burzynski's gene-targeted cancer medicines he discovered in the 1970's called Antineoplastons, which have currently completed Phase II FDA-supervised clinical trials in 2009 and has been given permission by the FDA to begin the final phase of FDA testing–randomized controlled clinical trials.
When Antineoplastons are approved, it will mark the first time in history a single scientist, not a pharmaceutical company, will hold the exclusive patent and distribution rights on a paradigm-shifting medical breakthrough.
Antineoplastons are responsible for curing some of the most incurable forms of terminal cancer. Various cancer survivors are presented in the film who chose these medicines instead of surgery, chemotherapy or radiation - with full disclosure of medical records to support their diagnosis and recovery - as well as systematic (non-anecdotal) FDA-supervised clinical trial data comparing Antineoplastons to other available treatments—which is published within the peer-reviewed medical literature.
One form of cancer - diffuse, intrinsic, childhood brainstem glioma has never before been cured in any scientifically controlled clinical trial in the history of medicine. Antineoplastons hold the first cures in history - dozens of them.
So why would God ever do any miracles ever? Wouldn't witnessing a miracle make faith into a fact? Isn't that the whole point of miracles? If faith is so important, then surely God shouldn't allow any miracles to be performed, ever.Because it would expose God to the world taking away the mission of all that believe in his name. Faith will merge into fact and our trial will be made impossible to conduct.
Give me one good reason why these abilities (either Gods or an individuals) have not or cannot be demonstrated under reasonable scientific conditions.
You clearly hate belief in God and no amount of logic from us will change that.
You believe in spirit/soul.
and no amount of logic from us will change that
Not true. I could be persuaded by evidence and logic.
Why? What's the difference? If a God allows (or enables) miracles to happen, they ARE compelling belief. What's the problem with doing this on a larger scale and revealing the truth to the world? Why do these events only ever "happen" on isolated occasions with little to no corroboration or evidence that such miracles occurred? Why is it whenever someone brings up an example of miracles they always talk of curing incurable diseases or mass-visitations on a vast scale, but as soon as I start asking for scientific validation of what they're claiming suddenly God get colds feet and decides not to "compel" belief? That makes no sense.Because it is the wish of such beings to SUPPORT belief not COMPEL belief.
That's completely absurd. Again, I mention the example above which have been used countless times in many debates - healing of terminal diseases and mass visitation. That is not "using discretion".Beings that are that advanced that intercede in such affairs use discretion.
No. Why should I? What does that have to do with validating the truth claims of actual miracles?Do you claim to know all the ramifications of a miracle everybody would be compelled to accept?
That is also completely absurd. You're basically saying that it's better not to have any validation of a truth claim - a truth claim that would save countless lives and improve the living conditions of millions of people - than to have any kind of validation because some people MIGHT react badly.It's effect on atheists? It's effect on believers of various schools of thought? A sudden and immediate change in philosophy? Effect on people dedicated to religious paths that don't accept miracles expect through their narrow belief system? Clearly it is not in the Will to do sudden dramatic things. In short, be careful what you ask for.
Why? What's the difference? If a God allows (or enables) miracles to happen, they ARE compelling belief. What's the problem with doing this on a larger scale and revealing the truth to the world? Why do these events only ever "happen" on isolated occasions with little to no corroboration or evidence that such miracles occurred? Why is it whenever someone brings up an example of miracles they always talk of curing incurable diseases or mass-visitations on a vast scale, but as soon as I start asking for scientific validation of what they're claiming suddenly God get colds feet and decides not to "compel" belief? That makes no sense.
Why? What's the difference? If a God allows (or enables) miracles to happen, they ARE compelling belief.
What's the problem with doing this on a larger scale and revealing the truth to the world? Why do these events only ever "happen" on isolated occasions with little to no corroboration or evidence that such miracles occurred? Why is it whenever someone brings up an example of miracles they always talk of curing incurable diseases or mass-visitations on a vast scale, but as soon as I start asking for scientific validation of what they're claiming suddenly God get colds feet and decides not to "compel" belief? That makes no sense.
That is also completely absurd. You're basically saying that it's better not to have any validation of a truth claim - a truth claim that would save countless lives and improve the living conditions of millions of people - than to have any kind of validation because some people MIGHT react badly.
So no, when it comes to claims like this being made, I will not "be careful what I ask for" when all I ask for is a reasonable demonstration of facts. When somebody makes the claim "this man used the power of God to heal a blind person" I'm absolutely going to call BS until they can demonstrate that that's what actually occurred. So far, I have received no evidence whatsoever.
So no, when it comes to claims like this being made, I will not "be careful what I ask for" when all I ask for is a reasonable demonstration of facts. When somebody makes the claim "this man used the power of God to heal a blind person" I'm absolutely going to call BS until they can demonstrate that that's what actually occurred. So far, I have received no evidence whatsoever.
Do you know that miracles are being validated all the time by science. .
For all you know I might be able to communicate with your spirit that is thousands of miles away
.
:biglaugh:
For all you know, my little yellow squeaky ducky created everything.
No they are factually not being validated in science.
Yes, they are.
I would love to see these studies that are being conducted by actual scientists (not pseudoscientific frauds), which are "validating miracles".
Care to provide sources?