• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

WHO thanks Saudi Arabia for donating $500 million in fight against coronavirus

Dawnofhope

Non-Proselytizing Baha'i
Staff member
Premium Member
‘DUBAI: The World Health Organization thanked Saudi Arabia's King Salman for donating $500 million to support the international efforts in preventing the coronavirus spread, state news agency SPA reported on Friday.’

Read more here: WHO thanks Saudi Arabia for donating $500 million in fight against coronavirus

The WHO provides invaluable work towards treatment and prevention of disease globally. The amount pledged is similar to the annual contribution of the USA that was recently withdrawn. It will be a huge relief for the many of us who support the WHO, to know they can continue the excellent work they do unhindered by the sudden loss of income from the USA.
 

stvdv

Veteran Member
‘DUBAI: The World Health Organization thanked Saudi Arabia's King Salman for donating $500 million to support the international efforts in preventing the coronavirus spread, state news agency SPA reported on Friday.’

Read more here: WHO thanks Saudi Arabia for donating $500 million in fight against coronavirus
Yesterday I was curious who is richest now
Google: Saudi king family owns ca. 2 Trillion.
(2.000.000.000.000)

And highest income:
Google: Saudi king gets 9.6 billion per year.
(9.600.000.000)

500 million trumps Trump's 400 million

King's move is interesting. Trump stalemate?
 
Last edited:

exchemist

Veteran Member
‘DUBAI: The World Health Organization thanked Saudi Arabia's King Salman for donating $500 million to support the international efforts in preventing the coronavirus spread, state news agency SPA reported on Friday.’

Read more here: WHO thanks Saudi Arabia for donating $500 million in fight against coronavirus
Thank God!

Or rather, Alhamdulillah!

So at least the WHO can carry on its work during this crisis, thanks to KSA.

.......And the USA loses just a little more of its international leadership and credibility. Good work, Donald!
 

Cooky

Veteran Member
The WHO provides invaluable work towards treatment and prevention of disease globally. The amount pledged is similar to the annual contribution of the USA that was recently withdrawn. It will be a huge relief for the many of us who support the WHO, to know they can continue the excellent work they do unhindered by the sudden loss of income from the USA.

Care to name some of their accomplishments?
 

SalixIncendium

अहं ब्रह्मास्मि
Staff member
Premium Member
I think we should match it. I mean we're only $24.4 trillion in debt. What's another $500 million?
 

exchemist

Veteran Member
Care to name some of their accomplishments?

There's this:
"A global effort to eradicate polio began in 1988, led by the World Health Organization, UNICEF, and The Rotary Foundation.[81] These efforts have reduced the number of cases diagnosed each year by 99.9 percent; from an estimated 350,000 cases in 1988 to a low of 483 cases in 2001, after which it remained at a level of about 1,000 – 2000 cases per year for a number of years.[82]"

From: Polio - Wikipedia

And this:
"In 1967, the World Health Organization intensified the global smallpox eradication by contributing $2.4 million annually to the effort, and adopted the new disease surveillance method promoted by Czech epidemiologist Karel Raška.[100]
In the early 1950s, an estimated 50 million cases of smallpox occurred in the world each year.[10] To eradicate smallpox, each outbreak had to be stopped from spreading, by isolation of cases and vaccination of everyone who lived close by. This process is known as "ring vaccination". The key to this strategy was the monitoring of cases in a community (known as surveillance) and containment. The initial problem the WHO team faced was inadequate reporting of smallpox cases, as many cases did not come to the attention of the authorities. The fact that humans are the only reservoir for smallpox infection and that carriers did not exist, played a significant role in the eradication of smallpox. The WHO established a network of consultants who assisted countries in setting up surveillance and containment activities. Early on, donations of vaccine were provided primarily by the Soviet Union and the United States, but by 1973, more than 80 percent of all vaccine was produced in developing countries.[96] The Soviet Union provided one and a half billion doses between 1958 and 1979, as well as medical staff.[101]

The last major European outbreak of smallpox was in 1972 in Yugoslavia, after a pilgrim from Kosovo returned from the Middle East, where he had contracted the virus. The epidemic infected 175 people, causing 35 deaths. Authorities declared martial law, enforced quarantine, and undertook widespread re-vaccination of the population, enlisting the help of the WHO. In two months, the outbreak was over.[102] Prior to this, there had been a smallpox outbreak in May–July 1963 in Stockholm, Sweden, brought from the Far East by a Swedish sailor; this had been dealt with by quarantine measures and vaccination of the local population.[103]

By the end of 1975, smallpox persisted only in the Horn of Africa."

From: Smallpox - Wikipedia

And there is the less obvious stuff going on the background, such as expert support to local initiatives, e.g. :

" The 6 countries of the Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS) – Cambodia, China (Yunnan Province), the Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Myanmar, Thailand and Viet Nam – continue to make significant gains in their battle to eliminate malaria by 2030. In recent years, there has been remarkable progress towards elimination of the disease. Between 2012 and 2018, the reported number of malaria cases fell by 74%; malaria deaths fell by 95% over the same period.
Collectively, GMS countries reported the steepest decline to date in Plasmodium falciparummalaria. The number of P. falciparum cases dropped by 65% in the first half of 2019 compared to the same period last year. This accelerated decrease is especially critical in view of the ongoing threat posed by drug resistance. As the lead global technical agency, WHO supports GMS countries as they work to counter multidrug resistance and eliminate malaria."
 

Cooky

Veteran Member
There's this:
"A global effort to eradicate polio began in 1988, led by the World Health Organization, UNICEF, and The Rotary Foundation.[81] These efforts have reduced the number of cases diagnosed each year by 99.9 percent; from an estimated 350,000 cases in 1988 to a low of 483 cases in 2001, after which it remained at a level of about 1,000 – 2000 cases per year for a number of years.[82]"

From: Polio - Wikipedia

And this:
"In 1967, the World Health Organization intensified the global smallpox eradication by contributing $2.4 million annually to the effort, and adopted the new disease surveillance method promoted by Czech epidemiologist Karel Raška.[100]
In the early 1950s, an estimated 50 million cases of smallpox occurred in the world each year.[10] To eradicate smallpox, each outbreak had to be stopped from spreading, by isolation of cases and vaccination of everyone who lived close by. This process is known as "ring vaccination". The key to this strategy was the monitoring of cases in a community (known as surveillance) and containment. The initial problem the WHO team faced was inadequate reporting of smallpox cases, as many cases did not come to the attention of the authorities. The fact that humans are the only reservoir for smallpox infection and that carriers did not exist, played a significant role in the eradication of smallpox. The WHO established a network of consultants who assisted countries in setting up surveillance and containment activities. Early on, donations of vaccine were provided primarily by the Soviet Union and the United States, but by 1973, more than 80 percent of all vaccine was produced in developing countries.[96] The Soviet Union provided one and a half billion doses between 1958 and 1979, as well as medical staff.[101]

The last major European outbreak of smallpox was in 1972 in Yugoslavia, after a pilgrim from Kosovo returned from the Middle East, where he had contracted the virus. The epidemic infected 175 people, causing 35 deaths. Authorities declared martial law, enforced quarantine, and undertook widespread re-vaccination of the population, enlisting the help of the WHO. In two months, the outbreak was over.[102] Prior to this, there had been a smallpox outbreak in May–July 1963 in Stockholm, Sweden, brought from the Far East by a Swedish sailor; this had been dealt with by quarantine measures and vaccination of the local population.[103]

By the end of 1975, smallpox persisted only in the Horn of Africa."

From: Smallpox - Wikipedia

And there is the less obvious stuff going on the background, such as expert support to local initiatives, e.g. :

" The 6 countries of the Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS) – Cambodia, China (Yunnan Province), the Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Myanmar, Thailand and Viet Nam – continue to make significant gains in their battle to eliminate malaria by 2030. In recent years, there has been remarkable progress towards elimination of the disease. Between 2012 and 2018, the reported number of malaria cases fell by 74%; malaria deaths fell by 95% over the same period.
Collectively, GMS countries reported the steepest decline to date in Plasmodium falciparummalaria. The number of P. falciparum cases dropped by 65% in the first half of 2019 compared to the same period last year. This accelerated decrease is especially critical in view of the ongoing threat posed by drug resistance. As the lead global technical agency, WHO supports GMS countries as they work to counter multidrug resistance and eliminate malaria."

So basically, they're a really wealthy grassroots organization, where other people do all the work for them, and they claim responsibility while playing just a minimal role.

...What the world really needs, is a true authority, with real teeth and clout. Not some grassroots organization.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Shaul

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Works for me. The U.S. taxpayer is the winner. President Trump gets to make his valid criticisms of WHO, America still gets whatever benefit we get from WHO, and some other suckers pick up the tab for the crony infested WHO for a change.

Looks like President Trump is on a roll.

Of course all the Trump haters and America haters will bleat. Because haters be hating. Anytime America gains they howl.
 

exchemist

Veteran Member
So basically, they're a really wealthy grassroots organization, where other people do all the work for them, and they claim responsibility while playing just a minimal role.

...What the world really needs, is a true authority, with real teeth and clout. Not some grassroots organization.
That's the nature of global organisations though, isn't it? Nations are sovereign, so the only way an international agency can have authority is by nations voluntarily agreeing to abide by their advice or instructions. Without that, they can have no authority. So they need support from individual nations to make them effective.

For instance, I seem to recall it was the United Sates that refused to acknowledge the authority of the International Criminal Court.

And it is the United State that refuses to make appointments to the Word Trade Organisation so that it can continue its work.

And now it is the United States that has defunded the only global organisation able to coordinate the exchange of information and control methods for the coronavirus. In the midst of a pandemic.

And who then whines about it not being effective.

Strewth!
 

Cooky

Veteran Member
That's the nature of global organisations though, isn't it? Nations are sovereign, so the only way an international agency can have authority is by nations voluntarily agreeing to abide by their advice or instructions. Without that, they can have no authority. So they need support from individual nations to make them effective.

For instance, I seem to recall it was the United Sates that refused to acknowledge the authority of the International Criminal Court.

And it is the United State that refuses to make appointments to the Word Trade Organisation so that it can continue its work.

And now it is the United States that has defunded the only global organisation able to coordinate the exchange of information and control methods for the coronavirus. In the midst of a pandemic.

And who then whines about it not being effective.

Strewth!

I guess.
 

exchemist

Veteran Member
WHO sure did a great job..... It hasn't produced a treatment nor helped prevention of the spread of COVID.
But it did repeatedly and urgently advise countries to test and trace.

Germany and Korea listened.

The USA and the UK did not.

QED.
 
Top