Political Commentator
Member
Do you think it will be Hilary Clinton, or somebody else?
Please explain your answer.
Please explain your answer.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
If Bernie maintains momentum he wins. That is a huge "if" though, and the pessimist inside me says Hillary will recover eventually and win it.Do you think it will be Hilary Clinton, or somebody else?
Please explain your answer.
^ an interesting way to pose the question.Do you think it will be Hilary Clinton, or somebody else?
The Dem process is still open and will likely be close until the nominating convention. The supers play a role but will not dominate.Hillary will be the Democrats appointed contender. The fix is in, the DNC has already determined that she is their choice. The only think stopping her is if Bernie somehow manages to take the super-delegates away from her.
Do you think it will be Hilary Clinton, or somebody else?
Please explain your answer.
TBH its really close. But its a matter of two things. 1st is time and the 2nd is under handed politics.Do you think it will be Hilary Clinton, or somebody else?
Please explain your answer.
the second issue is under handed politics. Clinton is far better than him at being a politician and throwing mud. But thankfully that has backfired on her as Bernie's issue based campaign has gained momentum and it puts Hillary in a negative light. She might regroup and attempt to do something more effective. But Bernie has a lot of ammo that he could sling at her if he so chose. There is also the looming inditement that could kill her campaign.
Sanders has lost some luster in MI over his bumbling & nasty kibitzing over the Flint water debacle.It is quite a funny thing, those commercials Hillary approves.
Bernie runs a straightforward campaign and takes pride in being completely politically transparent.
Too bad for her, ads 'attacking' (pfft) Bernie only show more people that he is the more progressive and reliable of the them.
Bernie wont play tough politics, he knows he's in the best position possible right now.
He's been consistent in politics for 30years, runs the most humanist and modern of ideas through our heads, and has overall been only issue based.
If he starts mud slinging now he'll only give her ammunition, he's doing the right thing by just being himself.
We the supporters have been the ones doing the mud slinging (and have done a damn fine job).
Sanders has lost some luster in MI over his bumbling & nasty kibitzing over the Flint water debacle.
Even Mrs Revolt (a life long Dem) regrets voting for him in the primary.
(At the risk of violating political opacity & marital bliss, I counselled that Hillary is still worse.)
This does tell me that Bernie can be a mud slinging partisan.
It's only a question of who receives the poo.
It's a politically safe game because he's attacking a Republican.Perhaps I'm not fully aware of everything he's said on this issue.
Mud slinging those /in the wrong/ isn't something that can be used against him, at least not too successfully
Maybe some type of maturity can be called into question, but I see no issue with it as of yet.
It's a politically safe game because he's attacking a Republican.
But it's also less effective in the primary.
Even Mrs Revolt (a life long Dem) regrets voting for him in the primary.
(At the risk of violating political opacity & marital bliss, I counselled that Hillary is still worse.)
There's "tough", & then there's simplistic obfuscatory demonization.Perhaps to the more sensitive voters.
The younger voters and those that only care about a candidates rationality and consistency will give little weight to this situation.
It'll appeal to those who care little for what is politically correct as well.
I myself enjoyed it because he was playing tough politics.
I imagine it's an absentee ballot thingie.People in Revoltistan get to vote early in primaries?
Tom
I say it was both, what say you?There's "tough", & then there's simplistic obfuscatory demonization.