melcollanero
Member
By introducting myself in the forum I want to start a debate probably carried on in early times on this actual forum. But giving the oportunity to new readers to try to answer can always be a good thing. As I do not have an expertise managing forum mechanics either.
What I want to know is the reason of the bad thing most of religions have move humans to do in order to accomplish the different manuscripts. As you may know, religions tend to teach humans some objectives, but as every religion has been conformed by human writers, is as humans were/are teaching others humans. To simplify, masters teaching learners, sending objectives of behavior (act) and thinking. Similar as a peasant moves his cattle.
But the point of the title is about what we, humans, have done to ourselves taking guidance of most dispersed religions. How can these, by any mean, be an example of how we have to think and, in consequence, act?. Has these, by chance, caused conciliation, unity, satisfaction.. or maybe these has ended our pain, hate, greed..?
Why do we possibly need religions after all those deaths caused by this name? Something I can conceive is that has bring to us tribal grinding, more cultural differences, causes for a group of people defy other group, to justify their immense ego, to excuse such brutal acts..
All this have done to humankind is end the vast multicultural this world once was, when in a remote past various tales of imaginations sprouted from locations to explicit his origin and the origin of things they could perceive.
I would say most religions are not a good men invention, we would have skipped deaths "from above".
If there is something in humans conept that differentiates is believing and knowing, and believe without knowing is one of the most incurrent mistakes by a vast majority, committed since long ago.
Let me know what do you think of this mess most dominant religions has bring to this world.
What I want to know is the reason of the bad thing most of religions have move humans to do in order to accomplish the different manuscripts. As you may know, religions tend to teach humans some objectives, but as every religion has been conformed by human writers, is as humans were/are teaching others humans. To simplify, masters teaching learners, sending objectives of behavior (act) and thinking. Similar as a peasant moves his cattle.
But the point of the title is about what we, humans, have done to ourselves taking guidance of most dispersed religions. How can these, by any mean, be an example of how we have to think and, in consequence, act?. Has these, by chance, caused conciliation, unity, satisfaction.. or maybe these has ended our pain, hate, greed..?
Why do we possibly need religions after all those deaths caused by this name? Something I can conceive is that has bring to us tribal grinding, more cultural differences, causes for a group of people defy other group, to justify their immense ego, to excuse such brutal acts..
All this have done to humankind is end the vast multicultural this world once was, when in a remote past various tales of imaginations sprouted from locations to explicit his origin and the origin of things they could perceive.
I would say most religions are not a good men invention, we would have skipped deaths "from above".
If there is something in humans conept that differentiates is believing and knowing, and believe without knowing is one of the most incurrent mistakes by a vast majority, committed since long ago.
Let me know what do you think of this mess most dominant religions has bring to this world.