Origins both Creation and Evolution are outside the realm of operational science.
Nope.
Neither can be observed, or recreated.
New species have been observed and documented. The most recent and most convincing is the new species of finch on Galapagos Islands.
Faith is a requirement of both systems..
Well, you have to have faith in science to trust science to find the right answers, that's true. But it's not based on one ancient book written by some anonymous author, but based on learning you can do not only through reading of many different sources, but also your own study and research.
It is academically dishonest to say that evolution is proven science.
Only to an ignorant layman. I took classes in it. It's proved. But you have to study a little first.
Evolution is lacking in a lot of ways.
For example:
In the fossil record we would expect to find thousands of transitional forms, yet we lack them.
Every fossil is a transitional form.
We have currently over 500,000 fossils. Every single one is considered both an individual specimen and also a transitional form. We all are unique.
It's a misconception to think that evolution goes in steps like on a ladder. Each individual in a species is unique, and if a group gets separated from its main group, over time the changes become larger in difference, and eventually you have a new species.
Evolution is based on assumptions like uniformitarianism and fallible radiocarbon dating methods that cannot be proved to be correct. There is no way to demonstrate that any current geological processes has always occurred at the same rate or in the same way uniformly in the past, this is something accepted by FAITH, then because of the BELIEF in evolution that REQUIRES millions of years, all evidence is interpreted through the belief of millions of years because without millions of years there is no room for evolution. the biggest evidence for evolution is the assumption that the earth is billions of years old.
You have no clue.
then you have the assumption or belief that micro evolution is somehow proof for macro evolution. again a belief.
Again, seen and documented. And by really understand genetics and how mutation and recombination works, it's not a mystery either. On top of that, computer models simulating the same algorithms produce results as well.
Then you have the mathematical problems of evolution. do yourself a favor and look into the mathematical probability of evolution. Do you have any idea how complex one single cell is? a cell is composed of so many different things that function together, that without one part, the whole cell would die, then talk about the jump from a single cell to a multi cell? and yet we are suppose to believe that a multi-celled organisms eventually evolved by natural random processes from rocks? that takes faith.Where did we get all of our complex elements? and then lets talk about the big bang.Nothing exploded into something.. let's think about the logic of that... something that doesn't exist...suddenly exists... and you call that scientific?
What's the mathematical probability of sharing an identical ERV between two species? How about 22 of them? And also 100 transposons? And other shared genetic code that's only pertaining to those two species?
Let's face it, Evolution is not scientific.
You haven't really taken your time reading and studying the actual scientists on the subject. Stop reading the apologist propaganda and take time to actually study it.
These debates are silly.
