Etritonakin
Well-Known Member
ummmmmmmmmm ........do huh?
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
why did they want to crucify jesus
- Thread starter Sabour
- Start date
outhouse
Atheistically
ummmmmmmmmm ........do huh?
Pilate's court - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Opposed to the historicity of the trial are scholars such as John Dominic Crossan and Bart Ehrman
Caiaphas and Pilate Judged the Trial of Jesus
the Jewish historian Josephus, the Hellenistic Jewish philosopher Philo of Alexandria, and the Roman historian Tacitus are even harsher in their criticism of this Roman leader. Writing in A.D. 41, Philo condemned Pilate for "briberies, insults, robberies, outrages, wanton injustices, constantly repeated executions without trial, and ceaseless and grievous cruelty."
The Roman governor of Syria, Vitellius, dismissed them both from office in A.D. 37 because of complaints about their abuse of power. Accused of excessive cruelty
Last edited:
Etritonakin
Well-Known Member
One can find scholars who oppose or support anything.
If you believe the scriptural record to be incorrect, what do you think motivated the writers to record what they did? What purpose do you think it served?
If you believe the scriptural record to be incorrect, what do you think motivated the writers to record what they did? What purpose do you think it served?
Last edited: