-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Why do humans have genes for full body hair?
- Thread starter Jose Fly
- Start date
Wildswanderer
Veteran Member
Lol ok?
Because real life experience is worthless?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
It can be. And you admitted that yours was.
Wildswanderer
Veteran Member
In your dreams. Examination of bullet holes in real flesh over 45 years trump's your internet " knowledge."
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Not if one does not examine the right bullet holes. And you admitted to that.
Wildswanderer
Veteran Member
The " right" bullet holes?
How about we add thousands of .22 sized holes in smaller animals?
Do you understand that the only real difference between the 22 mag and .223 is the powder charge?
But I'm sure you think a .22 sized projectile will cause more damage than a .243 or a 30.06.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Nope, that does not count. No wonder you are so confused. You refuse to deal with the science of the issue.
Wildswanderer
Veteran Member
I'm the only one here using any scientific logic.
I don't even know anymore what you are trying to claim.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
No, you are not. You have no understanding of the science involved. And you just confirmed that.
The problem is high powered rounds. But you do not even know what power is.
Come on back when you have some evidence for something.
There is no evidence that I didn't understand it. But more evidence of you avoiding questions. Too bad you left.
From your posts.
You may want to reflect on your posting technique, because I am not the only one that has gotten that from your posts.
Anyway, take care.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
The strawman may not have been purposeful. He truly does not appear to understand the science behind the topic.
leroy
Well-Known Member
A darwinist is someone who claims that organisms evolve mainly by the mechanism of random variation + natural selection
metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
Are you aware of the fact that Darwin was not only a Christian but also a lay minister? However, he did become more agnostic later in life, maybe caused by so many Christians who attacked him?
Wildswanderer
Veteran Member
I thought you left. I'm not going anywhere.
Wildswanderer
Veteran Member
Lol, you have no idea what you are talking about.
What qualifies as high powered? 55 grains? 100 grains, 150? 200?
Please explain why a certain charge is considered " high powered"
Why would you think that? You don't think that you are the center of attention of this thread and that losing interest in your nonsense means that a person is leaving the thread do you? That seems like a very self-important position to take.
Well, that has been obvious for some time.
It is a term coopted by creationists to use as a pejorative in an effort to dismiss the theory and supporting evidence by means of negative implication rather than by fact of evidence.
Darwinism is an archaic term and should really be applied to the study of Darwin, the man himself. Which is not the subject under debate here. His original work on the subject of evolution was not entitled the origin of species by darwinism.
I'm not sure what the proper term for a person that reviews the evidence, recognizes the explanatory power of the theory regarding that evidence and defends that position should be called. Science supporters? That sounds accurate and correct.
Did you ever figure out that this thread was about alternative creationist explanations for the science presented in that paper of the OP?
It isn't the subject of this thread now. In my experience, creationists often divert such questions and debates rather quickly into ad hominem slam fests and, for this thread, who has the bigger gun.
Last edited: