Rick O'Shez
Irishman bouncing off walls
It seems most had a long history of anti-social and/or criminal behavior.
I don't think that was the case with the London 7/7 bombers actually.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It seems most had a long history of anti-social and/or criminal behavior.
One of the victims, a police officer, was a Muslim.
Muslims should not apologize for the acts of others.
Why should the Muslim majority be presumed guilty of supporting terrorist atrocities simply because they are Muslim?
I found profiles on the 4. Only one appears to have had any religious interests. But seems to have had a bit of a hectic life. the 4 of them seem to have had past incidents that brought them to the attention of the police.I don't think that was the case with the London 7/7 bombers actually.
The problem isn't with moderate Muslims but your **** poor choice in media.
It's isn't about apologising and I don't think anyone has suggested that.
anyway, how about my condemnation , feels good ?I was talking about the OP, not in general.
I am just staying true to the OP. Condemning an act is not the same as apologizing for one
Honestly, I don’t care if Muslims condemn these acts of violence or not; I know that the vast majority of Muslims are opposed to it, at least in the U.S. I do not need to hear it from every Muslim on my social media feed to know that they do indeed abhor the murder of innocent people. Only the most irrationally xenophobic person would assume the contrary.
That said, I would like to see more moderating elements within Islam. Or I should say, reforming and liberalizing elements. I don’t think it is terribly controversial to observe that there are many more (theologically and socially) liberal Jews and Christians than Muslims. I think that it is happening organically in the US, but if the surveys in some European states are reliable, the situation there is quite dire. I don’t think that the religion itself is to blame (although I think that the Abrahamic religions are inclined towards certain things), but I do think that some of the UK survey results I’ve read (Muslims in Britain have zero tolerance of homosexuality, says poll | UK news | The Guardian) show that British Muslims are radically conservative, at least when it comes to sexuality and gender and, presumably, freedom of speech that encompasses blasphemy.
Typically there is no centralized teaching of Islam. for most Muslims their only teacher will be their mother. Sometimes what one sees is family culture
These particular teachings appear to transcend geographical and cultural limitations, but not religious ones.
Unless you take into consideration there is no centralized teaching.
No Imam, Scholar, Teacher etc is supposed to present their interpretation of scripture as being the "official" one. they are obligated to explain it is their own opinion and if they are wrong they alone are responsible. We are to question all things and ask for verification of whatever is presented as truth.
There is no "Official" teaching or interpretation of Scripture. A mulsim learns the Scripture verbatim and then learns are are different Tafsir and they should study all but believe only that which they them self have found verification for.
None of us can say something is the true interpretation we can state what we believe is and give our reasons for believing so.
Usually until we find reason to believe different we will accept what the majority of the Ulema says, but we are still obligated to do our best to find proof of all we accept.
This doesn't make (Sunni) Islam any different from Protestant Christianity, which has a history of similar theological and social conservatism. And let's be realistic: There are clear limits to theological innovation in Islam.
How much condemnation do you expect us to do. virtually every Muslims condemn the terrorist especially those who do so in the name of Islam
I have posted many links of Muslims condemning Muslim terrorists
Here are a few more recent ones
Not in our name - Muslims respond in revulsion to Charlie Hebdo massacre » Spectator Blogs
Muslims Worldwide Condemn France Attack
This next link points out extremist groups are praising the attacks, but it also points out virtually all muslims are condemning it
Charlie Hebdo killings condemned by Arab states – but hailed online by extremists | World news | The Guardian
Condemning something is different than apologizing. Apologizing signifies a level a responsibility. You misread my post and didn't read my previous post.
I didn't ask for condemnation or apology, I was just wondering why the OP had to ask the question. For my part I can apologize for things my ancestors and peoples have done. It's nothing to make a fuzz about.anyway, how about my condemnation , feels good ?