Well, the problem is that is not a favt that it is wordsalad, like the theory of gravity is based on facts.
That something is wordsalad is a first person subjective cognitivie evaluation and not a fact.
The question is if beliefs in any same are the same as facts and yes, they are in one sense. They are both words, function as a sign, have a definition and a referent.
Further they both reuire human brains, because they both referer to cogntive processes in brains. There would by no facts or beliefs without humans.
There would be an objective universe, but even that wouldn't be fact, because to judge it to be a fact, requires a human.
In effect you and I have relevant for some part of how we understand different cogntive schema. In computer terms we have different programs and to you your program is the correct one for all humans, because if your program produces a result of something being meaningless, then it is so for all programs and not just yours.
As a very simple example there are for all humans only one way to understand both 2+2=4 and 2+2=11. But that is not so, because it can be observed that there are different ways to understand that.
It is the same with words like fact, universe, culture, religion, science and so on. Your way of doing that is not the only way and when we leave natural science and enter the rest of human understanding neither you nor I are outside culture, cognintion and feelings.
But not to you, because there is only one cognition as a fact and that is yours. That is your trick. You are in effect as absurd as if you are ouside cogntion, culutre and so on for you to claim what you claim you can do when it comes to facts and word salad.
You really have to learn that there is more to the universe than facts and mere beliefs.