Why is India’s justice system “notoriously slow” at convicting an alleged terrorist?
‘A firebrand Hindu nationalist nun facing terrorism charges over the deadly bombing of a mosque has been elected to the Indian parliament, a week after Prime Minister Narendra Modi condemned her for celebrating the assassin of independence hero Mahatma Gandhi.
Sadhvi Pragya Thakur is accused of participating in the 2008 attack that killed six people and injured more than 100 others.
She spent nine years in detention over the charge and is still awaiting a trial for terrorism and criminal conspiracy after being bailed in 2017.’
Read more here: Terror accused wins Indian parliament seat
My question though is why wouldn’t India prioritise cases of terrorism? If the allegations are true it seems unjust to make the victims wait so long for the truth to come out. On the other hand if they are all fake it seems equally unjust for a potentially innocent person to be in detention for 9 years.
‘A firebrand Hindu nationalist nun facing terrorism charges over the deadly bombing of a mosque has been elected to the Indian parliament, a week after Prime Minister Narendra Modi condemned her for celebrating the assassin of independence hero Mahatma Gandhi.
Sadhvi Pragya Thakur is accused of participating in the 2008 attack that killed six people and injured more than 100 others.
She spent nine years in detention over the charge and is still awaiting a trial for terrorism and criminal conspiracy after being bailed in 2017.’
Read more here: Terror accused wins Indian parliament seat
My question though is why wouldn’t India prioritise cases of terrorism? If the allegations are true it seems unjust to make the victims wait so long for the truth to come out. On the other hand if they are all fake it seems equally unjust for a potentially innocent person to be in detention for 9 years.