Kelly of the Phoenix
Well-Known Member
Depends on how nitpicky you want to be. His tantrums stirred up the Romans and lots of people were killed in crackdowns. He didn't use the sword, but he made sure to tick off the people with them.Having derived yourself from the Christian faith you are probably aware that Jesus never causes the death of a single person. It is recorded in the New Testament, however, that he did intervene to prevent the stoning of a woman accused of adultery. He told those gathered about her, "Let him who is without sin cast the first stone." None of them were without sin and so the crowd dispersed. And to the woman he said, "Go, and sin no more."
And yet there were righteous people all over the bible.Christianity teaches that no man or woman is without sin
Except if that person needs to save the world or something?So the message is clear, it is not permissible to execute any person.
Do you have examples of Christian countries without Christian interference in government?which is why the separation of church and state is possible in a Christian land (and is next to impossible within Islam)
Wow. Never really read the bible in depth, have you?Considering its all made up by a Delusional desert Bandit and criminal gangster who molested children and had people Killed murdered Tortured and Executed
My opinion is: if you automatically assumed you're elect, you're probably not.Still needs more explanation concerning what is the 'elect.' and why you believe your 'interpretation is true and all others false.' What is your 'elect' source.
Jesus was an instigator. It's really the reason for his execution.Jesus, Buddha, Gandhi, and Martin Luther King were not statesmen like Muhammad, and did not kill a bunch of people, raise up an army for conquest, were non-violent, peaceful, meek, humble, and peacemakers. They are acceptable Religious figures in my book.
Buddha had to be convinced that women could be enlightened and even then, he wasn't 100% into it.
Ghandi was a statesman and a racist.