I don't know what a tample is, but I presume to mean temple. A temple is a large building where people of faith gather to worship together.
Ok , you are just using different definition.
It is not of importance anyway
Because we do not define 'Tample' the same , that is where our differences start.
When someone asks me , OK what does Tample mean in Christianity , i say to them you are asking the wrong question.Because it is not what it means to Christianity , it's what History tells about the crucifixition and the ressurection according to the Early Church.
Since the Early Church itself is matter of History , there are those who left enough to make conclusions about it.
In Christian belief it means that God himself is the Tample.
So the crucifixition and all the noise about the ressurection.It's pretty valid to me when Christians say that.It's part of the faith however.
We just say that is a matter of importance - to us, when others speak about our faith.
Is there another definition I'm unaware of? Regardless the temple still stood when Jesus lived, therefore if he was the messiah he came way too early.
I just want to clarify about the Tample , nothing more.
Your answer just proves that we don't talk about the same thing.
The Tanakh doesn't say the messiah will gather a group of people and invent a new religion.
Yes , but it tells something else.
I used however Jewish source for that.
You should read Isaiah 52,53.
That's Tanakh.
I don't persue to convince you in nothing religious , i am just speaking facts here.
It says he was reunite ALL the Jewish people in Israel and rebuild the temple.
You see , again the difference about the Tample.
We do not communicate on the same level.We talk about different things.
Jesus did not do this. His apostles were not Jewish, they were apostates.
But what you think about 'Them' and 'Him' is irrelevant.It's what History tells about it.
And NT is part of it,me you or anyone else not agreeing with that is irrelevant also.
A TORAH observant Jew, which he was not.
How do you know , since probably you have never read anything about it?
No he didn't. You will notice war still exists and so does injustice and paganism.
We are told to fight a spiritual war , so we again speak about two different things.
These things don't fade away , if Truly we return to Him , then every other War is just a product of Human kind.We just blame God for it.
The messiah does away with all this.
Isaiah 2:1-4
1 The word that Isaiah, son of Amoz, prophesied concerning Judah and Jerusalem.
2 And it shall be at the end of the days, that the mountain of the Lord's house shall be firmly established at the top of the mountains, and it shall be raised above the hills, and all the nations shall stream to it.
This is Jerusalem , right?
3 And many peoples shall go, and they shall say, "Come, let us go up to the Lord's mount, to the house of the God of Jacob, and let Him teach us of His ways, and we will go in His paths," for out of Zion shall the Torah come forth, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem.
4 And he shall judge between the nations and reprove many peoples, and they shall beat their swords into plowshares and their spears into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift the sword against nation, neither shall they learn war anymore.
I think that we do not communicate on the same level.
We have different understanding of Theology.
Theology is not scientific , however it bothers with religious faith and expirience.
You are literally misrepresenting Christian belief.
Apparently not given there is still war and paganism.
There will always be war, untill something changes that.
You can't change such people if they don't allow you.That's how the world still tends to function.
If it's not a personal choice , it isn't important to me.
Everything that we say and how we act on what we say is of relevance.
War is there , because of Evil.
So you fight Evil.
To be Evil is also a personal choice.
I don't give a flying fig what the bible says.
This is just the final touch of my point
You are doing the work however , i don't have to waste me time too much.
I just hope you will see there are ways to discuss things propertly.
Christianity teaches Jesus died for everyone's sins and people must accept that sacrifice to go to heaven.
Christianity teaches also that Jesus is God.
You do not have the right just to pick a teaching and misrepresent it.
G-d says in the Torah that human sacrifice is an abomination.
You need to read the whole Book of Isaiah.
Leviticus 35:33
And you shall not corrupt the land in which you live, for the blood corrupts the land, and the blood which is shed in the land cannot be atoned for except through the blood of the one who shed it.
But we need to establish first what crime is that he is guilty for.He did not came alone and said : Here i want to die.
He was accused , and he did not resisted.
Did he wanted to be killed ? I don't think so.He just predicted the way he dies , that's it.
Why do you make conclusions when you don't care anyway?
Deuteronomy 12:31
You shall not do so to the Lord, your God; for every abomination to the Lord which He hates, they did to their gods, for also their sons and their daughters they would burn in fire to their gods.
Deuteronomy 24:16
Fathers shall not be put to death because of sons, nor shall sons be put to death because of fathers; each man shall be put to death for his own transgression.
Jeremiah 7:31
And they have built the high places of Topheth which are in the valley of Ben-Hinnom, to burn their sons and daughters with fire, which I did not ordain, neither did it enter My mind.
Jesus was crucified , not burned.
You see what you are consistent on?
Messengers of G-d i.e. angels. One was specifically pointed out to be a messenger speaking for G-d. The Hebrew even describes them as such.
Are you sure that you are able to explain the narrative of Genesis 18?
We can look up the lingua , no problem.
Exodus 33:20
And He said, "You will not be able to see My face, for man shall not see Me and live."
Woow , hold on a second.
You don't go from Genesis 18 to Exodus 33 just like that.
Obviously is wasn't G-d or Abraham and Sarah would be dead upon looking at him.
It doesn't seem so to me when i read the narrative.
You
Can't
Take
Responsibility
For
Someone
Else's
Sin
Yes , but there is one who can do whatever he wants , whenever he wants.
Where's the confusion? See the verses above.
Confusion? About what ? I just asked a simple question , you relating it with confusion is something else.
Well for start read it , and then read the NT.
If ofc , you want to talk about Jesus.
Because that's what the NT is about , Jesus.
Jesus himself quotes Isaiah , but whatever , i am sick to discuss it on this level.I don't do the convincing thing.
It's called the Tanakh, the Jewish scriptures. Google it.
I read The Septuagint , the Scripture translated from Hebrew to Koine by the Jewish people at that timeline(not just any Jewish , but the finest)
These people , they understood Koine also , as in that time the lands were ruled by Alexander the Great , which means conflict of cultures and learning language is consequence of it.
I mean , what they did is the finest peace of work, when lingustic is considered.
The structure of Hebrew and Koine is not the same.But you probably don't know that either..
Some words cannot be translated however as every language is special in its way.
I accept that is the case with Hebrew also.