• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Why the NT is Historically and Theologically not acceptable for Torath Mosheh Jews

rosends

Well-Known Member
The Old Testament never says that the Messiah will be a political figure who is not God. Does the Old Testament truly predict a second advent of the Messiah? | GotQuestions.org
So what?

Jesus said in Mark 7:13, Making the word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered: and many such like things do ye. People believe interpretation that the Messiah is a political figure because they follow the Law and reject the Messiah. The interpretation that the Messiah is a political figure is not taken from what the Word of God says but from the opinions of people. Since truth and lies are mixed, there are references within the opinions of rabbis that the Messiah was to be God.
"Mark"? Never heard of him.

Next?
 

Skywalker

Well-Known Member
So what?


"Mark"? Never heard of him.

Next?

What the Pharisees and Sadducees believed was just their interpretation of the Old Testament, that doesn't mean that it was what the Old Testament said. Isaiah 53:3-5 talks about the Messiah being the Savior. He is despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief: and we hid as it were our faces from him; he was despised, and we esteemed him not. Surely he hath borne our griefs, and carried our sorrows: yet we did esteem him stricken, smitten of God, and afflicted. But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed.

Only God saves. None of us can save. Isaiah 43:11

I, even I, am the LORD; and beside me there is no saviour.
 

dybmh

ויהי מבדיל בין מים למים
Only God saves. None of us can save. Isaiah 43:11

I, even I, am the LORD; and beside me there is no saviour.
Nehemiah 9:27

"You delivered them into the power of their adversaries who oppressed them. In their time of trouble they cried to You; You in heaven heard them, and in Your abundant compassion gave them saviors who saved them from the power of their adversaries."
 

Skywalker

Well-Known Member
Nehemiah 9:27

"You delivered them into the power of their adversaries who oppressed them. In their time of trouble they cried to You; You in heaven heard them, and in Your abundant compassion gave them saviors who saved them from the power of their adversaries."

That is different from personally calling someone a Savior or saying that they ultimately were the one who saved. Only God saves.
 

Ehav4Ever

Well-Known Member
Christian lawyers go to the Bible for answers to, but that doesn't mean that little details like an adopted child getting inheritance is always addressed in the Bible.

Apples and oranges.

Christian lawyers don't a have a Christian biblically national structure that dictates how they interact with the law they are certified for. I.e. a Christian lawyer serving in America is not the same as one serving in France. I.e. inheritance law in America is one thing and inheritance law is another in France. Both are derived from different sources.

Torath Mosheh lawyers living in the land of Israel in a Torah based society has the same mandates due to the Torah having national and personal mandates directly from the Torah on how the nation and the person are to operate. Thus, in the land of Israel in Torath Mosheh communities the inheritance laws come from the same source of Torah and Halakha. Even outside of Israel, in Torath Mosheh communities have the same Torah and Halakha as the source for inheritance laws thus when a Torath Mosheh Jewish lawyer is involved in a case of inheritance involving Torath Mosheh Jews the source is the exact same for all - Torath Mosheh.

See, apples and oranges.
 

Skywalker

Well-Known Member
Apples and oranges.

Christian lawyers don't a have a Christian biblically national structure that dictates how they interact with the law they are certified for. I.e. a Christian lawyer serving in America is not the same as one serving in France. I.e. inheritance law in America is one thing and inheritance law is another in France. Both are derived from different sources.

Torath Mosheh lawyers living in the land of Israel in a Torah based society has the same mandates due to the Torah having national and personal mandates directly from the Torah on how the nation and the person are to operate. Thus, in the land of Israel in Torath Mosheh communities the inheritance laws come from the same source of Torah and Halakha. Even outside of Israel, in Torath Mosheh communities have the same Torah and Halakha as the source for inheritance laws thus when a Torath Mosheh Jewish lawyer is involved in a case of inheritance involving Torath Mosheh Jews the source is the exact same for all - Torath Mosheh.

See, apples and oranges.

The Siniatic Covenant stopped being practiced when Israel was exiled. Nobody in Israel punishes people for adultery or rebelling against their parents or practicing witchcraft or homosexuality.
 

Ehav4Ever

Well-Known Member
The Siniatic Covenant stopped being practiced when Israel was exiled. Nobody in Israel punishes people for adultery or rebelling against their parents or practicing witchcraft or homosexuality.

Greetings,

According to Christian standards a "Siniatic Covenant" may rest on punishing people for adultery or rebelling against their parents or practicing witchcraft or homosexuality.

This standard, that you mentioned, is not a Torath Mosheh standard. I.e. according to the Hebrew text of the Torah the agreement made between Hashem and Am Yisrael/Torath Mosheh Jews rests on the acceptance of the rulership of Hashem over the nation of Yisrael/Torath based Jews and the application of what is able to be performed per the sitaution.

For example, all of the Mitzvoth about how to manage the land of Israel wasn't applicable when the Israeli nation was in the midbar/wilderness before they arrived in the land of Israel. YET, the mitzvoth concerning the management of the land of Israel were given in a time when it couldn't yet be performed and thus was not applicable for that generation at that time.

Lastly, the Torath Mosheh standard is not to punish people as a first priority but instead to convince them to make corrections to their behavior, as a first priority, and only punish when they refuse and put themselves, others, and the nation in danger. That is from the Hebrew text of the Torah. ;)

See how the OP got it right. Different standards for Christians than the standards of Torath Mosheh and Orthodox Jews.
 

Skywalker

Well-Known Member
Greetings,

According to Christian standards a "Siniatic Covenant" may rest on punishing people for adultery or rebelling against their parents or practicing witchcraft or homosexuality.

This standard, that you mentioned, is not a Torath Mosheh standard. I.e. according to the Hebrew text of the Torah the agreement made between Hashem and Am Yisrael/Torath Mosheh Jews rests on the acceptance of the rulership of Hashem over the nation of Yisrael/Torath based Jews and the application of what is able to be performed per the sitaution.

For example, all of the Mitzvoth about how to manage the land of Israel wasn't applicable when the Israeli nation was in the midbar/wilderness before they arrived in the land of Israel. YET, the mitzvoth concerning the management of the land of Israel were given in a time when it couldn't yet be performed and thus was not applicable for that generation at that time.

Lastly, the Torath Mosheh standard is not to punish people as a first priority but instead to convince them to make corrections to their behavior, as a first priority, and only punish when they refuse and put themselves, others, and the nation in danger. That is from the Hebrew text of the Torah. ;)

See how the OP got it right. Different standards for Christians than the standards of Torath Mosheh and Orthodox Jews.

I believe that the beliefs that influence the idea that the New Testament is not acceptable for Torath Mosheh Jews comes from the opinions of people. What Are the Differences Between Judaism and Christianity?

The Old Testament is the Word of God, and to say otherwise would be arbitrary opinions of man compared to the absolute of God’s Word. Christians applaud those in Judaism who hold to the Old Testament as the truth. But at the same time, Judaists deny that the New Testament is the Word of God, based on their own arbitrary opinions.

Furthermore, adding oral traditions to the Word of God is also arbitrary. Naturally, these oral traditions are attributed to Moses by the Jews. But after 1,500 years of oral transmission in the hands of fallible and sinful men who were often in disobedience to the written Word, how can anyone know for sure that they are accurate? In the Old Testament, there were times when most Israelites knew precious little about the writtenWord due to so much false worship, let alone the oral traditions.

Borrowing from the Word of Christ
Obviously, those in Judaism have regarded much of the Bible as the truth, especially the Old Testament. Since Jesus, Immanuel, is God with us (Isaiah 7:14; Matthew 1:23), the Old Testament is His Word. Therefore, Judaists borrow from Jesus’ Word for their religion. This helps clarify a misconception. Often, we hear that Christianity was born out of Judaism, but this is not the case. Judaism was properly born as a response to Christianity.
 

rosends

Well-Known Member
What the Pharisees and Sadducees believed was just their interpretation of the Old Testament, that doesn't mean that it was what the Old Testament said. Isaiah 53:3-5 talks about the Messiah being the Savior. He is despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief: and we hid as it were our faces from him; he was despised, and we esteemed him not. Surely he hath borne our griefs, and carried our sorrows: yet we did esteem him stricken, smitten of God, and afflicted. But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed.

Only God saves. None of us can save. Isaiah 43:11

I, even I, am the LORD; and beside me there is no saviour.
No it wasn't.
No it doesn't.
Next?
 

Ehav4Ever

Well-Known Member
I believe that the beliefs that influence the idea that the New Testament is not acceptable for Torath Mosheh Jews comes from the opinions of people.

As you yourself state "you beleive." Thus, your beleif is based on Christian standards. It is not like you read the Tanakh in Hebrew and came to that conclusion. ;)
 

Skywalker

Well-Known Member
As you yourself state "you beleive." Thus, your beleif is based on Christian standards. It is not like you read the Tanakh in Hebrew and came to that conclusion. ;)

There is historical evidence that supports the New Testament. Did Jesus really exist? Is there any historical evidence of Jesus Christ? | GotQuestions.org

Question: "Did Jesus really exist? Is there any historical evidence of Jesus Christ?"

Answer:
Typically, when this question is asked, the person asking qualifies the question with “outside of the Bible.” We do not grant this idea that the Bible cannot be considered a source of evidence for the existence of Jesus. The New Testament contains hundreds of references to Jesus Christ. There are those who date the writing of the Gospels to the second century A.D., more than 100 years after Jesus’ death. Even if this were the case (which we strongly dispute), in terms of ancient evidences, writings less than 200 years after events took place are considered very reliable evidences. Further, the vast majority of scholars (Christian and non-Christian) will grant that the Epistles of Paul (at least some of them) were in fact written by Paul in the middle of the first century A.D., less than 40 years after Jesus’ death. In terms of ancient manuscript evidence, this is extraordinarily strong proof of the existence of a man named Jesus in Israel in the early first century A.D.

It is also important to recognize that in A.D. 70, the Romans invaded and destroyed Jerusalem and most of Israel, slaughtering its inhabitants. Entire cities were literally burned to the ground. We should not be surprised, then, if much evidence of Jesus’ existence was destroyed. Many of the eyewitnesses of Jesus would have been killed. These facts likely limited the amount of surviving eyewitness testimony of Jesus.
 

Skywalker

Well-Known Member
No it wasn't.
No it doesn't.
Next?

Even rabbis within Judaism believed that the Suffering Servant was the Messiah. The Suffering Servant of Isaiah – A Rabbinic Anthology | Jewish Awareness Ministries

The Suffering Servant in Rabbinic Controversy

Judaism solidly taught that the Suffering Servant was the Messiah until a very influential Talmudic commentator Rabbi Shlomo Itzchaki, 1040-1105 CE (called Rashi) and some of the later rabbis began to interpret the passage as referring to Israel. In Rashi’s own words this was a defensive move to take away the case made by Christians that the Suffering Servant was fulfilled in Jesus.

Rashi lived at a time when Christianity encouraged the persecution of Jewish people. Although he could do little to stop the murder and forced conversion under penalty of death, he and others wanted to safeguard the Jewish people from theological attack.

Rabbi Joseph ben Kaspi (1280-1340 CE), like Rashi, wanted to change the accepted interpretation of Isaiah 53 to combat the Christian witness. He warned the rabbis that “those who expounded this section of the Messiah give occasion to the heretics (Christians) to interpret it of Jesus.” In response to this Rabbi Saadia ibn Danan in the 1500s observed: “May God forgive him for not having spoken the truth.”[8]

Although Rashi and others had sincere intentions, they were wrong. Important Jewish rabbis and leaders realized the inconsistencies of Rashi’s interpretation. They presented a threefold argument: first, the agreement of the older commentators; second, that the text is in the singular; and third, they cited verse eight. This verse presents an impossible situation to those who interpreted this passage as Israel.
 

Harel13

Am Yisrael Chai
Staff member
Premium Member

Ehav4Ever

Well-Known Member
There is historical evidence that supports the New Testament.

Maybe as far Christians are concerned but not for Torath Mosheh Jews. Besides, if did you would have answered the historical questions I presented in previous threads a long time ago. ;)
 

Clear

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Hi @Harel13

1) REGARDING THE JEWISH CLAIM THAT IT IS A "CHRISTIAN VIEW" THAT "THE RABBINIC MOVEMENT CAME OUT OF NOWHERE".


Harel13 said : “Your claim that "the Rabbinic Movement" came out of nowhere is a Christian view. “ (post #548)
Clear responded : "You are misquoting me. I did not say that the Rabbinic Movement came out of “nowhere”.
Like most movements, Judaism had schisms.
The latter rabbinic movement is simply a schism of earlier Judaism.
After the destruction of the Jerusalem temple it became more Dominant, perhaps.
But a schism nonetheless." (post #554)

Harel 13 responded : "I exaggerated a bit for effect." (post #555)

Clear responded : " There is a difference between an "exaggeration" and a "deception". I never claimed the modern Jewish Rabbinic Movement "came out of nowhere".
Your claim that this is a "Christian view" is also a deceptive statement. This is not how Christianity typically views Rabbinic Judaism. (post #556)

Harel13 responded : "Really. Quite a great number of Christians I've spoken with online hold some version or other of this view. I guess online Christians are all fringe. Who knew." (post #557)
Clear responded : ""Quite a great number" you've spoken with? No "exaggeration"?
If there have been "quite a great number" of Christians you have spoke with that believe "the Rabbinic Movement came out of nowhere", then will you give us merely 5 quotes that show Christians actually believe that "the Rabbinic Movement came out of 'nowhere'"? (post #561)


Harel13, You forgot to respond to your claim that it is a "Christian view" that "the Rabbinic movement came out of nowhere".

Can you give us just 5 quotes from the "quite a great number" of Christians you claim to have spoken with believed "the Rabbinic movement came out of nowhere"?




2) REGARDING THE CHRISTIAN CLAIM THAT THE RABBINIC MOVEMENT ABANDONED SOME OF THE EARLY TEXTUAL TRADITIONS THAT THE ANCIENT CHRISTIANS RETAINED

Clear claimed “
The Rabbinic movement abandoned some of their early textual traditions while many of the earliest Christians retained them.” (post #505)

Harel13 said : “Evidence?” (post #548)
Clear asked : "Harel13, describe what your Judaism teaches about what God was doing before he began to create this earth and lets look at those traditions first." (post # 554)
Harel13 responded : "One midrash says that God created several hundred worlds and destroyed them. What'd your god do, create a "word"?" (post #555)
Clear responded : "The ancient Christian God was Jehovah of the Old Testament. And so, yes, before he created this world, he had other creations such as the several hundred words you referred to. I think this is a good start in examining Rabbinic Traditions and which ones they have and which they abandoned.
What else was God doing before creation besides creating other worlds in the traditions of the Orthodox Rabbinic Jewish movement? (post #556)

Harel13 responded : "Nothing comes to mind at the moment." (post #557)

Clear asked : "So, you are saying that the only tradition that the rabbinic movement retained regarding what God was doing before creating this earth was that he was creating and then destroying other worlds?
No other traditions regarding this time period?
Do you want to do a bit of research and confirm this point that this is the only Rabbinic tradition that was retained concerning this time period before we proceed or are you comfortable with this description of only a single Rabbinic tradition concerning this time period?" (post #559)

Harel13 said : "No. I said that nothing comes to mind at the moment. I didn't realize I was talking to Clear, the human supercomputer who remembers every single source in the Christian compendium by heart." (post #560)

Harel13, "Exaggeration" and Sarcasm and ad hominems will not make this discussion more efficient nor more pleasant.
The world is not ending and you are not being attacked.
Be at peace. I simply asked you to try to confirm that this single tradition is the only tradition the Rabbinic Movement has regarding the pre-creation time period.
My claim is that there are early traditions which the rabbinic movement abandoned which early Judaism had.
I implied that the loss/abandonment of some of these traditions left the rabbinic movement with less religious insights.
I was simply trying to confirm your reply that the tradition that "God created several hundred worlds and destroyed them" was the single and only tradition concerning this time period that rabbinic Judaism retained.



3) REGARDING THE ORDER, FIRST A RABBINIC JEW CONFIRMS THE LACK OF TRADITIONS IN THE RABBINIC MOVEMENT AND SECONDLY WE COMPARE THIS LACK TO EARLIER TRADITIONS

Harel13 asked : "Where are you going with this? "
I am simply having you confirm to readers what traditions you admit you do not have.
If you confirm what traditions Rabbinic Judiam has (or lacks), it is easier to demonstrate traditions which the Rabbinic movement abandoned or no longer has.
It is also easier to demonstrate the value of such traditions and the effect the loss of traditions would have on the Rabbinic movement compared to other Jewish movements that retained such traditions.
Be patient, we will get to Jewish traditions the Rabbinic movement lacks.

For example,
Does the Rabbinic Movement have any traditions regarding Satan/Lucifer/Devil and what he was doing before the world was created?
Does the Rabbinic Movement have any traditions regarding the motives and process by which Satan/Lucifer/the Devil became ill-disposed toward Adam or God or others?
Does the Rabbinic Movement have any traditions regarding what the Messiah was doing before the world was created?
Does the Rabbinic Movement have any traditions regarding Adams spirit and it's condition before being placed into the Garden of Eden?
Does the Rabbinic Movement have any traditions regarding Gods motives in both planning and executing his plan to create an earth and populate it with mankind.
Does the Rabbinic Movement have any traditions regarding the nature of the place where God resides before the creation of the earth?
Does the Rabbinic Movement have any traditions regarding the nature of spirits within mankind before the creation of the earth?


Where I am going is simply to have you confirm what traditions the rabbinic movement has and then I will compare that to early Jewish traditions the movement lacks and to compare the two sets of data and discuss the importance such traditions had (have) to religions that retained these early Jewish traditions and the effect of the abandonment or loss of traditions.


Clear
ακακακσεω
 
Last edited:

Harel13

Am Yisrael Chai
Staff member
Premium Member
Harel13, You forgot to respond to your claim that it is a "Christian view" that "the Rabbinic movement came out of nowhere".

Can you give us just 5 quotes from the "quite a great number" of Christians you claim to have spoken with believed "the Rabbinic movement came out of nowhere"?
I did respond. See here.
The world is not ending and you are not being attacked.
Be at peace.
You make an assumption that I'm yelling at the screen and typing in anger. I'm not.
I simply asked you to try to confirm that this single tradition is the only tradition the Rabbinic Movement has regarding the pre-creation time period.
I did not confirm this nor did I imply it.
I was reminded earlier by another poster of the midrash that says that Hashem wrote the Torah prior to the creation, so that's another tradition. Once again, the fact that at this point I have brought two traditions does not mean in any way that these are the only two traditions.
Does the Rabbinic Movement have any traditions regarding Satan/Lucifer/Devil and what he was doing before the world was created?
Yes. He didn't exist. He's an angel created along with the other angels on the second day of creation.
Does the Rabbinic Movement have any traditions regarding the motives and process by which Satan/Lucifer/the Devil became ill-disposed toward Adam or God or others?
No. Angels do what God tells them to do.
Does the Rabbinic Movement have any traditions regarding what the Messiah was doing before the world was created?
The concept of the Mashiach existed before the creation. Not the Mashiach himself. Repentance is another concept that existed before the creation.
Does the Rabbinic Movement have any traditions regarding Adams spirit and it's condition before being placed into the Garden of Eden?
No tradition that differentiates between Adam prior to being put in the Garden and after being put in the Garden but before the sin comes to mind. This does not mean that there aren't any.
Does the Rabbinic Movement have any traditions regarding Gods motives in both planning and executing his plan to create an earth and populate it with mankind.
Yes.
Does the Rabbinic Movement have any traditions regarding the nature of the place where God resides before the creation of the earth?
Yes.
Does the Rabbinic Movement have any traditions regarding the nature of spirits within mankind before the creation of the earth?
What's the difference between those spirits prior to creation and after creation?
 

Clear

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
POST ONE OF TWO

Hi @Harel13

1) REGARDING THE JEWISH CLAIM THAT IT IS A "CHRISTIAN VIEW" THAT "THE RABBINIC MOVEMENT CAME OUT OF NOWHERE".


Harel13 said : “Your claim that "the Rabbinic Movement" came out of nowhere is a Christian view. “ (post #548)
Clear responded : "You are misquoting me. I did not say that the Rabbinic Movement came out of “nowhere”.
Like most movements, Judaism had schisms.
The latter rabbinic movement is simply a schism of earlier Judaism.
After the destruction of the Jerusalem temple it became more Dominant, perhaps.
But a schism nonetheless." (post #554)

Harel 13 responded : "I exaggerated a bit for effect." (post #555)

Clear responded : " There is a difference between an "exaggeration" and a "deception". I never claimed the modern Jewish Rabbinic Movement "came out of nowhere".
Your claim that this is a "Christian view" is also a deceptive statement. This is not how Christianity typically views Rabbinic Judaism. (post #556)

Harel13 responded : "Really. Quite a great number of Christians I've spoken with online hold some version or other of this view. I guess online Christians are all fringe. Who knew." (post #557)
Clear responded : ""Quite a great number" you've spoken with? No "exaggeration"?
If there have been "quite a great number" of Christians you have spoke with that believe "the Rabbinic Movement came out of nowhere", then will you give us merely 5 quotes that show Christians actually believe that "the Rabbinic Movement came out of 'nowhere'"? (post #561)


Since you cannot "quote" other users on the forum, perhaps you could give us 5 quotes from a google search that shows it is a "Christian view" that "the rabbinic movement came out of nowhere".

Can you do this so that you can support your claim that this is a "Christian view" of the rabbinic movement? I am Christian and do not believe this nor have I ever heard of this but you say it is a Christian view and you've heard it "quite a great number of times". One of us is incorrect.



2) REGARDING THE CHRISTIAN CLAIM THAT THE RABBINIC MOVEMENT ABANDONED SOME OF THE EARLY TEXTUAL TRADITIONS THAT THE ANCIENT CHRISTIANS RETAINED

Clear claimed “
The Rabbinic movement abandoned some of their early textual traditions while many of the earliest Christians retained them.” (post #505)

Harel13 said : “Evidence?” (post #548)
Clear asked : "Harel13, describe what your Judaism teaches about what God was doing before he began to create this earth and lets look at those traditions first." (post # 554)
Harel13 responded : "One midrash says that God created several hundred worlds and destroyed them. What'd your god do, create a "word"?" (post #555)
Clear responded : "The ancient Christian God was Jehovah of the Old Testament. And so, yes, before he created this world, he had other creations such as the several hundred words you referred to. I think this is a good start in examining Rabbinic Traditions and which ones they have and which they abandoned.
What else was God doing before creation besides creating other worlds in the traditions of the Orthodox Rabbinic Jewish movement? (post #556)

Harel13 responded : "Nothing comes to mind at the moment." (post #557)

Clear asked : "So, you are saying that the only tradition that the rabbinic movement retained regarding what God was doing before creating this earth was that he was creating and then destroying other worlds?
No other traditions regarding this time period?
Do you want to do a bit of research and confirm this point that this is the only Rabbinic tradition that was retained concerning this time period before we proceed or are you comfortable with this description of only a single Rabbinic tradition concerning this time period?" (post #559)

Harel13 said : "No. I said that nothing comes to mind at the moment. I didn't realize I was talking to Clear, the human supercomputer who remembers every single source in the Christian compendium by heart." (post #560)
Clear said : "Harel13, "Exaggeration" and Sarcasm and ad hominems will not make this discussion more efficient nor more pleasant.
The world is not ending and you are not being attacked.
Be at peace. I simply asked you to try to confirm that this single tradition is the only tradition the Rabbinic Movement has regarding the pre-creation time period.
My claim is that there are early traditions which the rabbinic movement abandoned which early Judaism had.
I implied that the loss/abandonment of some of these traditions left the rabbinic movement with less religious insights.
I was simply trying to confirm your reply that the tradition that "God created several hundred worlds and destroyed them" was the single and only tradition concerning this time period that rabbinic Judaism retained. (post #596)




Harel13 said : “Harel13 said : "No. I said that nothing comes to mind at the moment. I didn't realize I was talking to Clear, the human supercomputer who remembers every single source in the Christian compendium by heart." (post #560)
Clear responded : “Harel13, "Exaggeration" and Sarcasm and ad hominems will not make this discussion more efficient nor more pleasant.
The world is not ending and you are not being attacked.
Be at peace. I simply asked you to try to confirm that this single tradition is the only tradition the Rabbinic Movement has regarding the pre-creation time period. (post #596)

harel13 responded : “You make an assumption that I'm yelling at the screen and typing in anger. I'm not.” (post #597)


This last claim of yours is also incorrect. Of course I am not making that assumption.
I simply think “exaggeration” and Sarcasm and ad hominems will not be helpful to our discussion.


.POST TWO OF TWO FOLLOWS
 
Last edited:

Clear

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
POST TWO OF TWO



3) REGARDING THE ORDER, FIRST A RABBINIC JEW CONFIRMS THE LACK OF TRADITIONS IN THE RABBINIC MOVEMENT AND SECONDLY WE COMPARE THIS LACK TO EARLIER TRADITIONS

Harel13 asked : "Where are you going with this? "
I am simply having you confirm to readers what traditions you admit you do not have.
If you confirm what traditions Rabbinic Judiam has (or lacks), it is easier to demonstrate traditions which the Rabbinic movement abandoned or no longer has.
It is also easier to demonstrate the value of such traditions and the effect the loss of traditions would have on the Rabbinic movement compared to other Jewish movements that retained such traditions.
Be patient, we will get to Jewish traditions the Rabbinic movement lacks.

Harel12 pointed out : "I was reminded earlier by another poster of the midrash that says that Hashem wrote the Torah prior to the creation, so that's another tradition"
Good. We now have two traditions that we know of that the Rabbinic movement has regarding the time period before creation of the earth.


For example,
Clear asked : "Does the Rabbinic Movement have any traditions regarding Satan/Lucifer/Devil and what he was doing before the world was created?
Harel13 responded :Yes. He didn't exist. He's an angel created along with the other angels on the second day of creation. (post #597)
OK, so the rabbinic movement does not have a single tradition regarding Satan BEFORE creation nor does it have any tradition regarding other angels BEFORE creation.
But instead, the Rabbinic movement has a tradition that God created Satan on the second day of Creation AND that was when the other angels were created.


Clear asked : "Does the Rabbinic Movement have any traditions regarding the motives and process by which Satan/Lucifer/the Devil became ill-disposed toward Adam or God or others?
Harel13 responded : "No. Angels do what God tells them to do."
OK, so the rabbinic movement does not have a single tradition regarding Satan's motives or a process by which the Devil became ill-disposed torward Adam or God or others based on his own characteristics, but instead, Satan does just as other angels, "what God tells them to do".


Clear asked : "Does the Rabbinic Movement have any traditions regarding what the Messiah was doing before the world was created?"
Harel13 responded : "The concept of the Mashiach existed before the creation. Not the Mashiach himself. Repentance is another concept that existed before the creation.
OK, good. So the rabbinic movement does have a tradition regarding the concept of a Messiah but the Rabbinic movement does NOT have a tradition regarding the existence of the Messiah nor of the Messiahs actions before the creation of the earth. And, the Rabbinic movement does have a tradition that repentance was going to be part of mortal conditions prior to the creation of the earth.


Clear asked : Does "the Rabbinic Movement have any traditions regarding Adams spirit and it's condition before being placed into the Garden of Eden?
Harel13 responded : "No tradition that differentiates between Adam prior to being put in the Garden and after being put in the Garden but before the sin comes to mind. This does not mean that there aren't any."
OK, good. So I can assume that there are no traditions in rabbinic Judaism regarding interactions between Satan and Adam before they met in the Garden. Is this correct?


Clear asked : "Does the Rabbinic Movement have any traditions regarding Gods motives in both planning and executing his plan to create an earth and populate it with mankind?
Harel13 responded : "Yes"
OK, good. Can you describe these traditions that the Rabbinic movement has?. What was Gods original motive in executing his plan to create this earth and to populate it with mankind inside the Rabbinic movement? If you have a reference that would be helpful.


Clear asked : "Does the Rabbinic Movement have any traditions regarding the nature of the place where God resides before the creation of the earth?
Harel13 said "Yes"
OK, very good. Can you describe these traditions that the Rabbinic movement has?. Can you describe the nature of the place where God resided before the creation of the earth?
Again, if you have a reference that would be helpful.


Clear asked : "Does the Rabbinic Movement have any traditions regarding the nature of spirits within mankind before the creation of the earth?
Harel asked for clarification : "What's the difference between those spirits prior to creation and after creation?

In the most basic sense, a spirit prior to creation has no body and a spirit that enters mortality that was created is born into a body.
Does the Rabbinic movement have any tradition regarding the existence of spirits of mankind existing prior to the physical creation and if so, can you describe anything about their characteristics and conditions?

Where I am going is simply to have you confirm what traditions the rabbinic movement has and then I will compare that to early Jewish traditions the movement lacks and to compare the two sets of data and discuss the importance such traditions had (have) to religions that retained these early Jewish traditions and the effect of the abandonment or loss of traditions.

I understand my questions are bothersome, but if you are an adherent to the Rabbinic Movement, then you are able to confirm the presence or lack of specific sets of traditions within the Rabbinic movement. I understand this sort of questioning may be bothersome and so I will stop asking about other areas of traditions and merely clarify the ones we've already identified. Thank you for your patience. Please correct any incorrect assumptions regarding my wording of your responses regarding your traditions so that the comparisons are more accurate.


Clear
ακνεειτζω
 
Last edited:
Top