• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Why vegetarianism?

1213

Well-Known Member

Thank you. Very nicely produced pages. I don't believe many things they claim. But, the biggest problem in all that is this claim:

"Carbon dioxide is Earth’s most important greenhouse gas: a gas that absorbs and radiates heat. Unlike oxygen or nitrogen"

Can you explain why it is so? I didn't notice it explained in those pages and I think that is the crucial issue. What is the mechanism, how is it possible that the carbon is the problem, but not for example oxygen, which is heavier element than carbon?
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
I don't believe many things they claim.
And why is it that you don't believe? Have you studied climate change scientifically? What is your opinion based on?

But, the biggest problem in all that is this claim:

"Carbon dioxide is Earth’s most important greenhouse gas: a gas that absorbs and radiates heat. Unlike oxygen or nitrogen"
That's not a problem since not all gases have the same effect. Higher CO2 levels creates like a blanket effect, namely allowing the sun's rays in but slowing the escape of heat at night.
 

Wildswanderer

Veteran Member
Hmmmm that sounds well-informed.
Fruit. Vegetables. Pulses. Please state what harm these cause.
Seriously? Have you ever farmed or had a garden? Do you understand that most all vegetables are grown using dead animals or animal matter, or else harmful synthetics?
That includes organic.
 

ImmortalFlame

Woke gremlin
Kinda missed the point. You can get grass fed beef. Look into it.
Grass-fed cattle do not eat 100% grass, and even then the grass they eat is still specifically grown and cultivated for them. It's still land, and still uses resources to grow and cultivate.

So no, I did not miss the point. You missed mine, repeatedly.
 

1213

Well-Known Member
...
That's not a problem since not all gases have the same effect. Higher CO2 levels creates like a blanket effect, namely allowing the sun's rays in but slowing the escape of heat at night.

But, the question is, what in C is that makes it do that?

Also, it would be nice to know, why sulfur dioxide allegedly causes cooling and somehow carbon dioxide warming? I don't think there is any logical reason to believe so. But, I appreciate, if you can give some good scientific explanation what is the difference between those two.

But volcanic gases like sulfur dioxide can cause global cooling, while volcanic carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas, has the potential to promote global warming.
Volcanoes Can Affect Climate | U.S. Geological Survey (usgs.gov)
 

1213

Well-Known Member
You don't believe the factual information produced by the likes of NASA and the UN, but you do believe a lot of unfounded nonsense.

Why do you believe they are factual, because of fancy name, or because they support your world view?
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
But, the question is, what in C is that makes it do that?
I'm not a climate scientist but I do know from those that are that this is indeed the #1 cause of the recent global warming, especially since this effect has been known since the late 1800's.

Also, it would be nice to know, why sulfur dioxide allegedly causes cooling and somehow carbon dioxide warming?
My understanding is that it's not the chemical makeup of sulfur dioxide but is the volcanic clouds that throw the sun's radiation back into space before reaching ground. "Nuclear winter" hypothetically could have a similar effect according to a research team headed by Carl Sagan, much to their surprise: Nuclear winter - Wikipedia
 

Wildswanderer

Veteran Member
And this is your defence of the meat industry?
This is an explanation of what works and works well, that is, the old way of combining farming animals and plants. The Amish still do it and so do some others. The animal matter supports the soil for the plants, and the vegetables and such are able to be grown without synthetic fertilizers. It's almost as if someone designed it to work that way. Alas, there is more labor involved, but more rewards when the soil is maintained by animal and crop rotation.
You seem to be under the impression that I should feel some kind of guilt for eating animals? Not the ones I raised and butcher.
If you have trouble with the meat industry, seek out independent farmers to buy from or raise your own meat.
 

Wildswanderer

Veteran Member
Grass-fed cattle do not eat 100% grass, and even then the grass they eat is still specifically grown and cultivated for them. It's still land, and still uses resources to grow and cultivate.

So no, I did not miss the point. You missed mine, repeatedly.
So does plants for humans and no, you don't always have to cultivate grassland.
And it's so much better than the wasteland left by a bean field.
 

Secret Chief

Veteran Member
You seem to be under the impression that I should feel some kind of guilt for eating animals? Not the ones I raised and butcher.
If you have trouble with the meat industry, seek out independent farmers to buy from or raise your own meat.

I don't expect you to feel anything. I stopped eating meat 40 years ago as it is not necessary and I could not be a part of something that I consider is cruel, abusive, disgusting, abhorrent and horrific. You can therefore perhaps imagine I will not be taking up your suggestion.
 

Wildswanderer

Veteran Member
I don't expect you to feel anything. I stopped eating meat 40 years ago as it is not necessary and I could not be a part of something that I consider is cruel, abusive, disgusting, abhorrent and horrific. You can therefore perhaps imagine I will not be taking up your suggestion.
Really, one could make the argument that merely living on the planet requires one to be cruel, because no matter what, you are killing other beings. But of course that's the way nature works.
 

Secret Chief

Veteran Member
Really, one could make the argument that merely living on the planet requires one to be cruel, because no matter what, you are killing other beings. But of course that's the way nature works.
One could but I don't. I consider cruelty to be a human construct. A carnivore killing a being is not being cruel. Yes, by living all beings kill, even if only unintentionally. But that in itself is not "cruelty." If I walk across a field and in so doing kill insects under my feet, that is not cruelty. Cruelty is endemic in the meat industry.
 
Top