This is an emotional issue, made that way to hopefully lead to self censorship of free and objective thinking. One is not allowed to say what an objective person thinks, since they are too afraid to hurt feelings and thereby have to experience a social tempter tantrum.
It reminds me of a marriage between a mellow husband learning to adjust to an emotionally wild but fun loving wife. She can be fun but also mean and dead wrong. The husband learns that the easiest path of happiness is to let her win arguments to avoid her temper tantrums. He learns; yes dear, but keeps things quietly clear. When she is happy she can be a god send. But facts and truth are not her guide.
The left has been using this married male and female dynamic schema for political purposes, to silence common sense, in exchange for less threat of emotional crap and revenge. The Left has limited common sense and very little in the way of practical skills. What is left is gaming and emotional black male. Like the beat down husband who is wrong when he is right, people will learn to accept the lessor of two evils and go along with bad self serving ideas.
If you look at the modern world, not all cultures are the same in terms of its cultural details, applications and its practical results. For any criteria there are cultures that do better in various things. Under the emotional gaming strategy, we are not supposed to say this, since each comparison might hurt someone's feelings. It is never about learning from the mistakes, since the mere mention of mistakes can hurt feelings.
We cannot teach, those people who cultures, who are not as equipped, how to rise above. Instead we need to be so concerned about hurting feelings, today, that we leave them at that disadvantage and give them lip service service, such as saying we are all equal. Here are freebies for staying equal.
This approach is very sinister, since you cannot solve objective problems with subjective emotional blackmail that is hypocritical. This strategy appear to be designed as way to control people and make them dependent. You can give a man fish to eat or teach them to fish so they can be independent, with teaching taboo by the Left, based on emotional blackmail and hurt feelings.
If you are a white male, by Leftist definition, you are a racist, period, unless you are a Lefty. How dumb and hypocritical is that? What we are being taught is to obey nonsense to avoid a tempter tantrum, even though the exact same behavior can be done by any other demographics, including Leftist white males, and somehow only this is different. Maybe someone can give us an object reason, unattached to self serving emotions, why this is so?
The purpose of this scam is to create division and make a scapegoat. The singled out scapegoat becomes the source of all the problems. The Nazi did this to the Jews. The Nazi were the problem but the scapegoat allows the problem to be emotionally transferred to someone else. It is mean spirited and comes from the hearts of darkness; Democrat party. The real solution is to teach people to fish in better spots, so they can rise above and become more independent. Pointing out a disadvantage and how to solve it, is good.
The white male is no different than any person since we are all equal. So why single them out as the target and scapegoat for emotional blackmail? How does this help the lessor cultures rise above? Digging a hole for the tall guy to stand in, can create the illusion that others are rising above, but with no real change. The hole is there to make the tall guy appear shorter, with emotional thinking allowing a relative reference scam.
If you look at history, say the Civil War, it was the Democrat party; southern Democrats, who wished to form a second country that would maintain slavery. I can not understands why the Democrat party was not dissolved after the Civil War, for their evil intent to continue slavery. That decision has had an impact on the present.
Picture if the Nazi party was fully maintained after WWII and not dissolved. Those in power, who vowed the south would rise again, would have still have an influence on all future laws that would reflect their unfulfilled desire for a two race state. Germany, via the allies, knew this wood happen so it was dissolved.
It was not hard for the southern Democrats to get systemic racism into law, since most bills in Congress have lots of pork barrel added during negotiations. These pet bill add-ons are designed to help elected leaders with their reelection. Some will trade money for legal power; bridges for dual justice. Bad and racists law got onto bills that were given names that made them appear innocent; human dignity bill. It is not coincidence that the last places where civil rights had to be fought were controlled by the Democrats who legally carved out a second culture for themselves.
I have no clue why the blacks attached their wagon to the white males of the Democrats Party, who by their own definition, cannot be called racists, no matter what they do or say. Fifty years later, blacks are still struggling. What did they expect when emotional appeal leads common sense?
What I think should happen is the Democratic Party needs to be finally dissolved to break its racist and emotional gaming roots. The rank and file can rename it, and start a new day with less darkness.
