"Wives who aren’t subservient to husbands are preaching ‘false gospel, . . .’

[Straw Dog]

My experience is different, women are just as good as leading.

Yeah, I suspect that many women just haven't been given the chance to be leaders.

As far as managers are concerned, I have been more satisfied with women in my experience. However, it's possible that I just prefer women in authority due to conditioning. I can't even really say that I've been lead by other men very much. Regardless of authority, I think I just tend to question or ignore it. I'm not really proud of this and it can become dysfunctional, but I am what I am.

 

[Straw Dog]

Meh. I usually ignore what Southern Baptists say. They're too wacky for me. Way too conservative.

Yeah, we've probably already gone beyond the intellectual threshold of what most Southern Baptists are willing to discuss.

 

[Me Myself]

In my experience, women tend to make better managers and men seem to make better leaders. This is by no means clearly cut, but it does seems to be the case more often than not within my discrimination.

Am I still just being sexist? Or is this more a product of expected gender roles? Are there more actual differences between genders than just biology? I don't precisely know.

Maybe there is a tendency for that.

 

[Sees]

I would like to hear philosophical reasons why people believe a certain sex should be subservient to the other. We all know back in the old days "might makes right", but in modern times (and ancient for some cultures) there has to be better reasoning. Convenience and tradition shouldn't provide all answers.