• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Women are proof of the existence of God

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
The Baha'is do not try to define what cannot be defined as you do, defining God as pantheistic, with polytheist anthropomorphized God(s) added on.
You too define your God in many ways and in quite detail. What he does and what he wants. How do you know about someone who cannot be described? And that he sends messengers and manifestations to the world. :)

So, don't point fingers at us polytheists. And I am really surprised that with your background of Maths, Physics and Cosmology, how can you still have such weird beliefs!
 
Last edited:

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
You too define your God in many ways and in quite detail.

Actually no, describing the relationship with the Creator, does not describe the limits and ultimate nature of the 'Source.' Pantheism specifically limithe ts God as the physical existence it self. In the Baha'i Faith the physical existence reflects some of the attributes of God not God. There is no 'quite detail' of God nor God's nature as far as the apophatic view of God from the Baha'i perspective.

What he does and what he wants. How do you know about someone who cannot be described? And that he sends messengers and manifestations to the world. :) [/quiote]

Describing some of the attributes of God is not describing nor limiting the nature of God as the pantheistic God is described.



So, don't point fingers at us polytheists.

So, . . . don;t take it personal if we disagree on theological nor philosophical questions.I disagree with anthropomorphic Monotheism and Polytheism, especially when they worship gold cultural depictions.

And I am really surprised that with your background of Maths, Physics and Cosmology, how can you still have such weird beliefs!

All this says to me is we will likely agree on Maths, Physics and Cosmology.
 

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
In the Baha'i Faith the physical existence reflects some of the attributes of God not God. There is no 'quite detail' of God nor God's nature as far as the apophatic view of God from the Baha'i perspective.
Which means he is no longer unidentifiable, unexplanable. I think Bahaullah knew more about this God than that.
 

2ndpillar

Well-Known Member
There is no objective verifiable evidence for a 'designer.' It is possible that the 'designer' is simply the eternal Laws of Nature.

The "eternal Laws of Nature" point to their being a creator of those Laws, which are the law of Karma, for every force their is an equal and opposite force. To have light, requires one must first have darkness. Without evil, how can there be goodness, unless you have a new creation, based on different laws. There's the rub.
 

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
The "eternal Laws of Nature" point to their being a creator of those Laws, which are the law of Karma, for every force their is an equal and opposite force. To have light, requires one must first have darkness. Without evil, how can there be goodness, unless you have a new creation, based on different laws. There's the rub.

Yes, I believe they point a Creator, but not your, nor my interpretation of the Creator.
Every force has an opposite force simply applies a Newtonian concept physics about our physical nature of our universe, and does not apply to the spiritual nature of our existence, nor does the Quantum World of Quantum Mechanics follow this principle.
 
Last edited:

Thief

Rogue Theologian
That picture reminds me of:

Proverbs 5:3-4 “For the lips of an immoral woman are as sweet as honey, and her mouth is smoother than oil. But in the end she is as bitter as poison, as dangerous as a double-edged sword.”
hmmmm

sounds like....unrequited love

but the handiwork of God?
 

2ndpillar

Well-Known Member
Yes, I believe they point a Creator, but not your, nor my interpretation of the Creator.
Every force has an opposite force simply applies a Newtonian concept physics about our physical nature of our universe, and does not apply to the spiritual nature of our existence, nor does the Quantum World of Quantum Mechanics follow this principle.


As Einstein, one of the founders of Quantum theory, said, "God does not play with dice". The Spiritual side of for every force, there is an equal and opposite force, is that for every evil/lawless, there is an opposite and equal good/lawful, which requires evil to exist in this paradigm. How can Conservatives be good, without the bad liberals. As Newton found, the answer is in the Word of God. Your basic particle arrangement, will be pictured in the make up of Israel, taking Abraham, as the initial unit, adding Isaac, as a dependent unit, and Jacob, a third dependent unit, from which you get 12 basic combinations, broken down into 10, and 2 plus 1, which are parallel to another inverse set of the same imagery, representing Esau. From these basic elements, you can combine them into the basic complex compound units, which can be visualized in macro form in the building blocks of DNA, which use the same building blocks that are used for Nature and the Universe. The base units are depicted as the unit 1, square root of 2, and tau. Without the "Word of God", there is no TOE theory. Leonardo used these same basic building units in his work. A man before his time.
 
Last edited:

dfnj

Well-Known Member
As Einstein, one of the founders of Quantum theory, said, "God does not play with dice". The Spiritual side of for every force, there is an equal and opposite force, is that for every evil, there is an opposite and equal good, which requires evil to exist in this paradigm. How can Conservatives be good, without the bad liberals. As Newton found, the answer is in the Word of God. Your basic particle arrangement, will be pictured in the make up of Israel, taking Abraham, as the initial unit, adding Isaac, as a dependent unit, and Jacob, a third dependent unit, from which you get 12 basic combinations, broken down into 10, and 2 plus 1, which are parallel to another inverse set of the same imagery, representing Esau. From these basic elements, you can combine them into the basic complex compound units, which can be visualized in macro form in the building blocks of DNA, which use the same building blocks that are used for Nature and the Universe. The base units are depicted as the unit 1, square root of 2, and tau. Without the "Word of God", there is no TOE theory. Leonardo used these same basic building units in his work. A man before his time.

Why is the idea of a clockwork Universe like cement in everyone's minds. God is dice in action. Reality always turns out to be so much stranger than anything we could have ever imagined.
 

2ndpillar

Well-Known Member
Why is the idea of a clockwork Universe like cement in everyone's minds. God is dice in action. Reality always turns out to be so much stranger than anything we could have ever imagined.


The "lawless", the wicked/evil, represented by Esau, are a "dice in action", the lawful, the righteous, represented by the ultimate Jeshurun/Israel, will be ordered. The mix throws a monkey wrench in trying to represent that order/disorder arrangement, such as tried with Quantum Theory. Plato and Archimedes imagined the structure of the Universe, which on a macro level is played out in the structure of the building blocks of DNA, which gives an insight into the structure of Nature and the Universe, which is displayed in the imagery of Galaxies, and that of flowers. Man has a problem imagining it, but the creator, wrote a how too book. If you go to Australia, the Universe is anticlockwise, and the water goes down the drain in an anticlockwise direction. Their clockwork is apparently opposite of that in America, where the Australian liberals are called conservatives in America.
 
Top