X-MEN movies are Gay AGENDA?

[Kilgore Trout]

I'm more disturbed by the moron agenda.

 

[Wirey]

I'm more disturbed by the moron agenda.

It keeps showing up.

 

[Kilgore Trout]

It keeps showing up.

Their agenda is actually dangerous, because repeatedly reading threads pushing their moronic agenda definitely makes me feel stupider.

 

[Father Heathen]

He was clear with, "Till now i havent seen any homosexual flirtings or homo couple."

...and that has to do with "infiltration" what? Yes, I'm well aware of his homophobic sentiments, but how does depictions or portrayals of something constitute an "infiltration"? Infiltration implies clandestine, hostile and subversive intent.

 

[Father Heathen]

I think some might be missing the point.These X-Men movies are not supposed to show homosexual flirting or anything like that.It is done in a subtle way.In disguise so to speak.The director Brian Singer explains it in detail.There is a coming out scene.Mutant is code for gay.He makes this very clear.Also the don't ask don't tell reference in the movie.So it is not supposed to show gay scenes,as in kissing men, or things of that nature.It is a political stance on the matter.This movie is supposed to show the struggles a gay person has to overcome in order to gain acceptance.The video explains it all.

And?

 

[Father Heathen]

Their agenda is actually dangerous, because repeatedly reading threads pushing their moronic agenda definitely makes me feel stupider.

Fortunately, the moronic agenda tends to simply preach to the choir, as you have to already be a moron to swallow their swill.

 

[suncowiam]

I don't think it is...

This thread sounds homophobic in essence.

Why do I suggest that?

So what if a movie has a gay agenda?

Does that mean this thread has an anti-gay agenda for scrutinizing a movie with a supposedly gay agenda?

 

[MysticSang'ha]

I think some might be missing the point.These X-Men movies are not supposed to show homosexual flirting or anything like that.It is done in a subtle way.In disguise so to speak.The director Brian Singer explains it in detail.There is a coming out scene.Mutant is code for gay.He makes this very clear.Also the don't ask don't tell reference in the movie.So it is not supposed to show gay scenes,as in kissing men, or things of that nature.It is a political stance on the matter.This movie is supposed to show the struggles a gay person has to overcome in order to gain acceptance.The video explains it all.

Yes. Allegory is extremely powerful when employed in narratives. Jesus spoke in parables to send messages in morality and understanding the Kosmos, social structures, and the human condition. But Biblical narratives aren't the only examples in literature or art where parables, allegory, and metaphor exist. You see it all around us in various forms of literary, graphic, plastic, and film art.

What I see the OP and the youtube video attempting to display is the harm the narrative of how homosexuals tell their story. It's the same old tactic of dehumanization of those who are already marginalized through by demonization and through misinformation and "poisoning the well" fallacies. What the video seems to want is for homosexuals and everyone else who is LGBT to shut up, know their place as evil pedophiles who prey on children, and to accept Jesus as their Lord and Savior.

That's one of the reasons why I left the church decades ago and believe it's one of the best decisions I made for my own peace of mind and my happiness. There's no conspiracy-theory in the video. Just plain old hateful homophobia. No thanks on my end.

 

[Revoltingest]

It keeps showing up.

We do what we can to infiltrate.

 

[Revoltingest]

I think some might be missing the point.These X-Men movies are not supposed to show homosexual flirting or anything like that.It is done in a subtle way.In disguise so to speak.The director Brian Singer explains it in detail.There is a coming out scene.Mutant is code for gay.He makes this very clear.Also the don't ask don't tell reference in the movie.So it is not supposed to show gay scenes,as in kissing men, or things of that nature.It is a political stance on the matter.This movie is supposed to show the struggles a gay person has to overcome in order to gain acceptance.The video explains it all.

That seems a pretty good summary, except that "disguise" is the wrong word.
The gay reference seems pretty clear...& well done.
Even I, a kunckle walking reprobate, didn't get creeped out by it.

 

[Nada]

That seems a pretty good summary, except that "disguise" is the wrong word.
The gay reference seems pretty clear...& well done.
Even I, a kunckle walking reprobate, didn't get creeped out by it.

Thank you. I appreciate the cool response.You always have the best comments.

 

[Wirey]

I think the X-Men is a pro-JW movie. Think about it. Brian Singer knocks on doors at inappropriate times constantly. They all look and dress weird, they hide form normal people, they destroy every life they touch, and in the end they still pretend to hold the moral high ground. Insidious devils, those JWs.

Gee, that was easy, too. No proof required.

 

[Nada]

Yes. Allegory is extremely powerful when employed in narratives. Jesus spoke in parables to send messages in morality and understanding the Kosmos, social structures, and the human condition. But Biblical narratives aren't the only examples in literature or art where parables, allegory, and metaphor exist. You see it all around us in various forms of literary, graphic, plastic, and film art.

What I see the OP and the youtube video attempting to display is the harm the narrative of how homosexuals tell their story. It's the same old tactic of dehumanization of those who are already marginalized through by demonization and through misinformation and "poisoning the well" fallacies. What the video seems to want is for homosexuals and everyone else who is LGBT to shut up, know their place as evil pedophiles who prey on children, and to accept Jesus as their Lord and Savior.

That's one of the reasons why I left the church decades ago and believe it's one of the best decisions I made for my own peace of mind and my happiness. There's no conspiracy-theory in the video. Just plain old hateful homophobia. No thanks on my end.

Thank you for your honest comment.I do appreciate your view.Peace.

 

[Servant_of_the_One1]

Um.. okay.

He said he wouldn't watch X-Men if gays "infiltrate" it, so I asked him what me meant by "infiltrate".

Gayism within Movies is when u see two gays/lesbians in bedscene or flirting.


In my opinion a heterosexual couple in bedscene is already too much pornographic material. What could be much worse is to see two lesbians/gays holding hands, let alone the bed action.


They should warn people though when there is some homosexual parts.

 

[melk]

I think some might be missing the point.These X-Men movies are not supposed to show homosexual flirting or anything like that.It is done in a subtle way.In disguise so to speak.The director Brian Singer explains it in detail.There is a coming out scene.Mutant is code for gay.He makes this very clear.Also the don't ask don't tell reference in the movie.So it is not supposed to show gay scenes,as in kissing men, or things of that nature.It is a political stance on the matter.This movie is supposed to show the struggles a gay person has to overcome in order to gain acceptance.The video explains it all.

. Since i've always felt kind of a weird, i plainly loved the earliest movies of the serie. That's not the case of the latest ones. The defense of the gay cause, that was previously subtile and not direct, has become a banner with obvious links. The mutants, earlier identified with the maladjusted in general, have lost their universality in favor of a specific type. Pitty for the serie.

 

[Revoltingest]

Thank you. I appreciate the cool response.You always have the best comments.

Frubal fish'n, eh?
Well, it worked!

 

[The Neo Nerd]

By bible students logic "Lord of the Rings" was about "the gay agenda".

Think about it.

- 4 dudes set out on a journey, no chicks there.
- The "one ring" (need i say more)
- They meet up with 3 older, more experienced dudes
- They get help from the elves (all exceptionally pretty and dressed in robes)
- Ian Mckellen is in it
- All the battles are metaphors for battling their own sexual desires

Proof incontrovertible

Suck it

 

[Revoltingest]

By bible students logic "Lord of the Rings" was about "the gay agenda".

Think about it.

- 3 dudes set out on a journey, no chicks there.
- The "one ring" (need i say more)
- They meet up with 3 older, more experienced dudes
- They get help from the elves (all exceptionally pretty and dressed in robes)
- Ian Mckellen is in it
- All the battles are metaphors for battling their own sexual desires

Proof incontrovertible

Suck it

The only flaw is that Sam came home to his fecund lassie.

 

[beenherebeforeagain]

The only flaw is that Sam came home to his fecund lassie.

Clearly, Samwise Gamgee was Bi.

Thus, he tried gay first, but in the end CHOSE to be hetero.

 

[Revoltingest]

Clearly, Samwise Gamgee was Bi.

Or just experimenting.