Please quote from Yajurveda, if one considers it a Veda, to prove one's point of view. Kindly
Regards
Is that like "the Bible is correct because it says it is"?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Please quote from Yajurveda, if one considers it a Veda, to prove one's point of view. Kindly
Regards
Please quote from the Yajurveda where it says one must quote from the Yajurveda in order to prove that it is in the Yajurveda. Otherwise there is no proof.
Please quote from Yajurveda, if one considers it a Veda, to prove one's point of view. Kindly
Regards
I was doing some further reading on this just this morning, and there was a spot ( I couldn't find it just now) where later archeologists proved that was once originally thought to be a horse wasn't actually a horse at all, but some other animal.
Here is more recent stuff. http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-new-research-debunks-aryan-invasion-theory-1623744
http://archaeologyonline.net/artifacts/aryan-invasion-history
http://www.stephen-knapp.com/aryan_invasion_theory_the_final_nail_in_its_coffin.htm
https://arisebharat.com/2008/01/21/bbc-accepts-that-the-aryan-invasion-theory-is-flawed/
In short, there are dozens of papers disproving the AIT, and it's later sister, AMT. One can keep with the modern times and research, or choose to live in antiquity. One of the critiques used by the anti-Hindu crowd is only that Hindus are disputing it. This is also not true. It's western anthropologists, gene researchers, and archeologists who are refuting it.
Lots, if not all history is flawed.It is a controversial subject. Vedic history itself is flawed. Please
Regards
Yajurveda: “This battle is the source of thy prosperity; hence we goad thee to that battle”
Chapter XV (15) Verse 36
36. O ruler equipped with a good army, worthy of praise with words, provider of dwelling to his subjects, affluent, brilliant, and resembling fire, grant us laudable riches.
https://archive.org/stream/yajurveda029670mbp/yajurveda029670mbp_djvu.txt
Regards
The point is:
"36. O ruler equipped with a good army, worthy of praise with words, provider of dwelling to his subjects, affluent, brilliant, and resembling fire, grant us laudable riches."
https://archive.org/stream/yajurveda029670mbp/yajurveda029670mbp_djvu.txt
Veda exhorts in prayer of a "good army" that is source of "riches". Right? Please
Regards
This picture makes more sense than this entire thread
Wow!
Regards
This picture makes more sense than this entire thread
I must contemplate this!
The point is:
"36. O ruler equipped with a good army, worthy of praise with words, provider of dwelling to his subjects, affluent, brilliant, and resembling fire, grant us laudable riches."
https://archive.org/stream/yajurveda029670mbp/yajurveda029670mbp_djvu.txt
Veda exhorts in prayer of a "good army" that is source of "riches". Right? Please
I tried to look into Yajurveda as to what enemies/foes did the Aryans have to face against whom they had to had raise an army headed by not a less than a general to fight against for their properity, but could no locate in it.
Will anybody help us in this regards?
Jihad are two type:You were already told that's a metaphor for one's internal struggles and wars. Y'know... like the true meaning of jihad?
We did.