Yes or no?

[Kilgore Trout]

Yes or no? Or maybe?

Why or why not?

Please be specific, thorough, and make sure you use plenty of credible academic references which support both your central thesis, as well as any corollary arguments. After all, this is an internet forum.

 

[Daemon Sophic]

I would suggest "Yes", or to be more precise....."Why Not?"

 

[Iti oj]

Yes because i said so and you did not. I am going to be specific which should not be confused with pacific which is an ocean i am moving too. In adjacent to that point I would say that maybe don't exist either you believe yes or you believe no.
References:
My ***

 

[Daemon Sophic]

Formerly I may have cosidered the option of stating the negative, or "No" option. But I simply cannot bring myself to promote another 4 years of power for the Republican party.
To give you some idea of the proclivity of this invective I suggest these articles for you perusal. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/party-of-no/

 

[sun rise]

Yes and no are a false dichotomy or not a false dichotomy.

 

[Skwim]

No yes is no
some maybes are no
____________________
Some maybes are not yes

(Festino)​

.​

 

[4consideration]

Yes or no? Or maybe?

No. Absolutely not.

Why or why not?

If I have to explain it to you, that is proof you couldn't possibly understand it.

Please be specific, thorough, and make sure you use plenty of credible academic references which support both your central thesis, as well as any corollary arguments. After all, this is an internet forum.

I went to school, and since I can be certain of that but have to exercise faith in order to believe that you went to school too, the only intelligent and logical conclusion for me to arrive at is that I am better educated, more intelligent, and better looking than you, so it would be beneath me to converse with you further.

 

[Revoltingest]

Yes.
Because.
Evidence....

 

[Buttercup]

No,

because,

evidence.

 

[Revoltingest]

No,

because,

evidence.

Such a cromulent argument is hard to refute.

 

[BSM1]

Sometimes both, sometimes neither.

 

[Augustus]

No, no, no. Because repeating the same point again and again and again with the same reasoning never fails to persuade internet adversaries to agree that they were wrong and bow to your superior intellect.. So no.

They even penned songs to commemorate how correct I am.

 

[Skwim]

Maybe.

Because.

Evidence...

 

[rosends]

I think that the answer is clear. Over time, with the options weighed, history has presented us with a solution and a resolution -- one which avoids the pitfalls while accentuating the advantages. Statistics, research, interviews and peer reviewed articles have pointed definitively in this one direction and have put the question to bed quite handily, and I heartily endorse their approach and conclusions.

 

[Deidre]

Always maybe.

 

[Erebus]

Maybe.

I can back this up with the most irrefutable evidence of all ... scripture!

"But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay:
for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil." - Mathew 5:37

 

[Paleo]

Yes and no are too mainstream; maybe is the way of the future.

 

[Kilgore Trout]

I think that the answer is clear. Over time, with the options weighed, history has presented us with a solution and a resolution -- one which avoids the pitfalls while accentuating the advantages. Statistics, research, interviews and peer reviewed articles have pointed definitively in this one direction and have put the question to bed quite handily, and I heartily endorse their approach and conclusions.

This is the most detailed and definitive analysis yet, which highlights the importance of thorough research, as well as the correct application of statistical and scientific methods, in ultimately finding the answers to such crucial questions, such as that posed in the OP. I think, after reading such an excellent, and academically rigorous, post on the topic at hand, there can be no doubt as to the final answer, as proven by the hard work of countless members of the intelligentsia.

 

[Kilgore Trout]

Yes and no are too mainstream; maybe is the way of the future.

More like, "I dunno," Shrug.

 

[rosends]

This is the most detailed and definitive analysis yet, which highlights the importance of thorough research, as well as the correct application of statistical and scientific methods, in ultimately finding the answers to such crucial questions, such as that posed in the OP. I think, after reading such an excellent, and academically rigorous, post on the topic at hand, there can be no doubt as to the final answer, as proven by the hard work of countless members of the intelligentsia.