Orbit
I'm a planet
Science says so: The More Money You Earn The Happier You Are, Large Study Finds
75K is the sweet spot for life satisfaction
75K is the sweet spot for life satisfaction
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
75K is the sweet spot for life satisfaction
That information seems reasonable to me. That number may change over the years, but I believe the concept is pretty solid.Science says so: The More Money You Earn The Happier You Are, Large Study Finds
75K is the sweet spot for life satisfaction
The article's title is deceiving. It implies that there is a direct correlation. Not true.Science says so: The More Money You Earn The Happier You Are, Large Study Finds
75K is the sweet spot for life satisfaction
I wonder if that amount must be maintained or if its only required that someone make that level of success for a brief period?. What if five years of success are all it takes for someone to be happy ever after, and then they can live at a lower income level and still be happy?
Yeah, who would've thought that having money to pay rent, bills, and have some left over would make someone happy? So surprising. I wonder how much money they wasted on this study of the obvious. Unfortunately, it's only getting harder and harder to have that sort of income, if you were lucky enough to ever earn that much in the first place.Science says so: The More Money You Earn The Happier You Are, Large Study Finds
75K is the sweet spot for life satisfaction
Science says so: The More Money You Earn The Happier You Are, Large Study Finds
75K is the sweet spot for life satisfaction
That ain't enough for Hong KongScience says so: The More Money You Earn The Happier You Are, Large Study Finds
75K is the sweet spot for life satisfaction
I thought I saw a post or OP about people earning $450K being happiest. Maybe $450K and up.
Not enough? Really? What would be enough?That ain't enough for Hong Kong
The study dealt with US participants only. I guess it would be lower in countries with a working social net. Not living in fear of total bankruptcy or devastating illness will increase the life satisfaction index.That ain't enough for Hong Kong
It's obvious that whoever said money can't buy happiness had plenty enough to afford saying so.
Or San Francisco.That ain't enough for Hong Kong
There is that mentality you can't buy happiness. Bull**** I say. I moved out of Indiana, got out of poverty, amd it's great to be able to just pay the bills even if it's not pay day, and even better not having to wait for your next paycheck just to have more money to have no money again.Yeah, who would've thought that having money to pay rent, bills, and have some left over would make someone happy? So surprising. I wonder how much money they wasted on this study of the obvious. Unfortunately, it's only getting harder and harder to have that sort of income, if you were lucky enough to ever earn that much in the first place.
Maybe that's my key to making that sort of money - just make up an excuse to do a study on something really common sense and rake in the money telling people what they already know.
It wasn't cited, and highly doubtful given few people make that much and we see a thresh hold that is much lower, and beyond that it doesn't make much a difference.I thought I saw a post or OP about people earning $450K being happiest. Maybe $450K and up.
After having your basic needs met (food, water, shelter), you aim for security, security in stored goods if something goes wrong. In a natural environment your ability to store is limited by space and the shelf life of the stored goods.It wasn't cited, and highly doubtful given few people make that much and we see a thresh hold that is much lower, and beyond that it doesn't make much a difference.
Despite the claims of Capitalism most people just aren't driven or motivated by money. We're motivated to have enough, basically more or less like humans have always been. We love and appreciate recieving an especially bountiful harvest, but we're just as happy and content with an average harvest harvest that will provide enough to meet our needs until the next harvest. We don't, as a species, need more than what we need. And too much I would wager most people really wouldn't want because, throughout our evolution, having too much is having more that can be used, and if we can't get rid of it it goes to waist. Getting rid of it, especially in large quantities, is still a fairly new thing for us.
There is that mentality you can't buy happiness. Bull**** I say. I moved out of Indiana, got out of poverty, amd it's great to be able to just pay the bills even if it's not pay day, and even better not having to wait for your next paycheck just to have more money to have no money again.
People who believe that have either struggled or have never even tasted how much better life with even just enough money to have comfortably enough.
But, in regards to happiness, science has not found it to make much a difference beyond about $75,000/year.After having your basic needs met (food, water, shelter), you aim for security, security in stored goods if something goes wrong. In a natural environment your ability to store is limited by space and the shelf life of the stored goods.
Once you have money, you can store infinite amounts. There is no natural limit. Some people can reason that a certain amount is enough but there seems to be no natural satiation for safety in humans. So the urge to store money never ends. And when you can get more money with ever less effort, money becomes a fetish. (See Karl Marx, Das Kapital: The fetish character of money.)